Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:37 am
I could be wrong... but I think it was a planned rub route.. that didn't rub. The pass would have been thrown before the ILB came into play.
ajalves wrote:The kid from the Pats made a great play. I actually "yelled" a bit
It was shocking.
Traffic? What traffic? It was one on one on the outside. The guy made a great jump on it, unless that's the traffic you are referring to.ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
Whittness10 wrote:Traffic? What traffic? It was one on one on the outside. The guy made a great jump on it, unless that's the traffic you are referring to.ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
this. ball gets batted up on the inside stands to reason there are more chances to INT it. thats, 'what traffic'ReignOnU wrote:Whittness10 wrote:Traffic? What traffic? It was one on one on the outside. The guy made a great jump on it, unless that's the traffic you are referring to.ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
I think he was referring to the fact that it was a slant going towards the ILB/S.
you would destroy someone for a post like this.ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
No shit
Yeah AJ is one of the biggest dicks around when it comes to "no shit" posts. That's why I like to call him out when he says something retarded.DRiccio21 wrote:you would destroy someone for a post like this.ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
i'll pretend i'm AJ here:
No shit
naaaaah. You're painting me all wrongDRiccio21 wrote:you would destroy someone for a post like this.ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
i'll pretend i'm AJ here:
No shit
The inside receiver was definitely trying to drive his defender into the deeper defender to create a rub, or get into position for contact with the second defender himself. The Pats defender on the insider receiver actually looks like he does a great job of not allowing the secondary contact to occur.ReignOnU wrote:I could be wrong... but I think it was a planned rub route.. that didn't rub. The pass would have been thrown before the ILB came into play.
I have to fucking reinstall.The_Niddler wrote:trendon, how about you take some of this posting time and export your OOTP team?
Yea, I think the bigger issue is the inside the hashes pass, moreso than run vs passajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
There was a pic going around Twitter of the kid in the commercial's face, and it said, "I would have given it to Lynch...but I died."Cnasty wrote:There were so many serious, downright depressing ads during a fun event like the super bowl that no one looks forward to the commercials anymore.
That nationwide one was just terrible and the last thing I want to do is watch an ad about my kid dying while eating my pork butt sandwich!!