stat of the day

All NDL or video game football related conversations go here.
User avatar
Nole4real
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 13402
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:18 am
Location: NDL:F Tampa division

stat of the day

Post by Nole4real »

only 4 qb's threw more than 30 tds

5 threw more than 40 ints

17 threw more than 30 ints

do we suck that badly or does ea need to adjust?
Image
User avatar
shel311
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 72606
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: Sheltown Shockers

Re: stat of the day

Post by shel311 »

Heisman level!!!! :lol:
User avatar
ChampDizzle
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 4875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:40 pm
Location: Augusta, Georgia

Re: stat of the day

Post by ChampDizzle »

Nole4real wrote:only 4 qb's threw more than 30 tds

5 threw more than 40 ints

17 threw more than 30 ints

do we suck that badly or does ea need to adjust?
I would say the former :D
Image
ajalves
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 32648
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:45 pm
Location: Port Orange

Re: stat of the day

Post by ajalves »

Nole4real wrote:do we suck that badly or does ea need to adjust?
its tough to throw deep anymore. there is never a busted coverage deep.

DBs still can lock you down at times
Image
User avatar
autiger730
Reactions:
Posts: 3615
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: stat of the day

Post by autiger730 »

Nole4real wrote:only 4 qb's threw more than 30 tds

17 threw more than 30 ints
Only one threw over 40 TDs AND 30 ints. ;)
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
User avatar
fsupenguin
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:59 am
Location: Madisonville TN

Re: stat of the day

Post by fsupenguin »

I tossed 14 of the 26 picks I threw in my 3 losses, so ya I think its about adjustments as my numbers were respectable if you takes those 3 games away.
User avatar
6ftdeep
Reactions:
Posts: 2051
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:58 pm
Location: Bay Area, California

Re: stat of the day

Post by 6ftdeep »

I m willing to bet a majority of most of the ints this year came against Man defense, and largely against cover 2 man.

As the man cover 2 defense has a tendency to mirror routes, so even when you think you have a step on a defender you don't, as the dbs or lb are inside and they make a play on the ball for int. And when the defense goes into mirror mode there is only about 3 routes sometimes 4 that get consistent separation for safe passes, otherwise it is usually a pick.

So I would say we have to adjust, but EA definitely needs to adjust their programing of man coverage.
Image
User avatar
autiger730
Reactions:
Posts: 3615
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: stat of the day

Post by autiger730 »

6ftdeep wrote:I m willing to bet a majority of most of the ints this year came against Man defense, and largely against cover 2 man.

As the man cover 2 defense has a tendency to mirror routes, so even when you think you have a step on a defender you don't, as the dbs or lb are inside and they make a play on the ball for int. And when the defense goes into mirror mode there is only about 3 routes sometimes 4 that get consistent separation for safe passes, otherwise it is usually a pick.

So I would say we have to adjust, but EA definitely needs to adjust their programing of man coverage.
This is the truth.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
User avatar
GeorgesGoons
Reactions:
Posts: 23176
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
Location: Omaha
Contact:

Re: stat of the day

Post by GeorgesGoons »

6ftdeep wrote:I m willing to bet a majority of most of the ints this year came against Man defense, and largely against cover 2 man.

As the man cover 2 defense has a tendency to mirror routes, so even when you think you have a step on a defender you don't, as the dbs or lb are inside and they make a play on the ball for int. And when the defense goes into mirror mode there is only about 3 routes sometimes 4 that get consistent separation for safe passes, otherwise it is usually a pick.

So I would say we have to adjust, but EA definitely needs to adjust their programing of man coverage.
What are those 3 or 4 routes? I threw 8 picks one game (my worst ever) and I tried what I thought everything...Slants, In's, Out's, Corner and Fly routes, all of them resulted in at least one pick.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
jsence2
Reactions:
Posts: 18758
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: stat of the day

Post by jsence2 »

6ftdeep wrote:I m willing to bet a majority of most of the ints this year came against Man defense, and largely against cover 2 man.

As the man cover 2 defense has a tendency to mirror routes, so even when you think you have a step on a defender you don't, as the dbs or lb are inside and they make a play on the ball for int. And when the defense goes into mirror mode there is only about 3 routes sometimes 4 that get consistent separation for safe passes, otherwise it is usually a pick.

So I would say we have to adjust, but EA definitely needs to adjust their programing of man coverage.

Which is why I docked the one coach who ran the scheme the entire game we played. It's ridiculous how "improved" the defensive AI is supposed to be in regards to them not breaking on passes they can't see. I guess they can see everything now, is what they meant.
Image

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
User avatar
iRoccafella
Reactions:
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: C-Springs, CO
Contact:

Re: stat of the day

Post by iRoccafella »

GeorgesGoons wrote:
6ftdeep wrote:I m willing to bet a majority of most of the ints this year came against Man defense, and largely against cover 2 man.

As the man cover 2 defense has a tendency to mirror routes, so even when you think you have a step on a defender you don't, as the dbs or lb are inside and they make a play on the ball for int. And when the defense goes into mirror mode there is only about 3 routes sometimes 4 that get consistent separation for safe passes, otherwise it is usually a pick.

So I would say we have to adjust, but EA definitely needs to adjust their programing of man coverage.
What are those 3 or 4 routes? I threw 8 picks one game (my worst ever) and I tried what I thought everything...Slants, In's, Out's, Corner and Fly routes, all of them resulted in at least one pick.
I assume Hooks/Curls have to be one...
AIM: JestaZ69 e-Mail: iRoccafella@gmail.com PSN - iRoccafella
ImageImage[/url]
User avatar
autiger730
Reactions:
Posts: 3615
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: stat of the day

Post by autiger730 »

GeorgesGoons wrote:
6ftdeep wrote:I m willing to bet a majority of most of the ints this year came against Man defense, and largely against cover 2 man.

As the man cover 2 defense has a tendency to mirror routes, so even when you think you have a step on a defender you don't, as the dbs or lb are inside and they make a play on the ball for int. And when the defense goes into mirror mode there is only about 3 routes sometimes 4 that get consistent separation for safe passes, otherwise it is usually a pick.

So I would say we have to adjust, but EA definitely needs to adjust their programing of man coverage.
What are those 3 or 4 routes? I threw 8 picks one game (my worst ever) and I tried what I thought everything...Slants, In's, Out's, Corner and Fly routes, all of them resulted in at least one pick.
Timing is key. User catching and ball placement as well.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
User avatar
autiger730
Reactions:
Posts: 3615
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: stat of the day

Post by autiger730 »

I would say nearly all my INTs came against man. Probably 80% or more. That said, I felt like I was looking at man at least 65-75% of the time in games.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
User avatar
Wasted Memory
Reactions:
Posts: 11804
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:22 am
Location: Cookeville, TN

Re: stat of the day

Post by Wasted Memory »

autiger730 wrote:I would say nearly all my INTs came against man. Probably 80% or more. That said, I felt like I was looking at man at least 65-75% of the time in games.

To me that's not really surprising. What, we were half way through the season before the defensive AI update came out? Even after that I think zone was easily exploited. Seems like I constantly gave up first downs whenever I ran zone. Guys were open all over the place, middle of the field, outs, etc. I did mix in zone when on defense because I knew I'd get dinged in my CR's if I didn't, but I cringed every time I picked a zone play.
User avatar
yougoogelizer
Reactions:
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:45 pm
Location: Peoria, AZ

Re: stat of the day

Post by yougoogelizer »

Wasted Memory wrote:
autiger730 wrote:I would say nearly all my INTs came against man. Probably 80% or more. That said, I felt like I was looking at man at least 65-75% of the time in games.

To me that's not really surprising. What, we were half way through the season before the defensive AI update came out? Even after that I think zone was easily exploited. Seems like I constantly gave up first downs whenever I ran zone. Guys were open all over the place, middle of the field, outs, etc. I did mix in zone when on defense because I knew I'd get dinged in my CR's if I didn't, but I cringed every time I picked a zone play.

Same here. I would say 80% of the zone plays I picked ended up in big pass plays...mostly to a TE lol. Zone in this years game is not good against the run or pass. At least not with my team. IDK what its like with a team like Miami where most the defensive backfield has higher zone D ratings the man D ratings...
PSN: yougoogelizer
AIM: chriscmacx

Season 22: Oregon Ducks 6-7
Season 23: FIU Panthers 3-9

Image
Image
User avatar
autiger730
Reactions:
Posts: 3615
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: stat of the day

Post by autiger730 »

I wouldn't say zone was easily exploited. I threw plenty of incomplete/batted passes against it. But it definitely wasn't as good as man and it has improved. It is about 10000x better than it was in 11.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
User avatar
LetsGoPeay
Reactions:
Posts: 15191
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: stat of the day

Post by LetsGoPeay »

My DBs were so bad that I couldn't rely on one type of defense over another. My only hope was that the other guy would be confused by what he saw and either throw a bad pass or hold on to the ball for the minimum of 8 seconds that it would take my D-line or a blitzer to get to the QB.
Image
User avatar
6ftdeep
Reactions:
Posts: 2051
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:58 pm
Location: Bay Area, California

Re: stat of the day

Post by 6ftdeep »

zone is not that bad.. maybe because Im Oregon but I played about 75% to 80% zone D, and I would manage to get stops.. I managed to give up big plays as well, but I actually feel Zone played the run way better then man.
Image
User avatar
OracleHCR
Reactions:
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:43 pm

Re: stat of the day

Post by OracleHCR »

Do any of you guys that have a problem with the zone coverage mix in some aggressive or conservative settings? Mix it up.
User avatar
Wasted Memory
Reactions:
Posts: 11804
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:22 am
Location: Cookeville, TN

Re: stat of the day

Post by Wasted Memory »

OracleHCR wrote:Do any of you guys that have a problem with the zone coverage mix in some aggressive or conservative settings? Mix it up.
No, I never have.
Post Reply

Return to “NDL Open Forum”