Page 1 of 1

Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:47 am
by Nole4real
sorry if this is old, i didnt see on boards and just saw for 1st time

damn COD! :lol:

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... aaf-wp9871

Charlie Strong has seen the enemy of Louisville’s focus, and its name is ‘Call of Duty’
By Matt Hinton

Typically, when coaches talk about the distractions consuming their players, they mean the Big Stuff: School, family, money, relationships. Times are hard. Earning a degree is hard. Kids come from some pretty hard places.

That's true at Louisville as well as anywhere else, and Charlie Strong is as accustomed as any coach to dealing with the diversions that follow his players into the locker room. As Strong admitted Monday, though, less than 48 hours after the Cardinals came out looking flat and unprepared in a 21-14 loss to Pittsburgh, his powers of motivation weren't able to overcome the release of an addictive new video game:

"Young people are dealing with so much," Strong said when talking about his team's lack of focus and preparation for the Pittsburgh game. "I told them Tuesday. I get them off the practice field and we weren't sharp, so you're thinking you come back on Wednesday and we weren't sharp then. There's a new video game that came out and those guys are so... I said, how can you allow a video game to take control of what you have in your hand and what's ahead of you[?]"

[…]

Strong said he told the team Wednesday, "This video game is that important? We'll see how important it is on Saturday. I said, in about a week or so, you're going to be throwing that video game away. But we let a video game take control of us. […]"

The video game in question is "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3," a hugely popular title released last week in which players are tasked with executing complex missions around the globe, preferably involving maximum carnage from their vantage point as a first-person shooter. Many thousands of potentially productive man-hours — quite possibly even a few by football players at Pitt — have been sunk into playing alongside other gamers in the game's highly popular online mode.

"Our guys talk about it. What's the buzz? You hear it all the time, what is it, 'Call to Duty,' the new video game out?" Strong said, slightly mangling the title. "So it was a call to duty [against Pitt] and they got called to duty Saturday."

Indeed: With Cincinnati's loss to West Virginia, Louisville had an opening to move into a tie with the Bearcats atop the Big East standings. Instead, it squandered the momentum of last week's upset over West Virginia with a home flop that left Cincy in sole possession of first place and the Cardinals caught up with four other teams — Pittsburgh, Rutgers, UConn and West Virginia — in a hopeless tangle with two conference losses apiece.

Whether he knows it or not, Strong may be on the cutting edge of neuroscience: Despite a strong push by engineers and other gamer-friendly types to spread the word that video games may actually improve cognitive abilities, a more recent study released in September says that's a lot of hogwash. So your parents were probably right about putting down the controller and going outside, after all. Now, reading football blogs, on the other hand...

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:52 am
by packsyD22
Our kids were fucking worthless at practice the day after this came out. Our o line coach called it too.

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:56 am
by DRiccio21
excuses, excuses.

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:21 am
by dakshdar
DRiccio21 wrote:excuses, excuses.
It is too bad that UConn got an advance copy for every player before the season started.

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:21 am
by DRiccio21
dakshdar wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:excuses, excuses.
It is too bad that UConn got an advance copy for every player before the season started.
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

:lol:


UConn wins out and Pitt/WVU winner loses their other game and that means UConn to the BCS, get ready!

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:41 am
by Cnasty
DRiccio21 wrote:UConn wins out and Pitt/WVU winner loses their other game and that means UConn to the BCS, get ready!
Lets keep posting it, someone will eventually reply.

Guilty :oops:

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:23 pm
by DRiccio21
Cnasty wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:UConn wins out and Pitt/WVU winner loses their other game and that means UConn to the BCS, get ready!
Lets keep posting it, someone will eventually reply.

Guilty :oops:
i win!

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:52 pm
by VeniVediV1ci
soon the Big East will lose their BCS tie-in and we won't have to pay attention to this crap like the Sun Belt

(go WKU)

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:51 pm
by TEEwade
I hate how people in the media are spinning this into a "we lost because..." comment. I mean in all reality there is probably some truth to kids being unfocused because of the game. However, UofL has been unfocused after big wins all season and just isn't that good a team which is why they lost. Too much youth and they have been go through growing pains all year. I think Strong knew these comments would get attention and I really hope the players are embarrassed. No way he was really trying to insinuate COD was the sole reason Louisville lost the game. The real sad part here is that at 5-5 with losses to Marshall, and FIU at home UofL has a good a chance as anyone to win this pathetic conference and represent it in the BCS.

Re: Louisville loses (irl) because of COD

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 5:01 pm
by sixpackdan101
dakshdar wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:excuses, excuses.
It is too bad that UConn got an advance copy for every player before the season started.
That was great