Page 2 of 2
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:53 pm
by oldschoola
6ftdeep wrote:BADGERBACKER wrote:Head on a swivel - looked like a clean block to me. It was not below the waist. Brett's helmet and shoulder hit him in the midsection and the definition per the NFL is "4. Crackback: Eligible receivers who take or move to a position more than two yards outside the tackle may not block an opponent below the waist if they then move back inside to block."
Good to see the same group crying and complaining though. Nothing changes which is nice to know.
You obviously did not watch that close enough, his initial impact on Wilson was definately at the knees, slow the video down and freeze it at impact, his inside shoulder his hitting eugene at the knee, you can see it also in the way his leg buckles had the impact been at the waist Wilson would have bounced sort of sideways from the momentum of the block.. NOt his legs completely going out from underneth him.. It was a crapping block, and not clean.
yeah i didnt watch it close enough either
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:56 pm
by steelcitychaos
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:cunt
My buddies and I have another way of saying this word so Women/Men don't understand what we are saying.
C=C
U=You
N=Next
T=Tuesdays
or just call them Tuesdays for short. If Favre was a women I think he would fit as a Tuesday.
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:59 pm
by texasfan4444
steelcitychaos wrote:Seeitsaveit13 wrote:cunt
My buddies and I have another way of saying this word so Women/Men don't understand what we are saying.
C=C
U=You
N=Next
T=Tuesdays
or just call them Tuesdays for short. If Favre was a women I think he would fit as a Tuesday.
UWPHT - pronounced "upt"
means
U = You
W= Would
P= Pound
H= His
T= Tuesday
or just gay for short.
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:39 pm
by trendon
While I agree that, according to the rules, this was an illegal block, I just want to reiterate that I hate every football rule change over the past ten years.
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:36 pm
by BADGERBACKER
Fuck slowing it down and initial impact - look at the damn rule. I guess I am looking at a wrong angle as I only have the back where it clearly show above the waist contact. Just fucking face it - Farve's a bad mother fucker taking bitches out - reap it Texan fans you bleeding once a month bitches.
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:49 pm
by Matt90210
trendon wrote:While I agree that, according to the rules, this was an illegal block, I just want to reiterate that I hate every football rule change over the past ten years.
Yeah, the game has been pussified, which most of the NDL enjoys.
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:52 pm
by ajalves
you guys are fucking ridiculous......he dropped to take the guys knees out on a crack back block....farve is the one being a "pussy" ....block like a fucking man
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:06 pm
by TEEwade
ajalves wrote:you guys are fucking ridiculous......he dropped to take the guys knees out on a crack back block....farve is the one being a "pussy" ....block like a fucking man
It was bush league like you originally said AJ.
I'm a Vikings fan and even I can tell you it was dirty and that I cannot stand Brett Favre. Really can't believe the organization payed this clown 25 million dollars for 2 years.
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:01 am
by VeniVediV1ci
Judy's nonsensical posts are back.
Great.
Re: Brett Favre's block
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:04 am
by shel311
VeniVediV1ci wrote:Judy's nonsensical posts are back.
Great.
/cue a response from Judy involving a 14 year old girl.