Re: Politics and stuff
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 8:37 pm
70% Jo Jorgensen
Watched a lot yesterday and today, didn't see anything from today regarding this. But yesterday she said she would not talk about possible cases she could see in front of her. She invoked the Ginsberg rule.nick wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:33 pm ‘Stunned’: Amy Coney Barrett refuses to say she would keep birth control and same-sex marriage legal
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... reddit.com
![]()
If you paid any attention at all, you'd know that she's refused to say far more than that. Fun to cherry pick a headline out of numerous house of commentary though.nick wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:33 pm ‘Stunned’: Amy Coney Barrett refuses to say she would keep birth control and same-sex marriage legal
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... reddit.com
![]()
Shh... that'll get you banned from the internet.GeorgesGoons wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 11:12 pm https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-rev ... an-to-dad/
Typical of the outspoken left or anti-republicans. I've probably watched over 8 hours (not including this mornings viewing) of the confirmation hearing and have yet to hear her say she was shutting down the ACA, Same Sex Marriage, blah blah blah. She has invoked the Ginsberg rule over and over again, but the left don't want to hear that, they want her to take a stance on hypothetical cases that may or may not get to her if she is confirmed. What kills me is most of these senators were at one time acting in some sort of judicial position during their careers. They would not have allowed a juror to sit and listen to testimony if they had a preconceived or hard stance on a case before it was presented to them, but will question her integrity since she will not have a public opinion on hypothetical cases.ReignOnU wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:07 amIf you paid any attention at all, you'd know that she's refused to say far more than that. Fun to cherry pick a headline out of numerous house of commentary though.nick wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:33 pm ‘Stunned’: Amy Coney Barrett refuses to say she would keep birth control and same-sex marriage legal
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... reddit.com
![]()
Damn, Hunter and Joe won't get paid thenCrowes wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 12:40 pm https://www.newsweek.com/trump-stimulus ... 1602773682
China is gonna pay for the next stimulus package now....![]()
![]()
![]()
GeorgesGoons wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:23 pmDamn, Hunter and Joe won't get paid thenCrowes wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2020 12:40 pm https://www.newsweek.com/trump-stimulus ... 1602773682
China is gonna pay for the next stimulus package now....![]()
![]()
![]()
I'll preface this by saying this still ain't gonna be a good look for Rudy, no arguments there.
shel311 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:15 pmI'll preface this by saying this still ain't gonna be a good look for Rudy, no arguments there.
But in reading up on it, the girl from the movie isn't underage, she's 23 or 24. Borat just ran into the hotel room screaming that she's only 15 for the bit.
Depends on if she said she was 15 before hand. Kind of like a sting operation online.
Hilarious that this guy is that fucking dumb regardless.
Like I said, this isn't exactly good news for Rudy, but that's probably an important distinction there.