NDL Forum

jsence2 wrote:Jacksonville signed two DE

My days as a Jaguar fan may be numbered. Pretty doubtful now they take Clowney, which means that they're going after a QB. If it's Bridgewater.....

LMAO, because he's from Louisville or because he isn't good in your opinion?

Jags traded Gabbert, they are taking a QB. Bank it...

jsence2 wrote:Jacksonville signed two DE

My days as a Jaguar fan may be numbered. Pretty doubtful now they take Clowney, which means that they're going after a QB. If it's Bridgewater.....

What's wrong with Bridgewater compared to the rest of the crap in the draft? (Referring to QB's)

I think Clowney will be a St Louis Ram will he not?

jsence2 wrote:Jacksonville signed two DE

My days as a Jaguar fan may be numbered. Pretty doubtful now they take Clowney, which means that they're going after a QB. If it's Bridgewater.....

Oh, and they are signing every Seahawk that they can, so they will be good again...lol

clowney was never making it to the Jags so thats a moot point, and everyone knew Gabbert was done when they resigned Henne. Jags dont have to take a QB, they could go Watkins or OL 1st round and take a chance on a 2nd round QB, or wait til next yr when Mariota and Winston come out

mariota

ajalves wrote:mariota

Mariota is gonna be a top 5 pick I dont understand why you're laughing..

cougnix wrote:

jsence2 wrote:Jacksonville signed two DE

My days as a Jaguar fan may be numbered. Pretty doubtful now they take Clowney, which means that they're going after a QB. If it's Bridgewater.....

LMAO, because he's from Louisville or because he isn't good in your opinion?

Jags traded Gabbert, they are taking a QB. Bank it...

They traded Gabbert because they signed Henne and because they wanted to get SOMETHING for him.

I've watched Jacksonville waste pick after pick after pick on people not worth being taken in the top 20 (Matt Jones, Byron Leftwich, Harvey, Williams, the list goes on). If they waste a third overall pick on a QB who can't throw an accurate pass more than 15 yards....I'm done with them. The coaches have changed, the owner has changed, the GM has changed. The whole regime is different. If the new one is going to be just as stupid as the old one, then screw it.

Henne isn't good, but he isn't bad. There are other areas the Jaguars need to improve, especially the OL/front seven. No QB is going to do well behind that line. And no team is going to struggle to beat us when we can't get pressure on the QB. You have Clowney, Mack, Robinson, and Matthews you could take with that third pick. You can get a solid QB later in the draft (guys like Murray for example) or you could trade down and get multiple picks. But wasting it on a QB who isn't worth being taken that high, it's just stupid.

nick wrote:everyone knew Gabbert was done when they resigned Henne. Jags dont have to take a QB, they could go Watkins or OL 1st round and take a chance on a 2nd round QB, or wait til next yr when Mariota and Winston come out

You're 100% right on this. Screenshot it, save it, whatever, I won't say that very often

Interesting to see where Big Vince will go.

Lol at Henne meaning they don't get a QB...

cougnix wrote:Lol at Henne meaning they don't get a QB...

Lol at you thinking them trading Gabbert meant they absolutely will get a QB...

test

ajalves wrote:

Saints trade Darren Sproles to Eagles

nice pick up for them

I'm good with it. He's still a valuable 3rd down back who can catch, but he has lost a lot of his quickness, and he really doesn't do much in the way of being shifty like he used to.

ajalves wrote: there is no real "security" in NFL contracts and they rarely are as valuable as they appear when announced. So i guess my point is, if you were an agent, why not have your clients do a series of 1 year guaranteed deals where you can probably get more money ?

Guaranteed money is what you want, especially in football where an injury could wreck you and you could lose out on tens of millions by taking on 1 year deals

1 month ago, Golden Tate said this:

"I probably shouldn't even say this right now, but I'm going to say it anyway just because I love Seattle," Tate said on Sports Radio 950 KJR in Seattle. "Honestly, I would rather take a little less to be happy and win ballgames than to take way more and go to a crappy city where the fans don't give a crap about the team, you win a game once a month -- something like that.

"I would much rather stay in the situation that I have now for a little less than to go and try to break the bank somewhere else."

Golden Tate has signed a contract with...Detroit.

shel311 wrote:1 month ago, Golden Tate said this:

"I probably shouldn't even say this right now, but I'm going to say it anyway just because I love Seattle," Tate said on Sports Radio 950 KJR in Seattle. "Honestly, I would rather take a little less to be happy and win ballgames than to take way more and go to a crappy city where the fans don't give a crap about the team, you win a game once a month -- something like that.

"I would much rather stay in the situation that I have now for a little less than to go and try to break the bank somewhere else."

Golden Tate has signed a contract with...Detroit.

Money talks. So does knowing you'll never see a double team ever again.

jsence2 wrote:

shel311 wrote:1 month ago, Golden Tate said this:

"I probably shouldn't even say this right now, but I'm going to say it anyway just because I love Seattle," Tate said on Sports Radio 950 KJR in Seattle. "Honestly, I would rather take a little less to be happy and win ballgames than to take way more and go to a crappy city where the fans don't give a crap about the team, you win a game once a month -- something like that.

"I would much rather stay in the situation that I have now for a little less than to go and try to break the bank somewhere else."

Golden Tate has signed a contract with...Detroit.

Money talks. So does knowing you'll never see a double team ever again.

That second one is actually pretty goddamn important, but, yeah, C.R.E.A.M.

Buncha Captain Obvious party poopers here!

nick wrote:

ajalves wrote:mariota

Mariota is gonna be a top 5 pick I dont understand why you're laughing..

you dont understand or dont agree?

drafting him in the top 5 would set a franchise back 5 years