Boxing
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
MANNY LOST?!?!??!?!
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
He had it stolen from him. That fight wasn't even close. How could Bradley get the win?
- Cnasty
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 65672
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
Absolutely terrible.
Wow
Vegas bitches. Talk about a fix.
Wow
Vegas bitches. Talk about a fix.

- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
My goodness... how much money did that just cost Manny if he looks for Mayweather now? Wow.
What were they watching? Did they ding him for lack of activity early in the rounds? Body punches from Bradley? IDK, stunned.
What were they watching? Did they ding him for lack of activity early in the rounds? Body punches from Bradley? IDK, stunned.
PSN: ReignOnU
- UnTouchable8
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:37 pm
- Location: Austin, Tx
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
Fuck this bullshit. I'm done with boxing.
New Rule: Stop calling disasters with a single survivor a "miracle." When 103 people die, but one lives, that's not a miracle. That's God blowing a no-hitter in the bottom of the ninth. - Bill Maher
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
I can argue 10, 11, 12 for Bradley... maybe 2 rounds around 6-8.. so at most 5, right?
PSN: ReignOnU
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
What little credibility boxing had, it just lost.
That is the most corrupt thing I've ever witnessed in sports. Just no words.
That is the most corrupt thing I've ever witnessed in sports. Just no words.

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
You know, I will say that Kellerman is making a solid point here at the end about the influence of the commentary. I can't say I had the clearest stream so I know I took their word for it on a few shots, in terms of impact. I still can't imagine that I'd be that far off.
PSN: ReignOnU
- Cnasty
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 65672
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
Manny was pretty lazy throughout but Bradley wasnt landing shots and when Manny did get his activity level higher, he was landing big shots.
Bradley was the aggressor and I thought he won 2 or 3 rounds but didnt see that decision at all.
We will never see Mayweather/Pacquiao now.
My wife's family doesnt watch one sport but they can breakdown boxing like animals since they love Manny. Cant wait to here that next Filipino gathering talk.
Bradley was the aggressor and I thought he won 2 or 3 rounds but didnt see that decision at all.
We will never see Mayweather/Pacquiao now.

My wife's family doesnt watch one sport but they can breakdown boxing like animals since they love Manny. Cant wait to here that next Filipino gathering talk.
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
The talk and the lumpia and maybe some pancit.Cnasty wrote:Manny was pretty lazy throughout but Bradley wasnt landing shots and when Manny did get his activity level higher, he was landing big shots.
Bradley was the aggressor and I thought he won 2 or 3 rounds but didnt see that decision at all.
We will never see Mayweather/Pacquiao now.![]()
My wife's family doesnt watch one sport but they can breakdown boxing like animals since they love Manny. Cant wait to here that next Filipino gathering talk.
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
I will say this....I always throw some money on the underdog in boxing cards, because of how corrupt crap is. I made a little cash tonight 


S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
- BigStimpin
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:28 am
- Location: Henderson, Nevada
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
Somewhere Dana White is laughing his ass off.
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
Bradley's own manager said that he had scored the fight 8-4 for Pacman. Nuff said.

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
trendon wrote:If it is a fix, what is the motive?
A "fix" doesn't mean either fighter had anything to do with it; all it takes is a judge who is willing to be paid off....I can think of one guy in particular who would benefit GREATLY from what happened tonight, but nobody can talk to him right now, there's no visitation after "lights out".

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
- LetsGoPeay
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15191
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:29 am
- Location: Hoosierland
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
The conspiracy theorist in me wants to say Pacquiao brought this upon himself. They couldn't create the mega-bout, and knew it was a lost cause and was never going to happen, so they are creating a new opponent for Mayweather who will be dubbed "better"
- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: Boxing: Pacquiao v Bradley (OMFG)
Who is that opponent?Uuaww wrote:so they are creating a new opponent for Mayweather who will be dubbed "better"