College Football Thread
- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
I know these rankings don't mean anything right now but Clemson over Miami is LOL funny. Yes, I'm aware that Clemson has more solid wins but it's still absurd.
They lost to a team Miami beat. And the QB injury is no excuse when Wake Forest put up 64 on Syracuse too.
The other thing is Georgia was ranked #1, largely because of their big win over ND...by 1 point. Miami beats them by 30 and is still behind a 1 loss team.
Lame
They lost to a team Miami beat. And the QB injury is no excuse when Wake Forest put up 64 on Syracuse too.
The other thing is Georgia was ranked #1, largely because of their big win over ND...by 1 point. Miami beats them by 30 and is still behind a 1 loss team.
Lame
- Cnasty
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 65672
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Feels good to hear non-Miami fans express the absurdity of it.
But yea, we control our own rankings basically so we will let it slide for now!
But yea, we control our own rankings basically so we will let it slide for now!
- GeorgesGoons
- Reactions:
- Posts: 23176
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
- Location: Omaha
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
They'll get to settle it on the field in the championship game.
What if
Miami and Alabama win out
Wisconsin loses to Michigan and the title game
Oklahoma loses again
Two 2 loss teams in the playoffs over a 12-0 UCF team if they can win out. Most likely, way too much blue blood to allow an outsider in. Not saying they would have a chance at winning but they should be given a chance right?
What if
Miami and Alabama win out
Wisconsin loses to Michigan and the title game
Oklahoma loses again
Two 2 loss teams in the playoffs over a 12-0 UCF team if they can win out. Most likely, way too much blue blood to allow an outsider in. Not saying they would have a chance at winning but they should be given a chance right?



- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
My UCF peeps have 0 shot at getting in.
I don't know who gets in with your scenario, but there would be a host of 2 loss squads that UCF had no shot of jumping. UGA, Clemson, Wisconsin, UGA, ND, PSU/OSU, USC, TCU.
I don't know who gets in with your scenario, but there would be a host of 2 loss squads that UCF had no shot of jumping. UGA, Clemson, Wisconsin, UGA, ND, PSU/OSU, USC, TCU.
- GeorgesGoons
- Reactions:
- Posts: 23176
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
- Location: Omaha
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
I agree there is no way they would jump them with the way it is decided now. But they should give them a chance. Boise State wasn't given the opportunity for a long time as well, but when they played the big boys in the bowls they did very well.shel311 wrote:My UCF peeps have 0 shot at getting in.
I don't know who gets in with your scenario, but there would be a host of 2 loss squads that UCF had no shot of jumping. UGA, Clemson, Wisconsin, UGA, ND, PSU/OSU, USC, TCU.



-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 17241
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
- Location: Small Town, Ohio
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
I love Ohio State, but if they win out and are the Big10 champs, most are saying they get into the playoff hunt.
I just do not agree with a 2 loss team being in the playoff hunt under the current setup.
Now, if you take what Reign originally proposed and have the 4 big conference winners then 2 non conference teams in there, that is a different story.
I just do not agree with a 2 loss team being in the playoff hunt under the current setup.
Now, if you take what Reign originally proposed and have the 4 big conference winners then 2 non conference teams in there, that is a different story.
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
- GeorgesGoons
- Reactions:
- Posts: 23176
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
- Location: Omaha
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Big 10The_Niddler wrote:I love Ohio State, but if they win out and are the Big10 champs, most are saying they get into the playoff hunt.
I just do not agree with a 2 loss team being in the playoff hunt under the current setup.
Now, if you take what Reign originally proposed and have the 4 big conference winners then 2 non conference teams in there, that is a different story.
Big XII
SEC
Pac 10
What about ACC?
I think it would be great if the big 5 were in and 3 at large bids. If another conference not in Big 5 has an undefeated champion they are automatically in as an at large.



- Wasted Memory
- Reactions:
- Posts: 11804
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:22 am
- Location: Cookeville, TN
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
GeorgesGoons wrote:Big 10The_Niddler wrote:I love Ohio State, but if they win out and are the Big10 champs, most are saying they get into the playoff hunt.
I just do not agree with a 2 loss team being in the playoff hunt under the current setup.
Now, if you take what Reign originally proposed and have the 4 big conference winners then 2 non conference teams in there, that is a different story.
Big XII
SEC
Pac 10
What about ACC?
I think it would be great if the big 5 were in and 3 at large bids. If another conference not in Big 5 has an undefeated champion they are automatically in as an at large.
Are you just naming the conferences or stating that the PAC 12 would get in over the ACC?
- GeorgesGoons
- Reactions:
- Posts: 23176
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
- Location: Omaha
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Those are your typical big 5 conferencesWasted Memory wrote:GeorgesGoons wrote:Big 10The_Niddler wrote:I love Ohio State, but if they win out and are the Big10 champs, most are saying they get into the playoff hunt.
I just do not agree with a 2 loss team being in the playoff hunt under the current setup.
Now, if you take what Reign originally proposed and have the 4 big conference winners then 2 non conference teams in there, that is a different story.
Big XII
SEC
Pac 10
What about ACC?
I think it would be great if the big 5 were in and 3 at large bids. If another conference not in Big 5 has an undefeated champion they are automatically in as an at large.
Are you just naming the conferences or stating that the PAC 12 would get in over the ACC?



-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:14 pm
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
4 best teams right now are Wisky, Bama, Miami, and Auburn from what I have seen with my own eyes at THIS POINT of the season. Two of these teams play each other which is rad, the Iron Bowl has so much implication this year, its crazy.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:14 pm
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Double post, was talking to some friends today....
Is there no more under rated program in the last 20 years in Football than Wisconsin? They are always a great program and fun to watch play, and I have been to Camp Randall, I would put it up against any stadium in the country in getting hyped up for a big game.
Is there no more under rated program in the last 20 years in Football than Wisconsin? They are always a great program and fun to watch play, and I have been to Camp Randall, I would put it up against any stadium in the country in getting hyped up for a big game.
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Tim Duncan of CFBpacksyd2284 wrote:Double post, was talking to some friends today....
Is there no more under rated program in the last 20 years in Football than Wisconsin? They are always a great program and fun to watch play, and I have been to Camp Randall, I would put it up against any stadium in the country in getting hyped up for a big game.

Re: 2017 College Football Thread
There is absolutely nothing fun about watching Wisconsin play. The stadium atmosphere is great but their style could not be more boring
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:14 pm
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
It works year in and year out and they have to play that style at times because of the weather and they do not get the same kind of talent as most SEC schools.wdoupis wrote:There is absolutely nothing fun about watching Wisconsin play. The stadium atmosphere is great but their style could not be more boring
- GeorgesGoons
- Reactions:
- Posts: 23176
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
- Location: Omaha
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Wisconsin is fun to watch because the defense knows what they are going to do 90% of the time and still can't stop it. It's not even chess for them as like most offenses. They line their 300+lb linemen up and run it down your throat. The second half is where you see the effects of that style of offense.packsyd2284 wrote:It works year in and year out and they have to play that style at times because of the weather and they do not get the same kind of talent as most SEC schools.wdoupis wrote:There is absolutely nothing fun about watching Wisconsin play. The stadium atmosphere is great but their style could not be more boring



- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Not a fan of watching Wisconsin games. Snore-fests. If ND isn't playing, my #2 team to watch is Georgia Tech. Beyond that, I'm looking for an explosive offense... preferably with spread option elements.
PSN: ReignOnU
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Side note, if someone successfully brings back the Power I or Veer Option, sign me up!
PSN: ReignOnU
- Cnasty
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 65672
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Oh yeaaaaa, Reign is an Irish fan.
Hi Reign!!!!
Hi Reign!!!!

- GeorgesGoons
- Reactions:
- Posts: 23176
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
- Location: Omaha
- Contact:
Re: 2017 College Football Thread
Would love to see the power I option againReignOnU wrote:Side note, if someone successfully brings back the Power I or Veer Option, sign me up!


