Re: 2047 Season Thread-Oh Canada!
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2017 1:21 pm
It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
Yea no shit. Now you're just a useless tattletale lolajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
How badly do you want to resolve this issue?cougnix wrote:Nothing. I don't have an option to do anything with him. If I drag him anywhere it gives some stupid message.shel311 wrote:What happens if Coug tries to put drag/drop him from his 40 man and onto his 25 man? I know I would be trying that if I were Coug
OOTP 18 fixes that. Tells you who the little bitches are.Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Yea no shit. Now you're just a useless tattletale lolajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
Boston_Rob wrote:OOTP 18 fixes that. Tells you who the little bitches are.Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Yea no shit. Now you're just a useless tattletale lolajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
ajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
How'd you figure out who it was?GeorgesGoons wrote:ajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
I had that issue a couple of seasons back. Ended up being the guy with a good attitude and everyone else was pissed
George is a detective, shel.shel311 wrote:How'd you figure out who it was?GeorgesGoons wrote:ajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
I had that issue a couple of seasons back. Ended up being the guy with a good attitude and everyone else was pissed
In my opinion it throws off a lot of ratings. Maybe that is why scouting variance is so high! But then again you look at FUJI and he is an 80/80Uuaww wrote:I don't like that in 17 defense and speed are equal parts it seems in the ratings. Cusack is like a 74 potential player according to this game which is not right.
I just told you.shel311 wrote:How'd you figure out who it was?GeorgesGoons wrote:ajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
I had that issue a couple of seasons back. Ended up being the guy with a good attitude and everyone else was pissed
Well no, you told me who it was, you didn't tell me how you figured it out.GeorgesGoons wrote:I just told you.shel311 wrote:How'd you figure out who it was?GeorgesGoons wrote:ajalves wrote:It would be nice if that when guys complain about the "bickering in the clubhouse like middle schoolers" that they would be specific about who it is
I had that issue a couple of seasons back. Ended up being the guy with a good attitude and everyone else was pissed
The happy guy was the culprit. Demoted him to AAA and the team played better
My scout doesn't have him as a blue potential, have him in the lower greens. Still undecided about my scout, but this makes me feel a little bettershel311 wrote:Yea, basically if you don't have speed/fielding it doesn't hurt you that much if you're a great hitter. But a shit hitter who is fast and good defensively, it probably does overrate them on some level.
My scout has Cusack at blue potential, which is silly IMO. You can be blue potential without speed+defense, but I don't think you can be blue potential if you're a terrible hitter.
I mean how much is defense really worth? If he could bat like... .275 with .350 OBP that would be amazing.Wasted Memory wrote:My scout doesn't have him as a blue potential, have him in the lower greens. Still undecided about my scout, but this makes me feel a little bettershel311 wrote:Yea, basically if you don't have speed/fielding it doesn't hurt you that much if you're a great hitter. But a shit hitter who is fast and good defensively, it probably does overrate them on some level.
My scout has Cusack at blue potential, which is silly IMO. You can be blue potential without speed+defense, but I don't think you can be blue potential if you're a terrible hitter.
Blue for blue trade! cusack for payne! He alone will be able to make up for the shitty defense around him!Cnasty wrote:Considering I can't move Foster looking at a Foster/Rivera/Payne outfield. Yuck!
They better score 3 runs a game each to make up for it.
Literally no one feels sorry for youCnasty wrote:Considering I can't move Foster looking at a Foster/Rivera/Payne outfield. Yuck!
They better score 3 runs a game each to make up for it.