New Buckeye Dynasty...

Moderators: jsence2, Wasted Memory

Post Reply
User avatar
mbyrd75
Reactions:
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

New Buckeye Dynasty...

Post by mbyrd75 »

1. Downing- Kansas
2. Mbyrd- Minnesota
3. Niddler- Akron
4. txfan-
5. wasted- Western Kentucky
6. Knapp- Idaho
7. Buckeye- Marshall
8. Liquid- Washington St
9. Whittness10- Bowling Green
10. Phreakksshow- Air Force

with so many unplayed games out there maybe there's 11 others itching to play more? anybody interested in a new online dynasty maybe coordinators only? The coordinator thing isn't a big deal but if i can get at least a few other people ill fire one up
Last edited by mbyrd75 on Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:39 pm, edited 14 times in total.
User avatar
Downing11
Reactions:
Posts: 2063
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:48 am
Location: Tewksbury, MA

Re: new dynasty

Post by Downing11 »

If it is a fairly slow moving one, I'm in. This would be my 4th, plus Madden coming up. I see Madden moving slowly since there will be a lot of user vs. user games.

Any thoughts to teams? I enjoy using the lesser teams.
User avatar
mbyrd75
Reactions:
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: new dynasty

Post by mbyrd75 »

yeah i was hoping to go 3* and lower advance every 2-3 days maybe more depending on games that need to be played. nothing crazy
User avatar
Downing11
Reactions:
Posts: 2063
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:48 am
Location: Tewksbury, MA

Re: new dynasty

Post by Downing11 »

Count me in then. Team TBD.
User avatar
I_S33M_THAB33T_U
Reactions:
Posts: 4848
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: new dynasty

Post by I_S33M_THAB33T_U »

Sorry but 4 is my limit, it's bad enough people are slowly joining to many and forgetting to play in some.
The_Niddler
Reactions:
Posts: 17231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
Location: Small Town, Ohio

Re: new dynasty

Post by The_Niddler »

I am interested.
As Downing mentioned, if it is slower moving, count me in.

I am just in Wasted's and the regular NDL games. So I have time for 1 more dynasty.
And if user games are minimal, that helps it too so I dont have to wait around for anyone.

Let me know what you do decide for teams.

When you say 3 *'s what teams would that be?
Sorry, I only know them by letter grade.

Like C and under or what you thinking?
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
User avatar
mbyrd75
Reactions:
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: new dynasty

Post by mbyrd75 »

yeah itll move pretty slow i'd only advance sooner than 48 hours if everyone were ready. 48 isn't set in stone either. There isn't really a letter grade when it comes to star ratings. in the Online dynasties i think baylor and miss st are both 3* as well as kansas etc. It would basically be the bottom of the BCS conferences and most of the non BCS
The_Niddler
Reactions:
Posts: 17231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
Location: Small Town, Ohio

Re: new dynasty

Post by The_Niddler »

Where can I go to look at the * ratings?
Would it tell me this in the current OD I am in?

Does the star ratings change from OD to OD?

You can count me in though.
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
User avatar
I_S33M_THAB33T_U
Reactions:
Posts: 4848
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: new dynasty

Post by I_S33M_THAB33T_U »

Make a new offline od and once you are at selection of your team, h will see the star each team is
The_Niddler
Reactions:
Posts: 17231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
Location: Small Town, Ohio

Re: new dynasty

Post by The_Niddler »

Thanks
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
User avatar
texasfan4444
Reactions:
Posts: 9858
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Re: new dynasty

Post by texasfan4444 »

I'd like to join. Actually looking for one that allows the recruit advisor. Got a code for it from one of my buddies that works for GameStop but I haven't found one that allows me to use it.
User avatar
mbyrd75
Reactions:
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: new dynasty

Post by mbyrd75 »

texasfan4444 wrote:I'd like to join. Actually looking for one that allows the recruit advisor. Got a code for it from one of my buddies that works for GameStop but I haven't found one that allows me to use it.
doesn't matte to me honestly. idk how much of an advantage it gives since ive always been too cheap to pay for it. im fine with it as long as nobody else objects.
User avatar
Wasted Memory
Reactions:
Posts: 11765
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:22 am
Location: Cookeville, TN

Re: new dynasty

Post by Wasted Memory »

I'll jump in.
User avatar
mbyrd75
Reactions:
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: new dynasty

Post by mbyrd75 »

sweet. 5 of us should be enough to at least get going and since we're moving slowly others can join if they want. Make sure we all create a coach and ill send invites out tonight
User avatar
texasfan4444
Reactions:
Posts: 9858
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Re: new dynasty

Post by texasfan4444 »

Awesome. As far as I know it's more about recommending pitches and when to pitch them. After reading about it it only gives you one recommendation a week if I'm not mistaken. So there isn't much of an advantage that I know of.
User avatar
mbyrd75
Reactions:
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: new dynasty

Post by mbyrd75 »

ah well thats no big deal then im good with it.
User avatar
Wasted Memory
Reactions:
Posts: 11765
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:22 am
Location: Cookeville, TN

Re: new dynasty

Post by Wasted Memory »

Just out of curiosity here, looking over the 3* teams and there's some pretty impressive teams:

Baylor - 87
Boston - 85
Cal - 85
Cincy - 89
FIU - 85
Fresno - 87
Houston - 87
K State - 91
Louisville - 87
Maryland - 85
Miss St - 87
NC State - 91
Northwestern - 87
Pitt - 85
Purdue - 87
Rutgers - 87
SMU - 89
Texas Tech - 87
Tulsa - 91
UCF - 85
UCLA - 87
Virginia - 89

What exactly are we going for here? 3* and doesn't matter rating? Or are we looking for a more challenging OD?
User avatar
Downing11
Reactions:
Posts: 2063
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:48 am
Location: Tewksbury, MA

Re: new dynasty

Post by Downing11 »

Wasted Memory wrote:Just out of curiosity here, looking over the 3* teams and there's some pretty impressive teams:

Baylor - 87
Boston - 85
Cal - 85
Cincy - 89
FIU - 85
Fresno - 87
Houston - 87
K State - 91
Louisville - 87
Maryland - 85
Miss St - 87
NC State - 91
Northwestern - 87
Pitt - 85
Purdue - 87
Rutgers - 87
SMU - 89
Texas Tech - 87
Tulsa - 91
UCF - 85
UCLA - 87
Virginia - 89

What exactly are we going for here? 3* and doesn't matter rating? Or are we looking for a more challenging OD?
I'd prefer lower rated teams, not sure what 2* will get us. Maybe instead of limiting the *s, we limit the overall rating of teams?
User avatar
mbyrd75
Reactions:
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:44 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: new dynasty

Post by mbyrd75 »

Downing11 wrote:
Wasted Memory wrote:Just out of curiosity here, looking over the 3* teams and there's some pretty impressive teams:

Baylor - 87
Boston - 85
Cal - 85
Cincy - 89
FIU - 85
Fresno - 87
Houston - 87
K State - 91
Louisville - 87
Maryland - 85
Miss St - 87
NC State - 91
Northwestern - 87
Pitt - 85
Purdue - 87
Rutgers - 87
SMU - 89
Texas Tech - 87
Tulsa - 91
UCF - 85
UCLA - 87
Virginia - 89

What exactly are we going for here? 3* and doesn't matter rating? Or are we looking for a more challenging OD?
I'd prefer lower rated teams, not sure what 2* will get us. Maybe instead of limiting the *s, we limit the overall rating of teams?
maybe thats a better option. C+ teams only good for everyone?
The_Niddler
Reactions:
Posts: 17231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
Location: Small Town, Ohio

Re: new dynasty

Post by The_Niddler »

C+ or worse works for me.


I am looking for a challenge, so I will take Akron.
I was debating taking them in Wasted's OD. That is where I went to school, so I will take them and have some fun with it.

Are we limiting it like Wasted did to only 2 human controlled teams per conference and try to keep 1 team per division within the conference?


Here are the C+ or worse teams to choose from:


EMU C+ C+ C
Hawaii C+ C+ B-
Kansas C+ B- C+
Miami, OH C+ B- C
Minnesota C+ C C+
Navy C+ C+ C+
NIU C+ C+ C+
Oregon State C+ B- C+
WMU C+ C+ C
Vanderbilt C+ B- C
ULL C+ B- C-

Air Force C C C
Rice C C C
Marshall C C C-
Ball State C C+ C-
WKU C C C
Bowling Green C C C+
CMU C C+ C-
SJSU C C C
UTEP C C C+
Troy C C C

Buffalo C- C C-
Kent State C- C- C
North Texas C- C- C-
ULM C- C D

Akron D D+ D
FAU D D D
Memphis D D+ D
Idaho D D D+
MTSU D C- D
New Mexico D D C-
NMSU D C- D
Texas State D D+ D
UAB D C- D
UMASS D D D
UNLV D D+ D
UTSA D D+ D
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
Post Reply

Return to “Online Dynasty”