To me, this is more shocking than any other rating.Utah 95 92 91 4
NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
- LetsGoPeay
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15191
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:29 am
- Location: Hoosierland
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Wow, makes me think the ratings are not correct. A 7-5 UTAH team with those ratings, no way....LetsGoPeay wrote:To me, this is more shocking than any other rating.Utah 95 92 91 4
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Special teams.cougnix wrote:Mike Leach should have bumped WSU up to a 90 on offense...I don't know what EA looks at for ratings...BigRy wrote:EA really are a bunch of knuckleheads
Not that I really CARE about Cal but was planning on keeping them, now not so sure....
so last season CAL had an offense that ranked 41st and end up with a 89 grade
CAL had a defense that ranked 31st and end up with a 76 grade
I get that players leave but that does not make sense..
On a serious note. Explain this to me. Some teams that have overall ratings higher than both their Offense/Defensive ranks? So. Miss is an 83 overall and are 81/80 O/D. A 2 Prestige school then gets a 2 to 3 point bump in overall ratings?
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
I pulled the ratings, put them into Excel and then looked them over compared to 2011 & 2012. Normally, B+ teams are rated as high as 89, but I think for the number of teams in each bracket to hold steady and make sense, we're going to see B+ teams as high as 93. It'll be interesting to see what the grades are.
PSN: ReignOnU
- razorback44
- Reactions:
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:18 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Yeah that is way higher than I expected. Assuming they were open they were going to be one of the teams I considered. Probably not now if those ratings are correct.BigRy wrote:Wow, makes me think the ratings are not correct. A 7-5 UTAH team with those ratings, no way....LetsGoPeay wrote:To me, this is more shocking than any other rating.Utah 95 92 91 4
AIM: lazydayz446
PSN: lazydayz44

PSN: lazydayz44

-
- Site Admin
- Reactions:
- Posts: 11272
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:26 pm
- Location: NDL:O Headquarters: Columbus
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
DRiccio21 wrote:Can't be right ... There are like 10 + teams ranked 96 or higher
I have to agree.
- iRoccafella
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:25 pm
- Location: C-Springs, CO
- Contact:
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Needs more Teambuilder!
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Wisconsin also 99 yikes.
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Let the demo be example, KSU is a 91 but is a B+ so you wont have 18 A+ teams.
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Block M wrote:Let the demo be example, KSU is a 91 but is a B+ so you wont have 18 A+ teams.
That makes sense based on the spreadsheet that I made yesterday. I should have saved the file, but I could easily make it again. When I slotted it out, the letter grade variation wasn't too far off of last year. But the actual ratings were closer/higher.
PSN: ReignOnU
- razorback44
- Reactions:
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:18 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
So at 87 overall, Louisville might be a B team instead of a B+?ReignOnU wrote:Block M wrote:Let the demo be example, KSU is a 91 but is a B+ so you wont have 18 A+ teams.
That makes sense based on the spreadsheet that I made yesterday. I should have saved the file, but I could easily make it again. When I slotted it out, the letter grade variation wasn't too far off of last year. But the actual ratings were closer/higher.
AIM: lazydayz446
PSN: lazydayz44

PSN: lazydayz44

- VTrunNgun
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:18 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!





- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
razorback44 wrote:So at 87 overall, Louisville might be a B team instead of a B+?ReignOnU wrote:Block M wrote:Let the demo be example, KSU is a 91 but is a B+ so you wont have 18 A+ teams.
That makes sense based on the spreadsheet that I made yesterday. I should have saved the file, but I could easily make it again. When I slotted it out, the letter grade variation wasn't too far off of last year. But the actual ratings were closer/higher.
I'd have to make that sheet again, but yes, that's about what I'm thinking.
PSN: ReignOnU
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Since when is it ever 3rd down for youVTrunNgun wrote:I hope those ratings hold true...Because if they do, I may just plan on punting on 3rd downs so I can play more Defense



- autiger730
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3615
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
I've said it for years. Whoever is in charge of rating teams/player at EA should be punched in the face and fired. What a joke.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Is there anywhere that has the individual player ratings for teams yet?

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWi-6qqh1EA[/youtube]jsence2 wrote:Is there anywhere that has the individual player ratings for teams yet?
Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
Here are the rest:Block M wrote:jsence2 wrote:Is there anywhere that has the individual player ratings for teams yet?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTDwOotSkH8[/youtube]
Of course Utah State is left out even after they added more

Quack


Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!
0:56 mark - Wazzucougnix wrote:Is there no schools after T?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBU7ICWHTYY[/youtube]