Page 5 of 14

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:45 am
by nick
GeorgesGoons wrote:Even if Ry takes AL red there will be 2 more open spots right? I can pick AL red with him if I wanted? Or am I completely not understanding this draft?
yes. go to sleep

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:47 am
by GeorgesGoons
nick wrote:
GeorgesGoons wrote:Even if Ry takes AL red there will be 2 more open spots right? I can pick AL red with him if I wanted? Or am I completely not understanding this draft?
yes. go to sleep
You watch your tone! It's only 6:45pm. Probably should go to sleep, nothing else to do here.

Wake up
Fly
Eat (if there is food)
masturbate, because I am bored
go to sleep

Pretty much my day in a nutshell

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:48 am
by DRWebs
Jerry's browsing the forums praying Ry makes his selection before he has to ;)

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:48 am
by dakshdar
When did New England and Alabama flip which group they were in (Top 12 vs Bottom 18)?

Re: Realignment Live Draft

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:49 am
by Cnasty
DRWebs wrote:As requested Corey

Image

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:55 am
by The_Niddler
DRWebs wrote:Jerry's browsing the forums praying Ry makes his selection before he has to ;)
Some of us work during the day, sorry! ;)

The Predators will take the NL Red.

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:56 am
by Cnasty
Niddler takes nl red
Baker takes nl white

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:56 am
by Cnasty
Sheltown on the clock

Re: Realignment Draft(Sheltown on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:58 am
by ajalves
before he posts, I can tell you shel will go AL Blue

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:00 pm
by dakshdar
I saw that, but 0.002 percentage points on a 20+ season win percentage is trumping the fact that a Top 12 team in a now closed division finished a net 95.5 games out of first the last two seasons?

Shit, Port Orange finished a net 65 games ahead of NE the last two seasons -- and they're now supposed to represent the top of that division together?

This is not a dig at Dave, he's rebuilding and that's part of the process. I hope he'll prove me wrong here and rebound to form quickly, but I didn't think that was his plan from what he's been doing this year and last (full scrub of the entire organization to rebuild, not a quick turnaround re-tool).

Re: Realignment Draft(Sheltown on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:02 pm
by nick
Image

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:03 pm
by ajalves
dakshdar wrote:I saw that, but 0.002 percentage points on a 20+ season win percentage is trumping the fact that a Top 12 team in a now closed division finished a net 95.5 games out of first the last two seasons?

Shit, Port Orange finished a net 65 games ahead of NE the last two seasons -- and they're now supposed to represent the top of that division together?

This is not a dig at Dave, he's rebuilding and that's part of the process. I hope he'll prove me wrong here and rebound to form quickly, but I didn't think that was his plan from what he's been doing this year and last (full scrub of the entire organization to rebuild, not a quick turnaround re-tool).
I hear you but lets not act like the bottom 18 are all scrubs. some solid teams there

Re: Realignment Draft(Sheltown on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:05 pm
by GeorgesGoons
C'mon Ry, lets go to the AL Red together.

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:05 pm
by dakshdar
ajalves wrote:
dakshdar wrote:I saw that, but 0.002 percentage points on a 20+ season win percentage is trumping the fact that a Top 12 team in a now closed division finished a net 95.5 games out of first the last two seasons?

Shit, Port Orange finished a net 65 games ahead of NE the last two seasons -- and they're now supposed to represent the top of that division together?

This is not a dig at Dave, he's rebuilding and that's part of the process. I hope he'll prove me wrong here and rebound to form quickly, but I didn't think that was his plan from what he's been doing this year and last (full scrub of the entire organization to rebuild, not a quick turnaround re-tool).
I hear you but lets not act like the bottom 18 are all scrubs. some solid teams there
100% agree. And I'd expect Bama to join you as, net record wise, you'll probably represent the least combined wins of the divisions after the first round. So maybe it all works out, but it sure feels weird this round.

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:13 pm
by shel311
Cnasty wrote:Sheltown on the clock
If I understand this all, the AJ/Riccio division is closed for me to pick, right?

If so, give me AL White, the one Nick is in. :)

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:13 pm
by DRWebs
dakshdar wrote:I saw that, but 0.002 percentage points on a 20+ season win percentage is trumping the fact that a Top 12 team in a now closed division finished a net 95.5 games out of first the last two seasons?

Shit, Port Orange finished a net 65 games ahead of NE the last two seasons -- and they're now supposed to represent the top of that division together?

This is not a dig at Dave, he's rebuilding and that's part of the process. I hope he'll prove me wrong here and rebound to form quickly, but I didn't think that was his plan from what he's been doing this year and last (full scrub of the entire organization to rebuild, not a quick turnaround re-tool).
Where were you during this entire process to say "Hey I think we should use X years for our sample size and here's the results"? You didn't say anything until it potentially affected you, and again put in what work to the discussion? Using the historical data was not me manipulating things to help myself, just presenting the most complete set of data. At any point, someone could have stepped forward and said okay let's vote on how many years to use since we had some want 3 and others saying 5, and I'm sure others having a different opinion. I think going forward we will need to determine how many years we will keep the divisions before redrafting and that will affect how many previous years to consider (IE keeping divisions for 3 years = using last 3 years for order).

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:15 pm
by GeorgesGoons
DRWebs wrote:
dakshdar wrote:I saw that, but 0.002 percentage points on a 20+ season win percentage is trumping the fact that a Top 12 team in a now closed division finished a net 95.5 games out of first the last two seasons?

Shit, Port Orange finished a net 65 games ahead of NE the last two seasons -- and they're now supposed to represent the top of that division together?

This is not a dig at Dave, he's rebuilding and that's part of the process. I hope he'll prove me wrong here and rebound to form quickly, but I didn't think that was his plan from what he's been doing this year and last (full scrub of the entire organization to rebuild, not a quick turnaround re-tool).
Where were you during this entire process to say "Hey I think we should use X years for our sample size and here's the results"? You didn't say anything until it potentially affected you, and again put in what work to the discussion? Using the historical data was not me manipulating things to help myself, just presenting the most complete set of data. At any point, someone could have stepped forward and said okay let's vote on how many years to use since we had some want 3 and others saying 5, and I'm sure others having a different opinion. I think going forward we will need to determine how many years we will keep the divisions before redrafting and that will affect how many previous years to consider (IE keeping divisions for 3 years = using last 3 years for order).
I don't think it affects him at all. Maybe I am not seeing the whole picture though

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:15 pm
by DRWebs
The_Niddler wrote:
DRWebs wrote:Jerry's browsing the forums praying Ry makes his selection before he has to ;)
Some of us work during the day, sorry! ;)
I thank you for working hard today so I don't have to! :D

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:16 pm
by GeorgesGoons
DRWebs wrote:
The_Niddler wrote:
DRWebs wrote:Jerry's browsing the forums praying Ry makes his selection before he has to ;)
Some of us work during the day, sorry! ;)
I thank you for working hard today so I don't have to! :D
Future Bernie Sanders voter right there :lol:

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:17 pm
by nick
shel311 wrote:
Cnasty wrote:Sheltown on the clock
If I understand this all, the AJ/Riccio division is closed for me to pick, right?

If so, give me AL White, the one Nick is in. :)
Image