Page 243 of 688

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:55 am
by shel311
Funniest Packsyism in a bit.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:57 am
by ajalves
packsyd2284 wrote:Why is Jason only defending Cobb and horsy Nelson and not TY Hilton and some other colt WRs? My guess.....isn't randall Cobb and former uk wildcat?
Image

Welcome to the party pal....

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:22 pm
by trendon
Weasel wrote:Fuck your math
FUCK THIS TOPIC!

Seriously, though, I have never seen anything like this.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:24 pm
by shel311
trendon wrote:Seriously, though, I have never seen anything like this.
Not sure if you mean DeflateGate or thinking Nelson/Cobb are both elite. :lol:

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:28 pm
by trendon
shel311 wrote:
trendon wrote:Seriously, though, I have never seen anything like this.
Not sure if you mean DeflateGate or thinking Nelson/Cobb are both elite. :lol:
Well, now that I know what this other topic is about ... both.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:39 pm
by nick
Bellichek is denying he knew anything about it. sad.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:40 pm
by shel311
trendon wrote:Well, now that I know what this other topic is about ... both.
Good stuff. I'm with you on DeflateGate too, who cares. Brad Johnson admitted to actually paying money to scuff up balls for a Super Bowl, and no one really cares.

If this came about, same story, but about Seattle, it's barely a story, I'm guessing.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:41 pm
by shel311
nick wrote:Bellichek is denying he knew anything about it. sad.
1. It can't be possible that he didn't?

2. What other thing would you expect or advise him to say if he did know?

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:48 pm
by cougnix
shel311 wrote:
trendon wrote:Well, now that I know what this other topic is about ... both.
Good stuff. I'm with you on DeflateGate too, who cares. Brad Johnson admitted to actually paying money to scuff up balls for a Super Bowl, and no one really cares.

If this came about, same story, but about Seattle, it's barely a story, I'm guessing.
Because Seattle doesn't have an Elite Quarterback, so it is obvious it wouldn't be a story. And I don't mean that snarky...Tom Brady shouldn't need to have a ball underinflated to do what he can do. Now, take the fact you have Edelmann and Amendola catching balls, you may believe that they would have a hard time catching an inflated ball. Sheesh, I think it's funny how big of a deal this has become. And I also think it's funny how people like Brad Johnson are quick to point out that they bent the rules when they played and that makes it a nonissue. What is going to come of this is a new rule about how the balls are handled pregame, just like the rules have changed about the kicking balls.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:55 pm
by jsence2
packsyd2284 wrote:Why is Jason only defending Cobb and horsy Nelson and not TY Hilton and some other colt WRs? My guess.....isn't randall Cobb and former uk wildcat?

Not sure what's funnier

1) Horsy Nelson
2) Pat bringing up some random WR into the argument out of left field, when he has nothing to do with what was being discussed
3) Pat not getting anybody to bite the first time he insinuated that I'm supporting a player because he went to UK (not because he's a Pro Bowl level player), so he posted it again a page later, and still nobody biting

Probably gonna go with Horsy Nelson just because of the lasting value :lol:

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:00 pm
by nick
cougnix wrote:
shel311 wrote:
trendon wrote:Well, now that I know what this other topic is about ... both.
Good stuff. I'm with you on DeflateGate too, who cares. Brad Johnson admitted to actually paying money to scuff up balls for a Super Bowl, and no one really cares.

If this came about, same story, but about Seattle, it's barely a story, I'm guessing.
Because Seattle doesn't have an Elite Quarterback, so it is obvious it wouldn't be a story. And I don't mean that snarky...Tom Brady shouldn't need to have a ball underinflated to do what he can do. Now, take the fact you have Edelmann and Amendola catching balls, you may believe that they would have a hard time catching an inflated ball. Sheesh, I think it's funny how big of a deal this has become. And I also think it's funny how people like Brad Johnson are quick to point out that they bent the rules when they played and that makes it a nonissue. What is going to come of this is a new rule about how the balls are handled pregame, just like the rules have changed about the kicking balls.
you draft white WRs for possession and black WR's for speed/athleticism. Amendola and Edelmen would catch anything less than a boulder being thrown at them

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:05 pm
by cougnix
nick wrote:
cougnix wrote:
shel311 wrote:
trendon wrote:Well, now that I know what this other topic is about ... both.
Good stuff. I'm with you on DeflateGate too, who cares. Brad Johnson admitted to actually paying money to scuff up balls for a Super Bowl, and no one really cares.

If this came about, same story, but about Seattle, it's barely a story, I'm guessing.
Because Seattle doesn't have an Elite Quarterback, so it is obvious it wouldn't be a story. And I don't mean that snarky...Tom Brady shouldn't need to have a ball underinflated to do what he can do. Now, take the fact you have Edelmann and Amendola catching balls, you may believe that they would have a hard time catching an inflated ball. Sheesh, I think it's funny how big of a deal this has become. And I also think it's funny how people like Brad Johnson are quick to point out that they bent the rules when they played and that makes it a nonissue. What is going to come of this is a new rule about how the balls are handled pregame, just like the rules have changed about the kicking balls.
you draft white WRs for possession and black WR's for speed/athleticism. Amendola and Edelmen would catch anything less than a boulder being thrown at them
You really aren't good at sarcasm Sheldon Cooper...

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:17 pm
by OracleHCR
shel311 wrote:
trendon wrote:Well, now that I know what this other topic is about ... both.
Good stuff. I'm with you on DeflateGate too, who cares. Brad Johnson admitted to actually paying money to scuff up balls for a Super Bowl, and no one really cares.

If this came about, same story, but about Seattle, it's barely a story, I'm guessing.
The difference with the Brad Johnson incident is that what was done wasn't specifically against the rules. From what I read, in the Superbowl the teams use the same balls and all the balls were scuffed so no advantage went to either team. If what the Patriots are being accused of is true then that is specifically against the rules and therefore cheating. Does anyone who isn't a Colts fan actually think it affected the game? No. But the intent was to give their QB an advantage by breaking the rules.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:17 pm
by shel311
Espn's headline: Belichick "shocked", shifts attention to Brady"


The article wasn't remotely like the title, which insinuates he was blaming Brady.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:23 pm
by cougnix
shel311 wrote:Espn's headline: Belichick "shocked", shifts attention to Brady"


The article wasn't remotely like the title, which insinuates he was blaming Brady.
Listening to sports radio this morning they made this same comment. Since Belichick is basically saying "I didn't know, and I'm learning more about the ball preparation than I ever knew" is deflecting the issue to someone else. Whether intentional or not, most are now saying that since he is wiping his hands clean that it has to be Brady that asked for this. But the biggest thing they said was, whether he knew or not, saying he had no idea basically guarantees that there won't be a quick resolve and that he will have no repercussions for the Super Bowl and that a long drawn out investigation will be done lasting longer that the week and a half now before the game.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:27 pm
by trendon
By the way, all of the references to Spygate just remind me how terribly ignorant everyone is/was to what actually happened there.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:30 pm
by ajalves
who cares about 2 lbs PSI.

i understand there is a difference. However, to me its no different than a pitcher with pine tar on the brim of his hat or a hockey player shaving his stick down a bit more than "allowed" (if thats even a thing)

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:35 pm
by nick
cougnix wrote:
nick wrote:
cougnix wrote:
shel311 wrote:
trendon wrote:Well, now that I know what this other topic is about ... both.
Good stuff. I'm with you on DeflateGate too, who cares. Brad Johnson admitted to actually paying money to scuff up balls for a Super Bowl, and no one really cares.

If this came about, same story, but about Seattle, it's barely a story, I'm guessing.
Because Seattle doesn't have an Elite Quarterback, so it is obvious it wouldn't be a story. And I don't mean that snarky...Tom Brady shouldn't need to have a ball underinflated to do what he can do. Now, take the fact you have Edelmann and Amendola catching balls, you may believe that they would have a hard time catching an inflated ball. Sheesh, I think it's funny how big of a deal this has become. And I also think it's funny how people like Brad Johnson are quick to point out that they bent the rules when they played and that makes it a nonissue. What is going to come of this is a new rule about how the balls are handled pregame, just like the rules have changed about the kicking balls.
you draft white WRs for possession and black WR's for speed/athleticism. Amendola and Edelmen would catch anything less than a boulder being thrown at them
You really aren't good at sarcasm Sheldon Cooper...
its 9am in Seattle and youre already blowing gaskets. can only imagine what your systolic and diastolic are.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:35 pm
by nick
ajalves wrote:who cares about 2 lbs PSI.

i understand there is a difference. However, to me its no different than a pitcher with pine tar on the brim of his hat or a hockey player shaving his stick down a bit more than "allowed" (if thats even a thing)
hockey its curved sticks

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:36 pm
by trendon
ajalves wrote:who cares about 2 lbs PSI.
By the way, 2 PSI below what? Minimum, maximum, or average? ESPN doesn't seem to want to clarify that.