Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:00 am
At least he didn't sucker punch anyone this time!!!DRWebs wrote:Jeremy Hill pride and joy of LSU
Page 328 of 688
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:01 am
first of all the hit was clean and he was celebrating when they announced it was fumble
speaking of that play, it easily could have been returned for a TD, that was a huge play that didn't really get talked about
after that, holy shit, what a fiasco. That's why you don't have guys like Burfict and Pacman
speaking of that play, it easily could have been returned for a TD, that was a huge play that didn't really get talked about
after that, holy shit, what a fiasco. That's why you don't have guys like Burfict and Pacman
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:04 am
Lead with the crown right up under the chin. Should have been a penalty easily if they were going to call those others ones on the hits on Bryant and then brown
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:05 am
Spoken like a true Steelers fanDRiccio21 wrote:first of all the hit was clean and he was celebrating when they announced it was fumble
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:06 am
It actually was. They don't get call helmet to helmet on runners, only defensive players.DRWebs wrote:Spoken like a true Steelers fanDRiccio21 wrote:first of all the hit was clean and he was celebrating when they announced it was fumble
They talked about it after it happened.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:09 am
I still didn't see exactly what happened there. It didn't even look like Jones made contact himself, but utter stupidity to put himself near that situation.shel311 wrote:Definitely not gonna knight for Pacman here...but I don't think that deserved a 15 yard penalty, especially since it was with a coach of another team who was pretty clearly instigating.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:09 am
I'd disagree with their assessment. He was a receiver and made 2-3 steps and then was targetedshel311 wrote:It actually was. They don't get call helmet to helmet on runners, only defensive players.DRWebs wrote:Spoken like a true Steelers fanDRiccio21 wrote:first of all the hit was clean and he was celebrating when they announced it was fumble
They talked about it after it happened.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:12 am
What's done is done in the end, will be interesting to watch Big Bens status over the next week
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:13 am
If you take 2-3 steps, you are longer a receiver, you are a runner, I think that's almost exactly how the rule is worded.DRWebs wrote:I'd disagree with their assessment. He was a receiver and made 2-3 steps and then was targetedshel311 wrote:It actually was. They don't get call helmet to helmet on runners, only defensive players.DRWebs wrote:Spoken like a true Steelers fanDRiccio21 wrote:first of all the hit was clean and he was celebrating when they announced it was fumble
They talked about it after it happened.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:14 am
That was some Willis reed type shit right there.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:18 am
i'm not sure you understand the rule then.DRWebs wrote: I'd disagree with their assessment. He was a receiver and made 2-3 steps and then was targeted
the former head of officials explained the whole thing as it was happening. once he turned he doesn't get that protection and its legal. its brutal and vicious, but it's fair game. and my only point was that the play resulted in a fumble and he had tons of space ahead to return it. that was a huge swing
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:21 am
i agree, seemed like the ref lost his cool and was fed upshel311 wrote:Definitely not gonna knight for Pacman here...but I don't think that deserved a 15 yard penalty, especially since it was with a coach of another team who was pretty clearly instigating.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:27 am
https://www.instagram.com/p/BAWK0zgEjmb/
Not sure if this link will work, but I'm with you Pacman, but you still had one of the biggest melts I've seen.
Not sure if this link will work, but I'm with you Pacman, but you still had one of the biggest melts I've seen.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:29 am
i didn't see it, but someone said he took a swing at Porter.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 3:21 am
CHEATERS!!!"Either or both team attendants and their helpers may enter the field to attend their team during a team timeout by either team. No other non-player may come on the field without the Referee’s permission, unless he is an incoming substitute (5-2-2).
PROTEST!!!
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:54 am
Can we all agree that listening to Mike Carey is painful? Guy is terrible and offers the same amount of insight that any dude sitting in the stands could
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:03 am
Weasel wrote:Can we all agree that listening to Mike Carey is painful? Guy is terrible and offers the same amount of insight that any dude sitting in the stands could
So bad.
Pick any other random official and pay them instead. He's so bad. And he's actually wrong a lot too
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:07 am
DRiccio21 wrote:i'm not sure you understand the rule then.DRWebs wrote: I'd disagree with their assessment. He was a receiver and made 2-3 steps and then was targeted
the former head of officials explained the whole thing as it was happening. once he turned he doesn't get that protection and its legal. its brutal and vicious, but it's fair game. and my only point was that the play resulted in a fumble and he had tons of space ahead to return it. that was a huge swing
Defenseless or not. Runner or not. Can't lead with crown of the helmet. No?
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:08 am
nope you can't, i was wrong. Carey explained it wrong too
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:17 am
http://993espn.com/2015/09/23/former-rb ... ingle-mom/
In uplifting news.
In uplifting news.