NDL Forum

Because I'm of the opinion that you should vote based on your thoughts on each team.

Not different criteria based on how each person thinks it should be done.

jsence2 wrote:

sammy33 wrote:

jsence2 wrote:Congrats seeit!

I'm stoked about the season I've had....not because of anything it means for me this season, but more about what it does for me for future seasons....

I'm hoping so too. I had a nice challenge recommended to me for next season.

This will probably be my last winning season for a LOOOOOOONG time

And my comment about the voting was that if someone makes an argument for something when it is in their favor, then against it when it's not....then I'm going to hold them to the first argument. What is so wrong about that?

Whats wrong with it is you didnt even read what I wrote. just what 6 posted, I wasnt even talking about me though and the conversation with 6 was last season. I could care less if im in any bowl game to be honest look at my record overall. My root was for Cincy to be in Natl Championship game even though he lost the Big East if he beat WVU. Holding someone on a vote because of something someone said just makes me realize some dont put any thought into voting.

shel311 wrote:Because I'm of the opinion that you should vote based on your thoughts on each team.

Not different criteria based on how each person thinks it should be done.

It is....but if teams are jockeying for position and they're dead even, and this was an argument given by someone, then I would have them to be upset with me going against the argument they originally gave

Luckily it wasn't said so it doesn't matter; it also doesn't really matter because I'm already pretty set on my top 5 pending outcome of the final games.

doc wrote:

jsence2 wrote:

sammy33 wrote:

jsence2 wrote:Congrats seeit!

I'm stoked about the season I've had....not because of anything it means for me this season, but more about what it does for me for future seasons....

I'm hoping so too. I had a nice challenge recommended to me for next season.

This will probably be my last winning season for a LOOOOOOONG time

And my comment about the voting was that if someone makes an argument for something when it is in their favor, then against it when it's not....then I'm going to hold them to the first argument. What is so wrong about that?

Whats wrong with it is you didnt even read what I wrote. just what 6 posted, I wasnt even talking about me though and the conversation with 6 was last season. I could care less if im in any bowl game to be honest look at my record overall. My root was for Cincy to be in Natl Championship game even though he lost the Big East if he beat WVU. Holding someone on a vote because of something someone said just makes me realize some dont put any thought into voting.

whats funny is he has no problem tooting his own horn about a lackluster 11-1 season, but you literally went through a gauntlet of teams and finished 10-2, and hes saying words you didnt even say should hold votes against you.

Dudes a clown

Top 3 SOS
1. Colorado (2-10) .630
2. Auburn (7-5) .626
3. Pittsburgh (10-2) .621

Both Oregon and Mizzou at .500

doc should be playing for the title in my opinion

This thread had a nice, almost season long run.

It's about done now.

congrats to Champ for tasting Sugar with a win over Miss State

nick wrote:congrats to Champ for tasting Sugar with a win over Miss State

thanks if I figure out how to post highlights crazy crazy finish!

ChampDizzle wrote:Top 3 SOS
1. Colorado (2-10) .630
2. Auburn (7-5) .626
3. Pittsburgh (10-2) .621

Both Oregon and Mizzou at .500

doc should be playing for the title in my opinion

whoa whoa whoa

no offense but you're being ruhtarded

thats not SOS...thats the "combined record of opponents played"

totally different animal than sos

Oregon has the 12th rated "SOS", currently before even taking the conf championship game into consideration

Oregon?

they in this conversation still??

told everyone Oregon was winning it all

Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

Knappy83 wrote:Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

don't fuck up your ballot Knappy, we'll be watching

Knappy83 wrote:Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

nah its usually Bigmike vs Shel, but both of them oddly cant connect so its opened shit up.

nick wrote:

Knappy83 wrote:Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

nah its usually Bigmike vs Shel, but both of them oddly cant connect so its opened shit up.

At least I had an ok run, cause my best days are behind me it seems.

Knappy83 wrote:Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

Rookie

shel311 wrote:

nick wrote:

Knappy83 wrote:Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

nah its usually Bigmike vs Shel, but both of them oddly cant connect so its opened shit up.

At least I had an ok run, cause my best days are behind me it seems.

you got the moves like jagger

nick wrote:

shel311 wrote:

nick wrote:

Knappy83 wrote:Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

nah its usually Bigmike vs Shel, but both of them oddly cant connect so its opened shit up.

At least I had an ok run, cause my best days are behind me it seems.

you got the moves like jagger

I don't know what that means, but thanks?

shel311 wrote:

nick wrote:

shel311 wrote:

nick wrote:

Knappy83 wrote:Do things usually get this intense, every season, in determining who's playing in the big game? Just a video game, kids!

nah its usually Bigmike vs Shel, but both of them oddly cant connect so its opened shit up.

At least I had an ok run, cause my best days are behind me it seems.

you got the moves like jagger

I don't know what that means, but thanks?

its a song by maroon 5 and christina agulera

nick wrote:its a song by maroon 5 and christina agulera

So weird you mention Maroon 5.

I was watching SNL on the DVR(Yes I record SNL and I like it, deal with it LOL), the one with Charlie day hosting.

And Maroon 5 was the performer. I don't ever remember them being cool, but good Lord, I didn't remember the lead singer being sooooooooo gay(not that there's anything wrong with that) and...well acting exactly like a Mick Jagger would with all his little weird moves.

I wonder if he was singing that song and just acting like that, or if that's just his thing now.