Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:29 am
To me, this is more shocking than any other rating.Utah 95 92 91 4
To me, this is more shocking than any other rating.Utah 95 92 91 4
Wow, makes me think the ratings are not correct. A 7-5 UTAH team with those ratings, no way....LetsGoPeay wrote:To me, this is more shocking than any other rating.Utah 95 92 91 4
Special teams.cougnix wrote:Mike Leach should have bumped WSU up to a 90 on offense...I don't know what EA looks at for ratings...BigRy wrote:EA really are a bunch of knuckleheads
Not that I really CARE about Cal but was planning on keeping them, now not so sure....
so last season CAL had an offense that ranked 41st and end up with a 89 grade
CAL had a defense that ranked 31st and end up with a 76 grade
I get that players leave but that does not make sense..
On a serious note. Explain this to me. Some teams that have overall ratings higher than both their Offense/Defensive ranks? So. Miss is an 83 overall and are 81/80 O/D. A 2 Prestige school then gets a 2 to 3 point bump in overall ratings?
Yeah that is way higher than I expected. Assuming they were open they were going to be one of the teams I considered. Probably not now if those ratings are correct.BigRy wrote:Wow, makes me think the ratings are not correct. A 7-5 UTAH team with those ratings, no way....LetsGoPeay wrote:To me, this is more shocking than any other rating.Utah 95 92 91 4
DRiccio21 wrote:Can't be right ... There are like 10 + teams ranked 96 or higher
Block M wrote:Let the demo be example, KSU is a 91 but is a B+ so you wont have 18 A+ teams.
So at 87 overall, Louisville might be a B team instead of a B+?ReignOnU wrote:Block M wrote:Let the demo be example, KSU is a 91 but is a B+ so you wont have 18 A+ teams.
That makes sense based on the spreadsheet that I made yesterday. I should have saved the file, but I could easily make it again. When I slotted it out, the letter grade variation wasn't too far off of last year. But the actual ratings were closer/higher.
razorback44 wrote:So at 87 overall, Louisville might be a B team instead of a B+?ReignOnU wrote:Block M wrote:Let the demo be example, KSU is a 91 but is a B+ so you wont have 18 A+ teams.
That makes sense based on the spreadsheet that I made yesterday. I should have saved the file, but I could easily make it again. When I slotted it out, the letter grade variation wasn't too far off of last year. But the actual ratings were closer/higher.
Since when is it ever 3rd down for youVTrunNgun wrote:I hope those ratings hold true...Because if they do, I may just plan on punting on 3rd downs so I can play more Defense
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWi-6qqh1EA[/youtube]jsence2 wrote:Is there anywhere that has the individual player ratings for teams yet?
Here are the rest:Block M wrote:jsence2 wrote:Is there anywhere that has the individual player ratings for teams yet?
0:56 mark - Wazzucougnix wrote:Is there no schools after T?