Page 95 of 138

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 1:42 am
by jsence2
nick wrote:this all started because i told you that losing 1 player in a 9 man lineup isnt a big deal. 11% of the lineup apparently runs your high octane super bb/hit team.

Then I suggest Diaz to replace someone whos doing shit like say Kendall. you go, "wahh sample size".. thats arguably the stupidest thing you said. DUH!! you wont know if someone can sustain it unless they keep playing!!

Vs righties

Bill Phillips - IF - 85 AB - 271/354/365
Kendall - IF - 237 - 194/233/333

Phillips sample size might be "low" but an educated coach would see that someone with 237 abs vs righties with a OBP if .233!!! would consider a change. why not give the guy with 87 abs (1/3) and the .354 a shot? Like seriously? this is common sense 101.

Diaz - OF - 58 AB - 310/403/431
Oglethorpe - OF - 221 - 240/298/430

once again, small sample size but the guy is a monster thus far. Oglethorpe has shown dick and 403/1000 >> 298/1000.

I dont care what you do with your team, just dont insult my intelligence then make those snarky comments about how i know so much. I know how to adjust apparently you dont.

As for your stupid hypothetical, I dont care cause you never showed me ABs. It could be 10 abs to 300 cause youre so dramatic like that.

1) Diaz has no speed at all and is a 1B, not an OF. If you think he should start in the OF (or over Oglethorpe) then you're absolutely insane
2) Kendall is a highly rated player who is slumping and I need to see if he can turn it around before I give him a big money deal. Is that ok with you, or should I be looking for more from my #7/#8 hitter? You think I should give "a shot" to a guy who has been on my roster multiple seasons and is 33, and bench the 26 year old who is one of my more popular players. Right.
3) Diaz can play 1B and DH. He replaces either Gomez or Paco (lmao). You choose.

Btw.....
nick wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol: you picked for me man!! plus your question is so dumb. you ask me who id pick. duh #2 had better stats. I dont care that #1 had 6x as many abs you asked who i would rather have :lol: ..if that was my team #2 would have more than 66 abs and the 1st batter wouldnt have around 400 like a smart coach would do :lol:

I'm so glad you think that way. Because hitter #1 is Diaz. Hitter #2 is Gomez ;). Hitter #1 has 66 ABs this year.

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 1:48 am
by nick
jsence2 wrote:
1) Diaz has no speed at all and is a 1B, not an OF. If you think he should start in the OF (or over Oglethorpe) then you're absolutely insane
2) Kendall is a highly rated player who is slumping and I need to see if he can turn it around before I give him a big money deal. Is that ok with you, or should I be looking for more from my #7/#8 hitter? You think I should give "a shot" to a guy who has been on my roster multiple seasons and is 33, and bench the 26 year old who is one of my more popular players. Right.
3) Diaz can play 1B and DH. He replaces either Gomez or Paco (lmao). You choose.

Btw.....
I'm so glad you think that way. Because hitter #1 is Diaz. Hitter #2 is Gomez ;). Hitter #1 has 66 ABs this year.
Im gonna reply to this, and thats it i promise. i feel bad for everyone else they dont wanna read this shit, hell im tired of writing it. you just have so many excuses for why your team sucks.

1. Barron is DH, Oglethorpe is RF. move Barron to OF and Diaz to DH, solves that
2. Kendall is slumping is apparently a consistent thing. hes had OPS+ of 94, 110, 97 and 65 the last 4 seasons. so 1 year he was above average. and you gave him a big deal?? :lol: :lol:
3. Diaz goes to DH and Barron goes to OF replacing Oglethorpe i already explained this to you :lol:

as for your 2nd part, I made a mistake cause i didnt even read it. I would probably take #1. why? .403 OBP. OBP >> and i go for recent success. .403 > .336 by a long shot :lol: .. I just assumed when you said the AB shit it was some trick.

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 1:48 am
by kdog36
Holt

Parks...


They will solve all your problems.

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 1:55 am
by jsence2
nick wrote:ill block u after im gonna use this post to answer your Q

lmao don't bother, not gonna read it. Trust me, the only reason you aren't blocked is that you still have a green name. But I'm hoping that will be fixed soon.

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:01 am
by shel311
nick wrote:i just looked at the original history. appears we only have 4 members from the beginning who never left.

Image

Trendon, AJ, Bernie and I.
Who never left what?

Me, Baker?

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:01 am
by nick
shel311 wrote:
nick wrote:i just looked at the original history. appears we only have 4 members from the beginning who never left.

Image

Trendon, AJ, Bernie and I.
Who never left what?

Me, Baker?
thats what i dont get. why is the 1st yr only 8 teams?

:lol: :lol: :lol: oh fuck that was just the AL !! :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:05 am
by shel311
:lol:

That's cool though, i don't know how you are able to find that old info, good stuff.

I had 2 games for a World Series title in 2010 then never came close again. Woe is me.

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:06 am
by nick
*cough* i fucked up. the yellow are the ones whove been with us since the beginning

Image
Image

9 of us. Solid group of guys too. Then we had to let Jason in :lol:

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:06 am
by jsence2
kdog36 wrote:Holt

Parks...


They will solve all your problems.

Holt would just give me a logjam :lol:

Parks is damn nice tho

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:06 am
by nick
shel311 wrote::lol:

That's cool though, i don't know how you are able to find that old info, good stuff.

I had 2 games for a World Series title in 2010 then never came close again. Woe is me.
click NDL button, mid row you'll see "History" click Index and prepare for nostalgia

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:32 am
by nick
Top 25 batters obp/slug. Arod is a god. Benny Hamilton is a machine. cant believe i traded him :(

Image

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:46 am
by jsence2
nick wrote:
jsence2 wrote:
1) Diaz has no speed at all and is a 1B, not an OF. If you think he should start in the OF (or over Oglethorpe) then you're absolutely insane
2) Kendall is a highly rated player who is slumping and I need to see if he can turn it around before I give him a big money deal. Is that ok with you, or should I be looking for more from my #7/#8 hitter? You think I should give "a shot" to a guy who has been on my roster multiple seasons and is 33, and bench the 26 year old who is one of my more popular players. Right.
3) Diaz can play 1B and DH. He replaces either Gomez or Paco (lmao). You choose.

Btw.....
I'm so glad you think that way. Because hitter #1 is Diaz. Hitter #2 is Gomez ;). Hitter #1 has 66 ABs this year.
Im gonna reply to this, and thats it i promise. i feel bad for everyone else they dont wanna read this shit, hell im tired of writing it. you just have so many excuses for why your team sucks.

1. Barron is DH, Oglethorpe is RF. move Barron to OF and Diaz to DH, solves that
2. Kendall is slumping is apparently a consistent thing. hes had OPS+ of 94, 110, 97 and 65 the last 4 seasons. so 1 year he was above average. and you gave him a big deal?? :lol: :lol:
3. Diaz goes to DH and Barron goes to OF replacing Oglethorpe i already explained this to you :lol:

as for your 2nd part, I made a mistake cause i didnt even read it. I would probably take #1. why? .403 OBP. OBP >> and i go for recent success. .403 > .336 by a long shot :lol: .. I just assumed when you said the AB shit it was some trick.

1) Paco's not a good fielder. My defense isn't the greatest so I'd rather not make it worse by benching a better defender (who is also making 15m btw)
2) I didn't give Kendall a big deal, he's on arbitration. I said I'm trying to see if he comes out of it BEFORE I sign him to a deal.
3) Not going to risk Paco getting hurt (or sacrifice more defense) by putting Diaz at DH. Again, it's not just about hitting.

And did you ever think that maybe I'm shopping Diaz around to get something I need more than him? ;)

Have a good night....and I won't lie, the charts are cool; good work.

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:50 am
by nick
bottom left is best. no surprise. i wish the middle part of the site was bigger so bigger images would work

Image

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 3:09 am
by trendon
ReignOnU wrote:
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:
ReignOnU wrote:
Career Over! Major Injury Strikes Reynolds
who was this?
Reynolds.
HAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 3:10 am
by trendon
Jesus, 1.5 back?

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 3:12 am
by nick
runs scored vs runs allowed. AL is blue, NL is red.

Image

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:52 am
by I_S33M_THAB33T_U
nick wrote: Benny Hamilton is a machine. cant believe i traded him :(

Im sure Javier Martinez/Jim Gill/Clint Zimmerman are going to be better then what I got in the deal.

Hamilton = Beast
Shoemaker = Hasnt done a damn thing
Manning = Did great last year, Now shitting the bed.

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 7:07 am
by kdog36
nick wrote:*cough* i fucked up. the yellow are the ones whove been with us since the beginning

Image
Image

9 of us. Solid group of guys too. Then we had to let Jason in :lol:

Damn that had to be when we began. I actually had a winning record. lmao :oops:

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 7:11 am
by kdog36
and how are you doing thos graphs.?

I literally have spent about 4 of my 12 hours here at work trying to figure that out and find it but good god I cant for the life of me figure it out.

go figure lol

Re: 2027 - Season - Here We Go Again! (Ready 2/14)

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:44 am
by Whittness10
Loving all the graphs this morning. And who was Denver in the beginning?