Page 1 of 2

Realignment Vote

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 1:59 am
by DRWebs
In order to discuss possible options

Re: Relocation Vote

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 3:18 am
by cougnix
I don't think you mean relocation. Pretty sure you mean realignment, yes?

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 9:35 pm
by Cnasty
Bumping this to make sure everyone votes since all the discussion was in the other thread.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:31 am
by ReignOnU
16 v 6... seems clear.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:44 am
by Seeitsaveit13
Ugh.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:52 am
by cougnix
This vote is for "Realignment Discussion" not actual realignment. We have to vote on that...

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:01 pm
by ReignOnU
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Ugh.

Better hope you pick after me.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:03 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
Don't really care. Just not looking forward to pandora's box.

Plus you've only got ~3 years left. So it doesn't really matter ;-)

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:21 pm
by ajalves
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Don't really care. Just not looking forward to pandora's box.

Plus you've only got ~3 years left. So it doesn't really matter ;-)
what exactly is your problem with it

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:26 pm
by steelcitychaos
Is this coming up again because certain divisions have stronger divisional games?

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:29 pm
by ajalves
steelcitychaos wrote:Is this coming up again because certain divisions have stronger divisional games?

I see it more as in trying something out after close to 40 "years" of the same ole

just my thoughts.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:30 pm
by ajalves
and for the record.....the AL East is strong sure....I think I would attribute that more towards having 5 super active owners where some other divisions have guys who are not quite as active

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:31 pm
by cougnix
ajalves wrote:
steelcitychaos wrote:Is this coming up again because certain divisions have stronger divisional games?

I see it more as in trying something out after close to 40 "years" of the same ole

just my thoughts.
I see it as Wasted wants a shot at a division title...

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:33 pm
by Wasted Memory
cougnix wrote:
ajalves wrote:
steelcitychaos wrote:Is this coming up again because certain divisions have stronger divisional games?

I see it more as in trying something out after close to 40 "years" of the same ole

just my thoughts.
I see it as Wasted wants a shot at a division title...
:lol:
Please, for the love of all that's holy, let me pick after Reign!

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:33 pm
by nick
ReignOnU wrote:
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Ugh.

Better hope you pick after me.
you better hope you pick after me.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:36 pm
by cougnix
Wasted Memory wrote:
cougnix wrote:
ajalves wrote:
steelcitychaos wrote:Is this coming up again because certain divisions have stronger divisional games?

I see it more as in trying something out after close to 40 "years" of the same ole

just my thoughts.
I see it as Wasted wants a shot at a division title...
:lol:
Please, for the love of all that's holy, let me pick after Reign!
Wasted's dream ping pong picks:

1. Nick
2. Reign
3. Ted
4. AJ
5. Shel
6. Wasted

lol...(top 5 order in no particular order. Others left out intentionally)

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:41 pm
by nick
we should do the draft backwards tho, the top 18 and then 12.

because hypothetically, if say iunno, me and reign do end up in a division.. of the 18 in the "bottom" the final 3 will probably pick our division, so it'll be Mia/Cin/3 bottom teams and we got this problem again.

Least if the bottom 18 fill out and then the final 12, it will be more "even"

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:57 pm
by cougnix
nick wrote:we should do the draft backwards tho, the top 18 and then 12.

because hypothetically, if say iunno, me and reign do end up in a division.. of the 18 in the "bottom" the final 3 will probably pick our division, so it'll be Mia/Cin/3 bottom teams and we got this problem again.

Least if the bottom 18 fill out and then the final 12, it will be more "even"
I would say that you have limits on those as well. from first 12, two in each division, next 12 next two spots, then last 6 fill in.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 2:06 pm
by GeorgesGoons
Who cares, draw a name and then draw a division and be done with it.

Re: Realignment Vote

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 2:20 pm
by Cnasty
ajalves wrote:
steelcitychaos wrote:Is this coming up again because certain divisions have stronger divisional games?

I see it more as in trying something out after close to 40 "years" of the same ole

just my thoughts.
I can't speak for the rest of the guys but from my perspective this is the exact reason for me voting for it to be done.