Page 3 of 8

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:09 am
by Weasel
ajalves wrote:
Weasel wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:down goes Mich St.
Yup! Was up 17-13 and kicking a chip shot 30 yd FG, only to see it lag terribly during the kick and came up short. He drove down and scored, completely changed the game.
u suuuuck :P
Pretty sure I was the worst 7-0 team in league history

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:28 am
by texasfan4444
cdub21 wrote:nsfw? i was expecting better pics man
+2

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:40 am
by ajalves
Weasel wrote:
ajalves wrote:
Weasel wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:down goes Mich St.
Yup! Was up 17-13 and kicking a chip shot 30 yd FG, only to see it lag terribly during the kick and came up short. He drove down and scored, completely changed the game.
u suuuuck :P
Pretty sure I was the worst 7-0 team in league history
nah

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:49 pm
by DRiccio21
down goes another

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:52 pm
by ChampDizzle
DRiccio21 wrote:down goes another
:cry:

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:16 pm
by buckeye76
texasfan4444 wrote:
cdub21 wrote:nsfw? i was expecting better pics man
+2
This was all me, the other morning im on the internet at work (we are allowed but not allowed... :lol: )

I click the link, and I didnt hear the Fire Chief come into the room. He wasnt too happy....So I just threw up a NSFW just incase anyone has a big boss like mine. I did take a little bit of an ass chewing.... :lol:

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:06 pm
by bigred
ChampDizzle wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:down goes another
:cry:


SEC is just nasty

You should win the east and have a case for the title game if u beat bama or msu in a rematch

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:04 pm
by shel311
bigred wrote:You should win the east and have a case for the title game if u beat bama or msu in a rematch
Image

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:57 pm
by VTrunNgun
shel311 wrote:
bigred wrote:You should win the east and have a case for the title game if u beat bama or msu in a rematch
Image
I like UnderDog Shel a lot more than Mega-Boss Shel. He's definitely more humorous 8-)

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:19 pm
by shel311
It's funny cause i'm more confident when i'm losing. :lol:

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:05 pm
by VTrunNgun
shel311 wrote:It's funny cause i'm more confident when i'm losing. :lol:
Keep up the good work, but feel free to lose to Miami when you and Nasty decide to play.

I need him to help out my Strength of Schedule some more 8-)

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:48 pm
by DRiccio21
Down goes Oregon St.

leaves us with:

Va Tech 9-0
K St 6-0
L'ville 5-0
Stanford 7-0
Alabama 7-0

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:52 pm
by buckeye76
DRiccio21 wrote:Down goes Oregon St.

leaves us with:

Va Tech 9-0
K St 6-0
L'ville 5-0
Stanford 7-0
Alabama 7-0

Stimpin plays good with K.St but his last 5 games (well 4 cause he beat OU) are brutal.

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:01 pm
by DRiccio21
Bama -- 7-0

remaining games: @ Mizzou, vs Tenn, vs LSU, @ Miss St, @ Auburn, SEC Championship

likelihood of unbeaten: 35%

Virginia Tech -- 9-0

remaining games: @ Georgia Tech, vs UNC, @ Virginia, ACC Championship

likelihood of unbeaten: 90%

Stanford: 7-0

remaining games: @USC, @Oregon St, vs Oregon, vs Cal, vs ND, Pac12 Championship

likelihood of unbeaten: 35%

Louisville: 5-0

remaining games: @ Oregon, @ Cincy, vs Rutgers, @ WVU, vs Pitt, @ UConn, @ USF

likelihood of unbeaten: 15%

Kansas St: 6-0

remaining games: vs Toledo, @ Tex Tech, @ OK St, vs Tex A&M, @ Texas, vs Iowa St, Big 12 Championship

likelihood of unbeaten: 25%

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:05 pm
by RB4SC22
Bama only at 35%? I would atleast have them in the 60's

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:25 pm
by VTrunNgun
DRiccio21 wrote:
Kansas St: 6-0

remaining games: vs Toledo, @ Tex Tech, @ OK St, vs Tex A&M, @ Texas, vs Iowa St, Big 12 Championship

likelihood of unbeaten: 25%

Please excuse me if this is a dumb question, does the Big XII conference even have a conference championship game anymore!?

I count only 10 total teams in that conference with no North and South divider... :?

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:27 pm
by buckeye76
VTrunNgun wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:
Kansas St: 6-0

remaining games: vs Toledo, @ Tex Tech, @ OK St, vs Tex A&M, @ Texas, vs Iowa St, Big 12 Championship

likelihood of unbeaten: 25%

Please excuse me if this is a dumb question, does the Big XII conference even have a conference championship game anymore!?

I count only 10 total teams in that conference with no North and South divider... :?
It doesnt anymore

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:34 pm
by DRiccio21
ahhh, yeah, thats my bad

good catch

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:34 pm
by plasma1896
USC/STANFORD tried playing last night, but weather issues on dawgits end made it a no go. so we are looking at post irene to get that game played.

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:49 pm
by buckeye76
DRiccio21 wrote:ahhh, yeah, thats my bad

good catch

dont change too much for Stimpin (vs Toledo, @ Tex Tech, @ OK St, vs Tex A&M, @ Texas, vs Iowa St) thats still a tough 4 out of 6 games, and Relio at Tech has a good game then a bad one.