nick wrote:quinn finished 2nd in sacks.. why would we want him at DT?shel311 wrote:Could Quinn possibly play DT?
Long/Clowney (rotate) - Brockers - Langford - Quinn
3rd down passing downs
Clowney - Long - Brockers - Quinn
dear..god..
Nah, Bradford will be back again only to get injured. So that average will be 6 to 7...ReignOnU wrote:nick wrote:quinn finished 2nd in sacks.. why would we want him at DT?shel311 wrote:Could Quinn possibly play DT?
Long/Clowney (rotate) - Brockers - Langford - Quinn
3rd down passing downs
Clowney - Long - Brockers - Quinn
dear..god..
.... and they go 2-14, losing with an average score of 3 to 7.
Cnasty wrote:Smart kid which is shocking considering where he went to college.
and you're basing this on...fsupenguin wrote:To be honest I would be uneasy with taking Clowney, I have serious doubts about if he has it in him to put in the work needed to be the player gms are hoping he will be.
His college coach questioned his work ethic.nick wrote:and you're basing this on...fsupenguin wrote:To be honest I would be uneasy with taking Clowney, I have serious doubts about if he has it in him to put in the work needed to be the player gms are hoping he will be.
He benched less than most combine participants. But damn he's fast...shel311 wrote:His college coach questioned his work ethic.nick wrote:and you're basing this on...fsupenguin wrote:To be honest I would be uneasy with taking Clowney, I have serious doubts about if he has it in him to put in the work needed to be the player gms are hoping he will be.
cougnix wrote:He benched less than most combine participants. But damn he's fast...shel311 wrote:His college coach questioned his work ethic.nick wrote:and you're basing this on...fsupenguin wrote:To be honest I would be uneasy with taking Clowney, I have serious doubts about if he has it in him to put in the work needed to be the player gms are hoping he will be.
How can you say bench means nothing? He is a DE! Creating separation from the offensive player is necessity. Oline guys are getting fast too and just speed isn't going to get it done these days.nick wrote:if Clowney wasnt interested he would of skipped the combine and just did a work day. Instead he destroyed the 40. His bench press was down. You know what bench pressing means? absolutely nothing. Who gives a shit what Spurrier thinks/says. Clowney was touted as the #1 pick last yr. He just didnt care. I wouldnt care either if I knew I was a lock for a top pick. I'd coast the final year, make sure I dont get injured ala Lattimore, and get drafted high.
All that bench shows is that he only performed well in the things that he gave a shit about. You're right, bench isn't a HUGE issue one way or the other, but the fact that he didn't give a shit is. If he's picking and choosing what he gives a shit about now, will he do it later? That's what people are worried about.nick wrote:Im saying bench press means absolutely nothing. NFL.com graded Clowney a 7.5, closest is 7.1 (Watkins) then like 6.7. This is after the bench press. That goes to show you how little bench means to scouts. This is all just a spectacle for the fans at this point. When do players run 40 yards? when do they run it without equipment? do these tests take into account fatigue in the 4th q? seldom, no, no. How many DTs run 40 yards in a game let alone a play? its just another thing to break 2 players down if theyre similar. Clowney is generational.
theyre just basic basic tests. The important things at the combine the public cant see like the interviews.
the moment i saw these i thought "maryland under armour knock offs". the red/yellow shit on the legs is essentially the sameajalves wrote:look as ugly/similar to Marylands
Definitely the worst part as those numbers are atrocious. 2nd is the entire helmet size logo on the side.Seeitsaveit13 wrote:If the number font wasn't so stank it might not be that bad
