FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Block M · Post by **Block M** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:19 pm

So I believe four teams are making the jump in the next two years.

We should see Texas State and UTSA ( both WAC) on NCAA 13
UMASS (MAC) and South Alabama (Sun Belt) on NCAA 14

This correct?

Post by **NCSUholmey** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:27 pm

yes, I am already starting to download the images for those teams.

Thats where those small icons that I was looking a while back comes into play.

tball275 · Post by **tball275** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:31 pm

Let me know if you need logos for UTSA or TXST.

Post by **NCSUholmey** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:47 pm

2012 Additions
UTSA Roadrunners (WAC)

Texas State Bobcats (WAC)

beercop · Post by **beercop** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:14 pm

I'm ready to start that dynasty at USA.

kdog36 · Post by **kdog36** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:14 pm

Tx State is in NCAA 13 I just found my next Western Kentucky

My new Dynasty team will be the Bobcats. (formerly know as soutwest Texas State Bobcats)

I just pre-ordered the pre-order of NCAA 13

LetsGoPeay · Post by **LetsGoPeay** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:17 pm

NCSUholmey wrote: Texas State Bobcats (WAC)

Bullshit. This is Texas State.

kdog36 · Post by **kdog36** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:18 pm

LetsGoPeay wrote:
NCSUholmey wrote: Texas State Bobcats (WAC)

Bullshit. This is Texas State.

I agree 100%. They are Southwest Texas State to me and always will be.

If i get them I plan on asking your help with a SIG idea.

RanDawg · Post by **RanDawg** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:44 pm

I am actually considering dropping my dynasty in Houston just so I can create one in San Marcos. Being I actually graduated from Southwest Texas State University back in December 02 after 5 1/2 wonderful years. . . . guess I have some time to decided, don't I.

Knapp · Post by **Knapp** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:26 pm

We could disband the Farm and just make the WAC and/or Sun Belt be our "Farm".

VeniVediV1ci · Post by **VeniVediV1ci** » Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:43 pm

RanDawg wrote:I am actually considering dropping my dynasty in Houston just so I can create one in San Marcos. Being I actually graduated from Southwest Texas State University back in December 02 after 5 1/2 wonderful years. . . . guess I have some time to decided, don't I.

i respect that, no better time than when Case graduates (only took 16 years)

bearass · Post by **bearass** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:57 am

Lol harsh

skinautique79 · Post by **skinautique79** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:45 am

one of my favorite movies.....

nick · Post by **nick** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:52 am

Image was a favorite of mine too

trendon · Post by **trendon** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:58 pm

Block M wrote:So I believe four teams are making the jump in the next two years.

We should see Texas State and UTSA ( both WAC) on NCAA 13
UMASS (MAC) and South Alabama (Sun Belt) on NCAA 14

This correct?

I am pretty sure they will all be in the new version of the game since they are all going to be provisional FBS schools next year and full-timers in 2013.

razorback44 · Post by **razorback44** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:59 pm

trendon wrote:
Block M wrote:So I believe four teams are making the jump in the next two years.

We should see Texas State and UTSA ( both WAC) on NCAA 13
UMASS (MAC) and South Alabama (Sun Belt) on NCAA 14

This correct?
I am pretty sure they will all be in the new version of the game since they are all going to be provisional FBS schools next year and full-timers in 2013.

Yep that should be correct. USA is playing a full Sun Belt schedule but just can't win the conference.

USA will play all Division I teams in 2012, including eight games against Sun Belt Conference schools. Those games will count in Sun Belt standings, but the Jaguars will not be eligible for the SBC title. South Alabama will become a full member of the conference in 2013.

VeniVediV1ci · Post by **VeniVediV1ci** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:26 pm

how can you play all the games but not be eligible to win the conference? I know it's cuz they're not a member, but just doesn't seem like it makes sense

nick · Post by **nick** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:53 pm

VeniVediV1ci wrote:how can you play all the games but not be eligible to win the conference? I know it's cuz they're not a member, but just doesn't seem like it makes sense

same sport u can go undefeated and not win it all

Post by **shel311** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:04 pm

nick wrote:
VeniVediV1ci wrote:how can you play all the games but not be eligible to win the conference? I know it's cuz they're not a member, but just doesn't seem like it makes sense
same sport u can go undefeated and not win it all

But Houston woulda probably beat LSU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nick · Post by **nick** » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:07 pm

shel311 wrote:
nick wrote:
VeniVediV1ci wrote:how can you play all the games but not be eligible to win the conference? I know it's cuz they're not a member, but just doesn't seem like it makes sense
same sport u can go undefeated and not win it all
But Houston woulda probably beat LSU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sit on a tack

NDL Forum

FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13

Re: FBS Expansion and NCAA 13