Page 24 of 688

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:11 am
by dakshdar
DRWebs wrote:
Fan too proud wrote:
That's a bad lock.
Why is it preposterous that once a week for ~20 weeks out of each year I spare 3 hours to watch 1 game? They're either on TV (often for me now since there is no LA area NFC team and since they're on primetime often) or I go to a local bar (when I lived in Virginia for three years there was a "Giants Bar" that only showed that game so I was there every weekend, and here in Manhattan Beach there is a sports bar ten minutes from where I live if I walk there that I watch all non-broadcast games).

I think you're over-estimating the difficulty in watching one team play once a week for football season.

I bet there are multiple guys in here that do the same for their team, whether it's NFL or college.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:27 am
by shel311
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... r-schiano/

I know this means nothing to the "cheap shot" "unwritten rules" guys, but I don't see how it's irrelevant.

The Bucs should stop trying when they want to stop trying or when the game is over. NYG should not get to dictate when everyone gets to stop trying.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:30 am
by ajalves
shel311 wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... r-schiano/

I know this means nothing to the "cheap shot" "unwritten rules" guys, but I don't see how it's irrelevant.

The Bucs should stop trying when they want to stop trying or when the game is over. NYG should not get to dictate when everyone gets to stop trying.

everything is black and white!!!!!!!!! literal!!!!!

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:31 am
by shel311
ajalves wrote:
shel311 wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... r-schiano/

I know this means nothing to the "cheap shot" "unwritten rules" guys, but I don't see how it's irrelevant.

The Bucs should stop trying when they want to stop trying or when the game is over. NYG should not get to dictate when everyone gets to stop trying.

everything is black and white!!!!!!!!! literal!!!!!
The guy forced TWO fumbles in one season with that tactic, what's the problem again? That NYG gets to decide when to stop trying? Effff that :lol:

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:34 am
by ajalves
shel311 wrote:
ajalves wrote:
shel311 wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... r-schiano/

I know this means nothing to the "cheap shot" "unwritten rules" guys, but I don't see how it's irrelevant.

The Bucs should stop trying when they want to stop trying or when the game is over. NYG should not get to dictate when everyone gets to stop trying.

everything is black and white!!!!!!!!! literal!!!!!
The guy forced TWO fumbles in one season with that tactic, what's the problem again? That NYG gets to decide when to stop trying? Effff that :lol:
false hustle FTW!!!!!

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:35 am
by BFiVL
Unless I read it wrong, they didn't force two fumbles shel.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:35 am
by sammy33
I'm just grateful to see the Bucs giving effort in the fourth quarter. Didn't see much of that during the back half of last season. I guess there should be a segment of pissed of people for Romeo calling timeouts at the end of the Bills game? No? Coughlin needs to shut up (though I slightly agree with him).

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:36 am
by shel311
BFiVL wrote:Unless I read it wrong, they didn't force two fumbles shel.
One was offsides, if that's what you mean lol.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:36 am
by shel311
ajalves wrote:
shel311 wrote:
ajalves wrote:
shel311 wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... r-schiano/

I know this means nothing to the "cheap shot" "unwritten rules" guys, but I don't see how it's irrelevant.

The Bucs should stop trying when they want to stop trying or when the game is over. NYG should not get to dictate when everyone gets to stop trying.

everything is black and white!!!!!!!!! literal!!!!!
The guy forced TWO fumbles in one season with that tactic, what's the problem again? That NYG gets to decide when to stop trying? Effff that :lol:
false hustle FTW!!!!!
Irrelevance ftw

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:38 am
by ajalves
sammy33 wrote:I'm just grateful to see the Bucs giving effort in the fourth quarter. Didn't see much of that during the back half of last season. I guess there should be a segment of pissed of people for Romeo calling timeouts at the end of the Bills game? No? Coughlin needs to shut up (though I slightly agree with him).
with all due respect Samuel, you mean effort in the last 6 seconds of the 4th quarter. Because the other parts of the 4th quarter they gave up 25 points :lol:

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:40 am
by sammy33
I'm not the dumbass calling single man coverage with a safety blitz every play after it clearly wasn't working. Doesn't mean our little guys didn't do their best while getting roasted!

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:41 am
by ajalves
sammy33 wrote:I'm not the dumbass calling single man coverage with a safety blitz every play after it clearly wasn't working. Doesn't mean our little guys didn't do their best while getting roasted!
Get Monte K. back

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:43 am
by ReignOnU
False hustle, lol...

...reminds me of a stat that our DC kept track of in HS... he called it JOP. (Jump On Pile)

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:43 am
by DRiccio21
shel311 wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... r-schiano/

I know this means nothing to the "cheap shot" "unwritten rules" guys, but I don't see how it's irrelevant.

The Bucs should stop trying when they want to stop trying or when the game is over. NYG should not get to dictate when everyone gets to stop trying.
they had to knock the ball loose, recover it in a pile of about 20 people and then return it for a TD.

can we just step into reality for one second here? even if the fumble was caused, thats 1/3 of what was necessary.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:47 am
by shel311
DRiccio21 wrote:
shel311 wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... r-schiano/

I know this means nothing to the "cheap shot" "unwritten rules" guys, but I don't see how it's irrelevant.

The Bucs should stop trying when they want to stop trying or when the game is over. NYG should not get to dictate when everyone gets to stop trying.
they had to knock the ball loose, recover it in a pile of about 20 people and then return it for a TD.

can we just step into reality for one second here? even if the fumble was caused, thats 1/3 of what was necessary.
You're making assumptions to support your argument. I can assume the fumble would go backwards or sideways, cause you never know where a fumble is going to go.

Even if they don't score on that play, they get the ball with a second or 2 and can run a hail mary. ANd like you said, when on offense, odds don't matter you go for it!!! :)

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:48 am
by ajalves
DRiccio21 wrote: can we just step into reality
Shel doesnt live here, I've mentioned this before :lol:

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:48 am
by DRiccio21
and i'm not saying they should quit. they shouldn't. they should play til the final whistle... which is what you keep getting at.

they just shouldn't go shooting at guys knees like they did. thats not cool in the 1st quarter on 1st and 10 or in victory formation. its dangerous and unnecessary.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:52 am
by shel311
ajalves wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote: can we just step into reality
Shel doesnt live here, I've mentioned this before :lol:
I'm a neighbor. You're in some far off galaxy compared to reality. :P

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:43 am
by BFiVL
Big mike was injured on a similar play. Never played another down of DIII football.

Re: NFL Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:50 am
by sammy33
Monte...that cuts deep Mr. Alves.