NDL Forum

ajalves wrote:

mbyrd75 wrote:if everybody was willing to start earlier. say 1999 then i could keep the feeder system i've already built for the old OGBL. I had set up NCAA and HS leagues and imported the first years class (seniors). Each year in the offseason i'd add the new freshman crop and we'd get to watch them grow. pretty cool concept but I guess I already committed to 2004

i honestly dont care wht year we start.

i guess my question is...if we start in 2000 (or whenever) and we get to the draft in 2003.....Im the braves, will i get whoever made the braves in 2003 added to my minors?

I am not a huge fan of that.

for the record, im just trying to understand

ajalves wrote:

mbyrd75 wrote:if everybody was willing to start earlier. say 1999 then i could keep the feeder system i've already built for the old OGBL. I had set up NCAA and HS leagues and imported the first years class (seniors). Each year in the offseason i'd add the new freshman crop and we'd get to watch them grow. pretty cool concept but I guess I already committed to 2004

i honestly dont care wht year we start.

i guess my question is...if we start in 2000 (or whenever) and we get to the draft in 2003.....Im the braves, will i get whoever made the braves in 2003 added to my minors?

I am not a huge fan of that.

for the record, im just trying to understand

ajalves wrote:

mbyrd75 wrote:if everybody was willing to start earlier. say 1999 then i could keep the feeder system i've already built for the old OGBL. I had set up NCAA and HS leagues and imported the first years class (seniors). Each year in the offseason i'd add the new freshman crop and we'd get to watch them grow. pretty cool concept but I guess I already committed to 2004

i honestly dont care wht year we start.

i guess my question is...if we start in 2000 (or whenever) and we get to the draft in 2003.....Im the braves, will i get whoever made the braves in 2003 added to my minors?

I am not a huge fan of that.

for the record, im just trying to understand

mbyrd75 wrote:

ajalves wrote:

mbyrd75 wrote:if everybody was willing to start earlier. say 1999 then i could keep the feeder system i've already built for the old OGBL. I had set up NCAA and HS leagues and imported the first years class (seniors). Each year in the offseason i'd add the new freshman crop and we'd get to watch them grow. pretty cool concept but I guess I already committed to 2004

i honestly dont care wht year we start.

i guess my question is...if we start in 2000 (or whenever) and we get to the draft in 2003.....Im the braves, will i get whoever made the braves in 2003 added to my minors?

I am not a huge fan of that.

for the record, im just trying to understand

No the draft would be just like any normal ootp draft but the players would be real life prospects. You wouldn't be tied to what the real life braves did beyond the team that you start with

ajalves wrote:

ajalves wrote:

mbyrd75 wrote:if everybody was willing to start earlier. say 1999 then i could keep the feeder system i've already built for the old OGBL. I had set up NCAA and HS leagues and imported the first years class (seniors). Each year in the offseason i'd add the new freshman crop and we'd get to watch them grow. pretty cool concept but I guess I already committed to 2004

i honestly dont care wht year we start.

i guess my question is...if we start in 2000 (or whenever) and we get to the draft in 2003.....Im the braves, will i get whoever made the braves in 2003 added to my minors?

I am not a huge fan of that.

for the record, im just trying to understand

additionally.....will these guys be sure things? for example...Pujols comes in in 2003 or 4 or whenever it was....is it a "given" he will perform (or at least have the potential to perform) the way he actually did, thus making him the #1 prospect?

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:

Knapp wrote:

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Meh, let's go with what we've got

Nobody asked the young buck....let the thirtysomethings mull it over!

You've posted in these 2 threads more than the entire other league cumulatively.

ajalves wrote:i have to admit those were good questions by me

shel311 wrote:

ajalves wrote:i have to admit those were good questions by me

Ehhh, I was thinking some of em were kinda obvious answers.

I graded them out as remedial type questions.

Knapp wrote:

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:

Knapp wrote:

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Meh, let's go with what we've got

Nobody asked the young buck....let the thirtysomethings mull it over!

You've posted in these 2 threads more than the entire other league cumulatively.

I'm on a roll & the wife is forcing me to watch House Hunters on HGTV, sorry.

shel311 wrote:

ajalves wrote:

mbyrd75 wrote:if everybody was willing to start earlier. say 1999 then i could keep the feeder system i've already built for the old OGBL. I had set up NCAA and HS leagues and imported the first years class (seniors). Each year in the offseason i'd add the new freshman crop and we'd get to watch them grow. pretty cool concept but I guess I already committed to 2004

i honestly dont care wht year we start.

i guess my question is...if we start in 2000 (or whenever) and we get to the draft in 2003.....Im the braves, will i get whoever made the braves in 2003 added to my minors?

I am not a huge fan of that.

for the record, im just trying to understand

No.

That year's draft class will come in, but we all draft on our own, so Pujols, for example, can be drafted by whoever, he wont be assigned to the Cards.