NDL300 '13

kdog36 · Post by **kdog36** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:46 pm

Speaking of limpdick..........

OracleHCR · Post by **OracleHCR** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:07 pm

SIRLOIN wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:
jsence2 wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:Please give the guys who have only 1 user game some of the D1 opponents instead, seems fair cause otherwise it does give them a much better chance to reach the championship than those of us playing like 3 or more. Not picking on you guys, but why are you playing in an OD opposed to playing a Dynasty offline if you just here to recruit? I get recruiting is more fun against people, personally I think 2 user games is fair expectation of each of us. Just my 2 cents.

Because recruiting against the CPU isn't that fun, and because when you play offline the "top teams" always lose one weird game every season to make it easier for you to win the title. With this many good teams, the title game is gonna be a user game anyways.
Nothing you said is untrue, but my point remains. We are all going win 99.9% of the time we play a cpu controlled team, so when you only have 1 user game it is a heck of a an advantage on getting into the championship game, even with a weaker schedule.
user games suck! guy's don't play their f'n ndl games half the time? thank god the ndl went to 2 seasons. i can't wait until it's over. but good luck getting guy's to play their od games! i want as few user games as i can get. i dont care if i get into nc game . just tired of no shows and limpdick game play. beefy!

I knew how you felt about user games so the only one I scheduled you was against me week 4. I was the only one with a flexible enough schedule.

fsupenguin · Post by **fsupenguin** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:11 pm

I'm always happy to play Beefy, he knows he can find me.

I_S33M_THAB33T_U · Post by **I_S33M_THAB33T_U** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:50 pm

SIRLOIN wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:
jsence2 wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:Please give the guys who have only 1 user game some of the D1 opponents instead, seems fair cause otherwise it does give them a much better chance to reach the championship than those of us playing like 3 or more. Not picking on you guys, but why are you playing in an OD opposed to playing a Dynasty offline if you just here to recruit? I get recruiting is more fun against people, personally I think 2 user games is fair expectation of each of us. Just my 2 cents.

Because recruiting against the CPU isn't that fun, and because when you play offline the "top teams" always lose one weird game every season to make it easier for you to win the title. With this many good teams, the title game is gonna be a user game anyways.
Nothing you said is untrue, but my point remains. We are all going win 99.9% of the time we play a cpu controlled team, so when you only have 1 user game it is a heck of a an advantage on getting into the championship game, even with a weaker schedule.
user games suck! guy's don't play their f'n ndl games half the time? thank god the ndl went to 2 seasons. i can't wait until it's over. but good luck getting guy's to play their od games! i want as few user games as i can get. i dont care if i get into nc game . just tired of no shows and limpdick game play. beefy!

Agree with this 100%. I forgot Beefy was in here, Or i woulda played him, As we talk everyday so i know he wouldnt have been a issue to get the game played. But im sure me and whittness will end up playing in back to back weeks

ChampDizzle · Post by **ChampDizzle** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:03 am

OracleHCR wrote:Advanced to week 1. No user games. Georgia and Notre Dame are the only two teams with games. Next advance Sunday unless everybody finishes early.

I won't get mine in til probably Sunday morning due to work schedule.

I do agree should be more user games and after the holidays I will be able to play more user games.

Whittness10 · Post by **Whittness10** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:08 am

I_S33M_THAB33T_U wrote:But im sure me and whittness will end up playing in back to back weeks

I see this coming too. It should work out just the way the Big Ten wanted it to when they put the 2 in different divisions.

ChampDizzle · Post by **ChampDizzle** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:46 pm

played my game today 45-0 vs Penn St. Got 3 5-star recruits to commit

jsence2 · Post by **jsence2** » Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:45 pm

I got my first opening week instant commitment in a long time....by signing not one, but TWO kickers

Whittness10 · Post by **Whittness10** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:02 am

jsence2 wrote:I got my first opening week instant commitment in a long time....by signing not one, but TWO kickers

Now you have a Kicker controversy

fsupenguin · Post by **fsupenguin** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:03 am

I'll be home in a couple hours, does it look like we will advance in time today to maybe get my user game that is on next weeks slate?

OracleHCR · Post by **OracleHCR** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:14 am

fsupenguin wrote:I'll be home in a couple hours, does it look like we will advance in time today to maybe get my user game that is on next weeks slate?

Thab33t hasn't recruited yet and i did say I was advancing tonight so I'll advance when he is done.

WJ5811 · Post by **WJ5811** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:17 am

fsupenguin wrote:I'll be home in a couple hours, does it look like we will advance in time today to maybe get my user game that is on next weeks slate?

Ill be home at about 2pm cst and available the rest of the night.

I_S33M_THAB33T_U · Post by **I_S33M_THAB33T_U** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:46 pm

OracleHCR wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:I'll be home in a couple hours, does it look like we will advance in time today to maybe get my user game that is on next weeks slate?
Thab33t hasn't recruited yet and i did say I was advancing tonight so I'll advance when he is done.

Go ahead, Doesnt really matter. I get punished for having a user game, And prolly 2 user games.

So i really dont care about recruits.

Whole thing is stupid if you ask me.

OracleHCR · Post by **OracleHCR** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:16 pm

I_S33M_THAB33T_U wrote:
OracleHCR wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:I'll be home in a couple hours, does it look like we will advance in time today to maybe get my user game that is on next weeks slate?
Thab33t hasn't recruited yet and i did say I was advancing tonight so I'll advance when he is done.

Go ahead, Doesnt really matter. I get punished for having a user game, And prolly 2 user games.

So i really dont care about recruits.

Whole thing is stupid if you ask me.

I accommodated you as much as I could. If it isn't enough quit. I don't want to read about it every time I come into this thread.

I_S33M_THAB33T_U · Post by **I_S33M_THAB33T_U** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:26 pm

OracleHCR wrote:
I_S33M_THAB33T_U wrote:
OracleHCR wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:I'll be home in a couple hours, does it look like we will advance in time today to maybe get my user game that is on next weeks slate?
Thab33t hasn't recruited yet and i did say I was advancing tonight so I'll advance when he is done.

Go ahead, Doesnt really matter. I get punished for having a user game, And prolly 2 user games.

So i really dont care about recruits.

Whole thing is stupid if you ask me.
I accommodated you as much as I could. If it isn't enough quit. I don't want to read about it every time I come into this thread.

You didnt accomidate shit, You gave me 4 shitty ass games. Compared to anyone elses schedule I have the worst.

Im sure there was other teams outside of EMu, Texas St, and a FCS school i could have played. I have 1 user game (which was the requirement), And prolly 2 in back to back weeks. How come no one else has SHIT games like this ?? Cause you listened to Pengy and gave me shit for schedule cause you wanted to. Its BS.

Sorry, I dont wanna fuckin 4 or 5 user games where no one shows up and they get simmed. Doesnt mean I get a bunch of pussies on my schedule cause of it.

fsupenguin · Post by **fsupenguin** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:30 pm

OracleHCR · Post by **OracleHCR** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:31 pm

When I said I was going to give you a tough road game you complained. I give an easy schedule you complain. You need to make up your mind.

OracleHCR · Post by **OracleHCR** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:32 pm

The only thing I changed on your schedule was to take nd off. The other two games were already on there.

OracleHCR · Post by **OracleHCR** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:15 pm

Advanced to week 2. Georgia vs Clemson, FSU vs Washington and LSU vs TCU are the user games. No byes. Next advance Tuesday unless someone asks for more time or we finish early.

jsence2 · Post by **jsence2** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:54 pm

I_S33M_THAB33T_U wrote:
OracleHCR wrote:
I_S33M_THAB33T_U wrote:
OracleHCR wrote:
fsupenguin wrote:I'll be home in a couple hours, does it look like we will advance in time today to maybe get my user game that is on next weeks slate?
Thab33t hasn't recruited yet and i did say I was advancing tonight so I'll advance when he is done.

Go ahead, Doesnt really matter. I get punished for having a user game, And prolly 2 user games.

So i really dont care about recruits.

Whole thing is stupid if you ask me.
I accommodated you as much as I could. If it isn't enough quit. I don't want to read about it every time I come into this thread.

You didnt accomidate shit, You gave me 4 shitty ass games. Compared to anyone elses schedule I have the worst.

Im sure there was other teams outside of EMu, Texas St, and a FCS school i could have played. I have 1 user game (which was the requirement), And prolly 2 in back to back weeks. How come no one else has SHIT games like this ?? Cause you listened to Pengy and gave me shit for schedule cause you wanted to. Its BS.

Sorry, I dont wanna fuckin 4 or 5 user games where no one shows up and they get simmed. Doesnt mean I get a bunch of pussies on my schedule cause of it.

Just kick his whiny ass out and let's move on. Nobody in here wants to hear him cry all season.

NDL Forum

NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13

Re: NDL300 '13