Penn St

Post by **ReignOnU** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:21 am

Here's some potential twists that could explain more...

...what if McQ was actually a victim?
He grew up in State College... 2yrs older than Jon Sandusky, Jerry's son. Played HS football with him.

...what is McQ's dad actually knew Jerry's history and influenced what McQ told Paterno?

LetsGoPeay · Post by **LetsGoPeay** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:24 am

ReignOnU wrote:Here's some potential twists that could explain more...

...what if McQ was actually a victim?
He grew up in State College... 2yrs older than Jon Sandusky, Jerry's son. Played HS football with him.

Hmmmm, I wonder if someone might have said this two pages ago?

Post by **DRiccio21** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:28 am

this thread is turning into the hall of fame prank thread where every post gets repeated

Post by **ReignOnU** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:33 am

Damn you Peay, I was distracted by the reposting of the perverted book title. I get a redo!

nick · Post by **nick** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:02 am

buckeye76 wrote:
The_Niddler wrote:
jsence2 wrote:
The_Niddler wrote:If an older woman going after younger men is a cougar, and an older man going after younger women is a manther,....is an older man going after younger boys a Nittany Lion?

Too soon?

If you're posting this as a new joke, horrible.

If you're posting it in response to it being posted the first two times, well played.

Sorry jsence and nick, I was at the bar and my buddy sent it to me in a text, I wanted to share it. I, obviously, did not read the prior posts.
Screw em JD.

not literally, you might have a penn state situation on your hands

brwnbear · Post by **brwnbear** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:09 am

Cunit879 wrote:Has anyone seen the rumor from yesterday alleging that Sandusky was pimping the kids to rich PSU donors

The rumor is that he is pimping out kids to rich donors of the charity. They of course may also be PSU donors, but thats not what the rumor is suppose to be. The guy that started the rumor (Maddon) did a piss poor job explaining that fact and it was later confirmed by a few of his colleges who followed up with him.

Still shitty of course but shows you how these things take a life of their own.

Also, the reporter who first wrote about the DA said the case files mentioned that the hard drive was never recovered and the laptop was damaged (it was found in a lake) beyond use. She never mentioned anything about detectives being able to read anything on it. So unless the hard drive has been found 10+ years later I dont think thats accurate.

LetsGoPeay · Post by **LetsGoPeay** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:13 am

brwnbear wrote:Also, the reporter who first wrote about the DA said the case files mentioned that the hard drive was never recovered and the laptop was damaged (it was found in a lake) beyond use. She never mentioned anything about detectives being able to read anything on it. So unless the hard drive has been found 10+ years later I dont think thats accurate.

Again! Am I blocked? Does everyone hate me?

brwnbear · Post by **brwnbear** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:18 am

Sorry peay, somehow missed your post

Post by **DRiccio21** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:20 am

there's a really tasteless joke out there about this situation, i just can't put my finger on it.

LetsGoPeay · Post by **LetsGoPeay** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:23 am

DRiccio21 wrote:i just can't put my finger on it.

Did you just make it?

trendon · Post by **trendon** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:37 pm

http://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/2 ... ng-paterno

"The board of trustees got it wrong. They should have consulted the victims before making a decision on Mr. Paterno...They should have considered these victims watch TV and are aware of the students' reaction and may not want to be associated with the downfall of Mr. Paterno. The school instead elected to do what it felt was in its own best interest at the time. Isn’t that what put the school in this position in the first place?"

Post by **shel311** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:39 pm

trendon wrote:http://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/2 ... ng-paterno

"The board of trustees got it wrong. They should have consulted the victims before making a decision on Mr. Paterno...They should have considered these victims watch TV and are aware of the students' reaction and may not want to be associated with the downfall of Mr. Paterno. The school instead elected to do what it felt was in its own best interest at the time. Isn’t that what put the school in this position in the first place?"

That's ridiculous and not remotely thought out very well lol.

Post by **ReignOnU** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:03 pm

That's the statement from the lawyer of the victims. I read that yesterday. Still kind of strange.

1 mother has come out saying Paterno was rightfully fired, 1 sister of a victim has come out and said that he shouldn't have been. A lot of mixed feelings on it.

Post by **shel311** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:04 pm

ReignOnU wrote:That's the statement from the lawyer of the victims. I read that yesterday. Still kind of strange.

1 mother has come out saying Paterno was rightfully fired, 1 sister of a victim has come out and said that he shouldn't have been. A lot of mixed feelings on it.

Sounds harsh or whatever, but the victims and their families are some of the last people who we should take advice from on how to handle this situation. They're not exactly looking at it from the right standpoint, through ZERO fault of their own obviously.

Shiftdnb · Post by **Shiftdnb** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:14 pm

I think they're making that statement cause they're afraid of anyone targeting them for the loss of JoePa. Hell people were rioting, the DA is missing along with a HD from a laptop, no telling what stupid people will do these days for the love of a coach.

Post by **ReignOnU** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:17 pm

Rioting... yeah, not really.

Post by **ReignOnU** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:59 pm

Pretty good reason why Sandusky had an office on campus... (as in... wtf!?!?!?)

http://www.wyff4.com/news/29738465/deta ... um=twitter

calbrs04 · Post by **calbrs04** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:14 pm

Can you imagine if for some reason, some how, Sandusky ends up being innocent? IF that were to happen, imagine the lawsuits that would come out of this. Like I said, this is one of those what if's.

Post by **ReignOnU** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:15 pm

ReignOnU wrote:Pretty good reason why Sandusky had an office on campus... (as in... wtf!?!?!?)

http://www.wyff4.com/news/29738465/deta ... um=twitter

This is picking up steam already and starting to pop up on more and more websites... guessing this is going to hit ESPN by the end of the day.

Post by **shel311** » Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:17 pm

ReignOnU wrote:
ReignOnU wrote:Pretty good reason why Sandusky had an office on campus... (as in... wtf!?!?!?)

http://www.wyff4.com/news/29738465/deta ... um=twitter

This is picking up steam already and starting to pop up on more and more websites... guessing this is going to hit ESPN by the end of the day.

Is that the right link?

I don't get what the link has to do with Sandusky's office campus lol.

NDL Forum

Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St

Re: Penn St