College Football Thread
- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: College Football Thread
LSU gets the lamest possible bowl matchup, UCF with no McKenzie Milton.
Gross
Gross
- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15327
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: College Football Thread
Backup seemed solid yesterday.shel311 wrote:LSU gets the lamest possible bowl matchup, UCF with no McKenzie Milton.
Gross




Re: College Football Thread
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Backup seemed solid yesterday.shel311 wrote:LSU gets the lamest possible bowl matchup, UCF with no McKenzie Milton.
Gross
Your playing for a National champ. Don’t let me down.


- GeorgesGoons
- Reactions:
- Posts: 23176
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
- Location: Omaha
- Contact:
Re: College Football Thread
I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.



- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: College Football Thread
Ohio St was in 2 seasons ago, I think.
- Wasted Memory
- Reactions:
- Posts: 11804
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:22 am
- Location: Cookeville, TN
Re: College Football Thread
GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
So what you're saying is without expansion there's no way the B1G can get in?

Re: College Football Thread
Washington played Bama year before last.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.


Re: College Football Thread
If CFP went to 8 people still bitch and want 12. It ain’t perfect but at least it’s not decided by a CPU. College football is such a different animal it’s never gonna be perfect.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.


- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15327
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: College Football Thread
shel311 wrote:Ohio St was in 2 seasons ago, I think.
Correct. However didn't "represent" very well. Got rolled by Clemson





Re: College Football Thread
yeah but you'd know whatd be better than 40 useless bowls? playoffs.BFiVL wrote:If CFP went to 8 people still bitch and want 12. It ain’t perfect but at least it’s not decided by a CPU. College football is such a different animal it’s never gonna be perfect.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
If there was 8 teams, every conference could get a team, plus best group of 5 team and 2 wildcards...
Alabama vs Washington
Clemson vs UCF
Notre Dame vs Ohio St
Oklahoma vs Georgia
I would watch the hell of those.
Re: College Football Thread
Uuaww wrote:yeah but you'd know whatd be better than 40 useless bowls? playoffs.BFiVL wrote:If CFP went to 8 people still bitch and want 12. It ain’t perfect but at least it’s not decided by a CPU. College football is such a different animal it’s never gonna be perfect.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
If there was 8 teams, every conference could get a team, plus best group of 5 team and 2 wildcards...
Alabama vs Washington
Clemson vs UCF
Notre Dame vs Ohio St
Oklahoma vs Georgia
I would watch the hell of those.
Still would have 40 useless bowls. Bowls are not going away even with 8 teams.


- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: College Football Thread
That's what we have now.Uuaww wrote:yeah but you'd know whatd be better than 40 useless bowls? playoffs.
Going to 8 as you suggested will just shift the argument to which 2 wildcards get in. It doesn't actually stop any of the issues we have now.
But yes, I'd watch the hell out of that as well.
Re: College Football Thread
You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.


Re: College Football Thread
im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
Re: College Football Thread
Uuaww wrote:im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
To me you if expand the playoff you are going to see elimination of conf champ games and any OOC games of substance during regular season. No Thanks.


- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: College Football Thread
If you go to 8 teams, I still think you take the top 8 teams, no auto bids for winning a conference as that ignores 2/3rds of the season's out of conference games.
Also, I doubt they would, but if you got 8 and you keep the 1st round games at the top 4 seeds' stadiums, that would put an emphasis on playing for seeding and likely reduce some of that likely elimination of tough OOC matchups.
Also, I doubt they would, but if you got 8 and you keep the 1st round games at the top 4 seeds' stadiums, that would put an emphasis on playing for seeding and likely reduce some of that likely elimination of tough OOC matchups.
Re: College Football Thread
Start gambling. I want MORE BOWL GAMES. All teams 4-8 and above should go bowling!!!!!!!!!!Uuaww wrote:BFiVL wrote:bowl games are just useless to me.
Re: College Football Thread
what they need to do is standardize scheduling. 9 game conference schedules. 1 FCS max, 1 Group of 5, 1 Power 5 minimum.shel311 wrote:If you go to 8 teams, I still think you take the top 8 teams, no auto bids for winning a conference as that ignores 2/3rds of the season's out of conference games.
Also, I doubt they would, but if you got 8 and you keep the 1st round games at the top 4 seeds' stadiums, that would put an emphasis on playing for seeding and likely reduce some of that likely elimination of tough OOC matchups.
Re: College Football Thread
So the alternative is half the teams play for practically no reason other than conference bragging rights?BFiVL wrote:Uuaww wrote:im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
To me you if expand the playoff you are going to see elimination of conf champ games and any OOC games of substance during regular season. No Thanks.
8 has its issues like everything but at least at that point you “shouldn’t “ ever have an issue where an undefeated team is left out. The whole “4 best” or “8 best” subjective stuff is such a slap in the face to playing games. Why bother having a 4 team playoff? We all know Bama is the #1 team let’s just crown them.

Re: College Football Thread
DRiccio21 wrote:So the alternative is half the teams play for practically no reason other than conference bragging rights?BFiVL wrote:Uuaww wrote:im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
To me you if expand the playoff you are going to see elimination of conf champ games and any OOC games of substance during regular season. No Thanks.
8 has its issues like everything but at least at that point you “shouldn’t “ ever have an issue where an undefeated team is left out. The whole “4 best” or “8 best” subjective stuff is such a slap in the face to playing games. Why bother having a 4 team playoff? We all know Bama is the #1 team let’s just crown them.
Looks like we value different factors in allowing teams in a playoff. When someone smarter than me finds a way to create all conf and schedules equal then I’ll value record over all else.

