NDL Forum

Lovely.

I have over in the FAU/ULL game and ULL scores to tie it at 48. OT it is; going over!

B. Gautier passed to V. Wolfe to the left for 43 yard touchdown. 2pt attempt failed, B. Gautier pass attempt

ASSHOLES! Shit, even if they made it, I was fucked.

Texans +1
Titans +1
Vikings -1
Browns +3
Bills -1.5

Texans +1
Vikings +1

Little late.

St. Louis

[230] DEN BRONCOS PK-105

Broncos +1
Rams +4.5
Seahawks +4
Cowboys +12

New England +5

[1240] 1H WAS REDSKINS +2½-115
[240] WAS REDSKINS +3½-120

Eagles -3

BsktbllJk wrote:Eagles -3

Sucka!!!!

trendon wrote:

BsktbllJk wrote:Eagles -3

Sucka!!!!

Wow!

trendon wrote:

BsktbllJk wrote:Eagles -3

Sucka!!!!

well im glad i was a sucka tonight

at least so far

By the way, let me explain the difference between "sucka" and "sucker." I was merely angry with him for picking against me; hence the "sucka" and not calling him a sucker for picking Philadelphia.

trendon wrote:By the way, let me explain the difference between "sucka" and "sucker." I was merely angry with him for picking against me; hence the "sucka" and not calling him a sucker for picking Philadelphia.

thanks for explaination as philly puts up their 45th point of the half

I'm interested to see what the hell this halftime line will look like

im guessing skins -3.5 o/u 24.5 just a guess

I really do not know why I am not taking the over on every game where at least one of the teams has a functionable offense. How many MONTHS did I scream about the UNDER? Three. It took me 70 days to finally give up on them. I may just play the OVER on every football game ever played where I feel confident that one offense can score.

It is fucking ridiculous. I looked at the over and decided to play Washington.

My washington post text alert update that always updates at the end of each quarter just sent "WASH POST REDSKINS ALERT: Redskins down 45-14 to Eagles at halftime. (Yes you read that right.)"

Even my phone is laughing at me