What are you calling major? I think everyone loses at least one guy during the season for a couple months.
I'm Team duster here, if I read that correctly. I would probably be okay with upping the major injuries but only if these minor injuries absurd lengths were put in check.
2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1
Moderators: Cnasty, Ry, nick, ReignOnU, Bernie32
- Wasted Memory
- Reactions:
- Posts: 11804
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:22 am
- Location: Cookeville, TN
- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15327
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1
Are injuries down? Do we have proof of this? I know someone did the research a while back, but not sure how recently.The_Niddler wrote:I think the injuries are down because there are only a handful of teams that have a trainer rated lower than excellent:
(Everyone else's is Excellent or higher)
Albany - Good
Indianapolis - Good
Las Vegas - Good
Montreal - Good
Sheltown - Good
Steel City - Decent




- LetsGoPeay
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15191
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:29 am
- Location: Hoosierland
Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1
They should be down. It's 2048. I'm sure most injuries have been genetically engineered out of humans by this point.

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1
ties into your players (iron man, wrecked, etc) and your trainer.Uuaww wrote:teams can go entire seasons without a major injury... it is pretty common. That doesn't appear to be normal. I hear things that mlb teams start AAA middle relievers in a pinch due to their staffs being injured. That never happens with us.ajalves wrote:this topic caught me off guard. Explain why you'd want to raise their frequency
But not what people want, it is fine, seems most would rather have even less or no injuries.
Similar to teams who get money ties into your owner.. . . . ... ..


- Boston_Rob
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:18 pm
- Location: Panama City Bucs
Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1
This is dumb. Thought you were better than this Ted. Let's not tinker if we don't have too.
Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1
the term is TWEAK!Boston_Rob wrote: Let's nottinker if we don't have too.

- Boston_Rob
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:18 pm
- Location: Panama City Bucs
Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1
I thought tinker was the plural present or TweakDRiccio21 wrote:the term is TWEAK!Boston_Rob wrote: Let's nottinker if we don't have too.