Page 262 of 688

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:37 am
by ReignOnU
I could be wrong... but I think it was a planned rub route.. that didn't rub. The pass would have been thrown before the ILB came into play.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:39 am
by ajalves
The kid from the Pats made a great play. I actually "yelled" a bit

It was shocking.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:42 am
by ReignOnU
ajalves wrote:The kid from the Pats made a great play. I actually "yelled" a bit

It was shocking.

Definitely was a tremendous play.

Just imagine, a moment earlier, he was the defender that was covering on that ridiculous reception.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:44 am
by Whittness10
ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.

If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
Traffic? What traffic? It was one on one on the outside. The guy made a great jump on it, unless that's the traffic you are referring to.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:46 am
by ReignOnU

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:47 am
by ReignOnU
Whittness10 wrote:
ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.

If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
Traffic? What traffic? It was one on one on the outside. The guy made a great jump on it, unless that's the traffic you are referring to.

I think he was referring to the fact that it was a slant going towards the ILB/S.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:48 am
by ReignOnU

That must have been a helluva Super Bowl party.

EDIT: (he actually entered last week apparently)

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:00 pm
by ajalves
ReignOnU wrote:
Whittness10 wrote:
ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.

If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
Traffic? What traffic? It was one on one on the outside. The guy made a great jump on it, unless that's the traffic you are referring to.

I think he was referring to the fact that it was a slant going towards the ILB/S.
this. ball gets batted up on the inside stands to reason there are more chances to INT it. thats, 'what traffic'

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:09 pm
by DRiccio21
ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
you would destroy someone for a post like this.

i'll pretend i'm AJ here:
No shit

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:20 pm
by Whittness10
DRiccio21 wrote:
ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
you would destroy someone for a post like this.

i'll pretend i'm AJ here:
No shit
Yeah AJ is one of the biggest dicks around when it comes to "no shit" posts. That's why I like to call him out when he says something retarded.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:31 pm
by ajalves
DRiccio21 wrote:
ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.
you would destroy someone for a post like this.

i'll pretend i'm AJ here:
No shit
naaaaah. You're painting me all wrong

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:49 pm
by dakshdar
ReignOnU wrote:I could be wrong... but I think it was a planned rub route.. that didn't rub. The pass would have been thrown before the ILB came into play.
The inside receiver was definitely trying to drive his defender into the deeper defender to create a rub, or get into position for contact with the second defender himself. The Pats defender on the insider receiver actually looks like he does a great job of not allowing the secondary contact to occur.

That's what it looked like to me at least.


Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:55 pm
by trendon
Yeah, no doubt that was a planned rub route. Browner made a great play.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:01 pm
by The_Niddler
trendon, how about you take some of this posting time and export your OOTP team? :D

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:03 pm
by trendon
The_Niddler wrote:trendon, how about you take some of this posting time and export your OOTP team? :D
I have to fucking reinstall.

But. notice, they are winning lately.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:12 pm
by The_Niddler
I know you stated you were having trouble.
Let me know if you need anything from me. I PMd you my cell #.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:20 pm
by trendon
Can you help me with my laziness? :)

I'll get back on board tonight.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:43 pm
by nick
LMAO the left shark has no fucking idea what he's doing but this was the best part of the SB. Whole thing was a trip


Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:44 pm
by shel311
ajalves wrote:I didnt like the playcall. However, its not 100% they would have scored had they run. I think he would have, but its not 100% is all I am saying.

If you are going to pass, why to the inside in traffic?
Yea, I think the bigger issue is the inside the hashes pass, moreso than run vs pass

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:45 pm
by shel311
Cnasty wrote:There were so many serious, downright depressing ads during a fun event like the super bowl that no one looks forward to the commercials anymore.

That nationwide one was just terrible and the last thing I want to do is watch an ad about my kid dying while eating my pork butt sandwich!!
There was a pic going around Twitter of the kid in the commercial's face, and it said, "I would have given it to Lynch...but I died." :lol: