Page 22 of 252

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:18 am
by DRWebs
shel311 wrote:
OracleHCR wrote:All I know is that we are fucked this presidential election. No third party will win and that leaves one who is crazy and one who is a criminal.
Blame everyone, all the millions, who vote for a democrat or republican religiously and blindly. :)
Blows my mind

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:25 am
by Crowes
GeorgesGoons wrote:
shel311 wrote:
OracleHCR wrote:All I know is that we are fucked this presidential election. No third party will win and that leaves one who is crazy and one who is a criminal.
Blame everyone, all the millions, who vote for a democrat or republican religiously and blindly. :)
And blame them all for re-electing these crooked politicians.

It's going to be scary but I'd rather have Trump in there over Hillary.

In a perfect world Gary Johnson would win.

In an even more perfect world Mad Dog General James Mattis would be president!
In my perfect world Bernie would run 3rd party and the never trump peeps would run a 3rd party candidate resulting in the destruction of both republican and democratic parties. A man can dream cant he. :lol:

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:28 am
by dakshdar
Still to me there should be dozens of people that deserve the ire being cast at one person. Something like this doesn't happen for four years with many people allowing it and being a part of it. That part of it doesn't seem to get brought up though.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:30 am
by GeorgesGoons
dakshdar wrote:Still to me there should be dozens of people that deserve the ire being cast at one person. Something like this doesn't happen for four years with many people allowing it and being a part of it. That part of it doesn't seem to get brought up though.
100% agree. But those dozens of people are not running for President! They should be charged as well

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:47 am
by OracleHCR
GeorgesGoons wrote:Honestly, I don't think Slick Willy had any leverage on this situation.
Really? You don't think he could be acting as a proxy offering her the same position or a higher level cabinet position?

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 11:02 am
by GeorgesGoons
OracleHCR wrote:
GeorgesGoons wrote:Honestly, I don't think Slick Willy had any leverage on this situation.
Really? You don't think he could be acting as a proxy offering her the same position or a higher level cabinet position?
It's possible but I just don't think he would jeopardize everything with the bright lights on him and his wife.

I am not a fan of either one and actually lean more to the side of despising them both. Just don't think he is that stupid. But he was getting head in the Oval Office so...

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 11:29 am
by OracleHCR
Knowing Bill the meeting may have had nothing to do with the investigation. He might have been tapping it.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:09 pm
by shel311

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:26 pm
by Cnasty
She's pretty hot and Michelle Obama is not.

Approved.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:40 pm
by shel311
Cnasty wrote:She's pretty hot
And 46 years old.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:50 pm
by Cnasty
Which makes it even hotter for me at my old ass age.

I was reading about this and supposedly they have the same speech writer, the whole speech was 45 minutes, and this was only 3 or 4 minutes of it?

That speech writer needs to make sure he is noting when he has used some of his greatest work not to recycle it!!

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:23 pm
by Weasel
Holy shit thats Trumps wife?! Good for him

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:36 pm
by shel311
Weasel wrote:Holy shit thats Trumps wife?! Good for him
Yea, yea pretty much.

She'll be the only redeeming quality of a potential Trump presidency.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:02 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
shel311 wrote:
Weasel wrote:Holy shit thats Trumps wife?! Good for him
Yea, yea pretty much.

She'll be the only redeeming quality of a potential Trump presidency.

Sadly shed be the only redeeming quality of either of these morons.

Seriously guys, one of these 2 idiots is going to be our president for 4 years. Let that sink in.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:07 pm
by shel311
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:
shel311 wrote:
Weasel wrote:Holy shit thats Trumps wife?! Good for him
Yea, yea pretty much.

She'll be the only redeeming quality of a potential Trump presidency.

Sadly shed be the only redeeming quality of either of these morons.

Seriously guys, one of these 2 idiots is going to be our president for 4 years. Let that sink in.
Gary Johnson!!!!

I legit just don't get how people will vote for either of them 2.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:08 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
shel311 wrote:
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:
shel311 wrote:
Weasel wrote:Holy shit thats Trumps wife?! Good for him
Yea, yea pretty much.

She'll be the only redeeming quality of a potential Trump presidency.

Sadly shed be the only redeeming quality of either of these morons.

Seriously guys, one of these 2 idiots is going to be our president for 4 years. Let that sink in.
Gary Johnson!!!!

I legit just don't get how people will vote for either of them 2.

I like voting for the idea of Gary Johnson. Kind of like Perot back in the day. Maybe people would actually believe in the chance for a 3rd party after all this

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:30 pm
by GeorgesGoons
Seeitsaveit13 wrote: Maybe people would actually believe in the chance for a 3rd party after all this

Not a chance. He doesn't have the (D) or (R) next to his name. Americans are too damn stupid and will only vote for someone with a (D) or (R) next to their name. Not saying Gary Johnson is the answer, but he sure as hell seems like the answer over Donald and definitely more than Hillary

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:34 am
by Seeitsaveit13
GeorgesGoons wrote:
Seeitsaveit13 wrote: Maybe people would actually believe in the chance for a 3rd party after all this

Not a chance. He doesn't have the (D) or (R) next to his name. Americans are too damn stupid and will only vote for someone with a (D) or (R) next to their name. Not saying Gary Johnson is the answer, but he sure as hell seems like the answer over Donald and definitely more than Hillary
I'm not saying he would win. But if he could at least get a decent chunk of votes, it could possibly give some momentum to the idea of a 3rd party vote not being a "wasted vote" as most people (like yourself, no offense) just toss it away.

"I'd give it a try, but it would just be a waste"

If all the people that said that, just gave it a try, it wouldn't be a waste anymore.

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:36 am
by shel311
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:"I'd give it a try, but it would just be a waste"
Those people are dummies :)

Re: 2016 Presidential Election

Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:44 am
by GeorgesGoons
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:
GeorgesGoons wrote:
Seeitsaveit13 wrote: Maybe people would actually believe in the chance for a 3rd party after all this

Not a chance. He doesn't have the (D) or (R) next to his name. Americans are too damn stupid and will only vote for someone with a (D) or (R) next to their name. Not saying Gary Johnson is the answer, but he sure as hell seems like the answer over Donald and definitely more than Hillary
I'm not saying he would win. But if he could at least get a decent chunk of votes, it could possibly give some momentum to the idea of a 3rd party vote not being a "wasted vote" as most people (like yourself, no offense) just toss it away.

"I'd give it a try, but it would just be a waste"

If all the people that said that, just gave it a try, it wouldn't be a waste anymore.
There needs to be a push to get everyone that would vote for Johnson but think it's a wasted vote to actually pull the lever for him. I'd assume he'd get more than Ross did in '92. I'm just curious where those votes come from (Trump or Clinton), Perot won the election for Clinton.