Page 2 of 2

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 9:51 am
by Wasted Memory
What are you calling major? I think everyone loses at least one guy during the season for a couple months.

I'm Team duster here, if I read that correctly. I would probably be okay with upping the major injuries but only if these minor injuries absurd lengths were put in check.

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 9:52 am
by Seeitsaveit13
The_Niddler wrote:I think the injuries are down because there are only a handful of teams that have a trainer rated lower than excellent:
(Everyone else's is Excellent or higher)

Albany - Good
Indianapolis - Good
Las Vegas - Good
Montreal - Good
Sheltown - Good
Steel City - Decent
Are injuries down? Do we have proof of this? I know someone did the research a while back, but not sure how recently.

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 9:59 am
by LetsGoPeay
They should be down. It's 2048. I'm sure most injuries have been genetically engineered out of humans by this point.

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 10:32 am
by ajalves
Uuaww wrote:
ajalves wrote:this topic caught me off guard. Explain why you'd want to raise their frequency
teams can go entire seasons without a major injury... it is pretty common. That doesn't appear to be normal. I hear things that mlb teams start AAA middle relievers in a pinch due to their staffs being injured. That never happens with us.

But not what people want, it is fine, seems most would rather have even less or no injuries. :oops:
ties into your players (iron man, wrecked, etc) and your trainer.

Similar to teams who get money ties into your owner.. . . . ... .. :lol:

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 3:17 pm
by Boston_Rob
This is dumb. Thought you were better than this Ted. Let's not tinker if we don't have too.

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 4:04 pm
by DRiccio21
Boston_Rob wrote: Let's nottinker if we don't have too.
the term is TWEAK!

Re: 2048 Winter Meetings Topic #1

Posted: Sat May 27, 2017 9:04 am
by Boston_Rob
DRiccio21 wrote:
Boston_Rob wrote: Let's nottinker if we don't have too.
the term is TWEAK!
I thought tinker was the plural present or Tweak