NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Find the latest Playstation news and information here.
nick
Reactions:
Posts: 44851
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:40 pm

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by nick »

sad part is michigan will still suck ass cause their QB is for online dynasties and not the ndl lol. so Michigan is really a 95 overall with that horribly accurate QB
User avatar
trendon
Reactions:
Posts: 22376
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:03 pm
Location: Mamaroneck, New York

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by trendon »

Buffalo is not that bad and where is South Alabama?
Image
User avatar
jsence2
Reactions:
Posts: 18758
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by jsence2 »

We got an 83....and my win goal is going to be 1 or 0 based on my 8 default games :(
Image

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
User avatar
razorback44
Reactions:
Posts: 884
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by razorback44 »

trendon wrote:Buffalo is not that bad and where is South Alabama?
Screw up on EA's part. They don't put probationary members in the game. They were told that UTSA, Texas State and UMass were full members and USA was a probationary member. In reality all 4 are probationary members. When they figured it out it was to late to add or remove teams so USA got left out.

That is their story at least.
AIM: lazydayz446
PSN: lazydayz44

Image
BIGmike
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 8215
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by BIGmike »

USC 99... :)
User avatar
trendon
Reactions:
Posts: 22376
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:03 pm
Location: Mamaroneck, New York

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by trendon »

razorback44 wrote:
trendon wrote:Buffalo is not that bad and where is South Alabama?
Screw up on EA's part. They don't put probationary members in the game. They were told that UTSA, Texas State and UMass were full members and USA was a probationary member. In reality all 4 are probationary members. When they figured it out it was to late to add or remove teams so USA got left out.

That is their story at least.
That is laughable.
Image
User avatar
I_S33M_THAB33T_U
Reactions:
Posts: 4848
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by I_S33M_THAB33T_U »

trendon wrote:Buffalo is not that bad and where is South Alabama?

South bama not till 14
User avatar
jsence2
Reactions:
Posts: 18758
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by jsence2 »

Wow.....Washington is a 93. At this point I'm smh at some of these ratings.

Plus if all these ratings hold true, you're gonna see about 2/3 of the league not come close to their win goals. You're looking at like 25 A or better teams. That's absurd.
Image

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
nick
Reactions:
Posts: 44851
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:40 pm

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by nick »

ncaa is slowly making the transition to arcade football lol
User avatar
LetsGoPeay
Reactions:
Posts: 15191
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by LetsGoPeay »

For those of you that don't want to follow that link anymore:

Team Overall Offense Defense Prestige
Air Force 75 75 74 3
Akron 63 67 61 1
Alabama 97 92 95 6
Arizona 83 81 84 3
Az St. 85 84 80 3
Arkansas 95 95 87 5
Ark St 81 86 74 2
Army 73 75 71 1
Auburn 93 89 91 6
BYU 89 89 84 4
Ball State 73 77 71 2
Baylor 87 88 84 3
Boise St. 89 89 82 6
BC 85 83 86 3
BG 75 75 76 2
Buffalo 71 75 69 1
Cal 85 89 76 3
CMU 73 77 69 2
Cincinnati 89 84 87 3
Clemson 97 95 91 5
Colarado 83 80 82 2
CSU 83 81 80 2
UConn 83 83 80 3
Duke 83 84 78 2
ECU 83 80 82 2
EMU 77 78 73 1
FIU 85 83 82 1
Florida 91 84 93 6
FAU 60 60 63 1
FSU 97 92 95 5
Fresno St. 87 89 78 2
Georgia 97 95 91 5
GT 87 86 84 4
Hawaii 79 78 80 2
Houston 87 84 86 3
Idaho 65 64 67 1
Illinois 83 81 82 3
Indiana 77 77 76 2
Iowa 91 89 89 4
Iowa St. 83 81 82 2
Kansas 79 80 76 2
Kansas St. 91 92 86 3
Kent St. 71 69 74 1
Kentucky 83 83 80 2
LSU 99 92 95 6
La Tech 81 81 78 1
Louisville 87 84 86 3
Marshall 73 75 71 2
Maryland 85 80 87 3
Memphis 61 66 60 1
Miami(FL) 91 88 89 6
Miami U 79 80 74 2
Michigan 97 94 91 6
MSU 93 89 89 4
MTSU 65 70 61 1
Minnesota 77 75 76 2
Miss St. 87 84 86 3
Missouri 89 89 84 4
NC St. 91 89 87 3
Navy 77 77 76 3
Nebraska 91 91 87 5
Nevada 83 83 80 3
UNM 65 64 69 1
NM St. 65 70 60 1
UNC 91 89 87 4
UNT 69 70 69 1
NIU 79 78 76 2
NW 87 86 84 3
ND 97 94 95 6
Ohio 81 81 80 2
Ohio St. 95 89 95 6
Oklahoma 97 95 93 6
Ok St. 95 92 91 5
Ole Miss 83 81 84 2
Oregon 99 94 95 6
Oregon St. 79 81 76 2
Penn St. 89 86 89 5
Pitt 85 89 76 3
Purdue 87 84 84 3
Rice 73 75 73 2
Rutgers 87 83 87 3
SMU 89 89 84 3
SDSU 83 84 76 3
San Jose 73 75 73 1
S. Car 95 92 91 4
So Miss 83 81 80 2
Stanford 93 91 89 5
Syracuse 81 83 78 3
TCU 93 94 87 5
Temple 81 83 84 2
Tennessee 89 88 84 4
Texas 99 91 99 6
Texas Am 93 92 87 4
Texas St. 65 67 65 1
TT 87 89 82 3
Toledo 83 81 80 2
Troy 73 74 73 2
Tulane 65 69 63 1
Tulsa 91 89 86 2
UAB 65 69 65 1
UCF 85 84 82 3
UCLA 87 88 82 2
ULL 77 81 71 1
ULM 69 74 65 1
UMass 63 67 61 1
UNLV 63 67 61 2
USC 99 99 91 6
USF 81 80 80 3
UTEP 75 74 76 2
UTSA 63 66 63 1
Utah 95 92 91 4
Utah St. 75 78 73 1
Vanderbilt 77 80 74 2
Virginia 89 88 84 3
VT 95 88 99 5
Wake 81 84 76 2
Wash 93 92 86 4
Wazzu 79 83 74 1
WVU 87 91 76 4
WKU 73 74 73 1
WMU 77 78 74 1
Wisconsin 99 97 95 5
Wyoming 79 78 80 2
Image
User avatar
LetsGoPeay
Reactions:
Posts: 15191
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by LetsGoPeay »

Can IU get a two season demotion to the MAC? The ratings, and real life performance, more than justify it.
Image
User avatar
DRiccio21
Reactions:
Posts: 29184
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:38 am
Location: Miami, FL

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by DRiccio21 »

LetsGoPeay wrote:Can IU get a two season demotion to the MAC? The ratings, and real life performance, more than justify it.
just a quick glance, but is IU the lowest rated BCS team?
Image
User avatar
LetsGoPeay
Reactions:
Posts: 15191
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by LetsGoPeay »

DRiccio21 wrote:
LetsGoPeay wrote:Can IU get a two season demotion to the MAC? The ratings, and real life performance, more than justify it.
just a quick glance, but is IU the lowest rated BCS team?
I didn't take the time to figure that out but they're rated the same or slightly better than all the MAC teams, as they should be after last season.
Image
User avatar
Ry
Reactions:
Posts: 5523
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:46 pm
Location: Broncos Country, CO

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by Ry »

EA really are a bunch of knuckleheads

Not that I really CARE about Cal but was planning on keeping them, now not so sure....

so last season CAL had an offense that ranked 41st and end up with a 89 grade

CAL had a defense that ranked 31st and end up with a 76 grade

I get that players leave but that does not make sense..
User avatar
shel311
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 72606
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: Sheltown Shockers

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by shel311 »

LetsGoPeay wrote:LSU 99 92 95
OH YEA!!!
User avatar
DRiccio21
Reactions:
Posts: 29184
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:38 am
Location: Miami, FL

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by DRiccio21 »

shel311 wrote:
LetsGoPeay wrote:LSU 99 92 95
OH YEA!!!
99 overall is good for like the 8th rated team in the game.
Image
User avatar
shel311
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 72606
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: Sheltown Shockers

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by shel311 »

DRiccio21 wrote:99 overall is good for like the 8th rated team in the game.
They given out 100s nowadays?
User avatar
cougnix
Reactions:
Posts: 9086
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:31 pm
Location: Fife, WA
Contact:

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by cougnix »

BigRy wrote:EA really are a bunch of knuckleheads

Not that I really CARE about Cal but was planning on keeping them, now not so sure....

so last season CAL had an offense that ranked 41st and end up with a 89 grade

CAL had a defense that ranked 31st and end up with a 76 grade

I get that players leave but that does not make sense..
Mike Leach should have bumped WSU up to a 90 on offense...I don't know what EA looks at for ratings...:)

On a serious note. Explain this to me. Some teams that have overall ratings higher than both their Offense/Defensive ranks? So. Miss is an 83 overall and are 81/80 O/D. A 2 Prestige school then gets a 2 to 3 point bump in overall ratings?
ImageImage

PSN: Cougnix
User avatar
razorback44
Reactions:
Posts: 884
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by razorback44 »

I'm really surprised that Louisville isn't the top team in the Big East. Most preseason rankings have them as the only BE team in the top 25. Good news for me I guess if I decide to keep them but still surprising.
AIM: lazydayz446
PSN: lazydayz44

Image
tball275
Reactions:
Posts: 2426
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:59 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: NCAA 13 Team Ratings!

Post by tball275 »

UTSA is a 63 overall in its first year. Who is picking Texas State? :twisted: The I-35 Rivalry Series is waiting...
Post Reply

Return to “Playstation”