NDL Forum

two major votes for the offseason. reallignment to 2 division leagues and raise injuries.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PLAYOFFS

But you can't say that it is not an issue on 19 if we go back to normal. It may be the exact same thing which is why guys wanted to go to low and by going to low we made them lower which was the point.

Saying we may as well turn them off makes no sense

Sheltown is 22 games better than Miami.

15-4 vs Miami this season.

Outscored Miami 29-6 in our last 3 games played.




I don't like it!!!

wdoupis wrote:Saying we may as well turn them off makes no sense

It makes slightly less sense than the current setup.


I had 2 injuries all season, 1 for 7 days and another for 28, and you think that's the perfect pace?

That's amazing to me that you'd think that.

Uuaww wrote:two major votes for the offseason. reallignment to 2 division leagues and raise injuries.

I will post a realignment thing tomorrow since there is no sim tomorrow. Won't be specific to just the 2 division idea, we will see if guys want it first. I actually think realignment would be great and Ted's 2 division per league idea is awesome. Good for competitive balance.

shel311 wrote:Sheltown is 22 games better than Miami.

15-4 vs Miami this season.

Outscored Miami 29-6 in our last 3 games played.




I don't like it!!!

the plan is to talk with the Chinese because theyve invented weather control by then. Gonna try and get 3rd inning rain delays to get to your 15th ranked bullpen sooner

we should have 32 divisions and everyone makes the playoffs

also dont forget my NDLB Cup Winter League idea.

shel311 wrote:

wdoupis wrote:Saying we may as well turn them off makes no sense

It makes slightly less sense than the current setup.


I had 2 injuries all season, 1 for 7 days and another for 28, and you think that's the perfect pace?

That's amazing to me that you'd think that.

But you are one team of 30 and this is one season. Next year you may lose 5 guys. The point is injuries still matter quite a bit and destroy some teams every season.

To me there is nothing fun about having a bunch of studs get destroyed every season and go to fragile and be worthless. It does not matter to me what happens in real life. Injuries matter, you still need to build depth and I think where we are is fine and much better than how it was before we went to low

wdoupis wrote:But you are one team of 30 and this is one season

So did a few other teams.

And the team that lost the most players hardly lost any players as well.

wdoupis wrote:The point is injuries still matter quite a bit

Not really

wdoupis wrote:you still need to build depth

Not really

wdoupis wrote:

shel311 wrote:

wdoupis wrote:Saying we may as well turn them off makes no sense

It makes slightly less sense than the current setup.


I had 2 injuries all season, 1 for 7 days and another for 28, and you think that's the perfect pace?

That's amazing to me that you'd think that.

But you are one team of 30 and this is one season. Next year you may lose 5 guys. The point is injuries still matter quite a bit and destroy some teams every season.

To me there is nothing fun about having a bunch of studs get destroyed every season and go to fragile and be worthless. It does not matter to me what happens in real life. Injuries matter, you still need to build depth and I think where we are is fine and much better than how it was before we went to low

Agree.

I think we lost true realism a while back. At this point, lets make it as enjoyable for as many people as possible.

Hell, our divisions aren't realistic, but people enjoy them, so we do it. They're about to (possibly) get more unrealistic, but if 25/30 owners like it, then why not? We're 50 years into the future at this point.

If it's fair, competitive, and balanced, it's fine.

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:I think we lost true realism a while back. At this point, lets make it as enjoyable for as many people as possible.

So if less injuries equals more fun, why does it "make no sense" for me to say them them off? That's more of a question for Billy, fwiw.

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:If it's fair, competitive, and balanced, it's fine.

So are no injuries. So are injuries set to normal. All of those are fair and balanced too.

Feeling the least confident heading into the postseason then we have with any of our other 120 win teams.

That being said, if we lose it was a random playoff fluke and we are the best team in the AL by far and will just chalk it up to OOTP randomness, right nick???

nick wrote:
also dont forget my NDLB Cup Winter League idea.

Agree, but the new guys wouldn't appreciate the cup like us old NCAA fottball guys would....I may be wrong

shel311 wrote:
So are no injuries. So are injuries set to normal. All of those are fair and balanced too.

So why bother changing if all 3 scenarios are even and more people want less injuries?

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:

shel311 wrote:
So are no injuries. So are injuries set to normal. All of those are fair and balanced too.

So why bother changing if all 3 scenarios are even and more people want less injuries?

I wouldn't sweat it. He'll bring it up as a winter meeting topic. It'll get voted down. We'll continue on our merry way.

Cnasty wrote:Feeling the least confident heading into the postseason then we have with any of our other 120 win teams.

That being said, if we lose it was a random playoff fluke and we are the best team in the AL by far and will just chalk it up to OOTP randomness, right nick???

162 games > 15 so you are correct.

nick wrote:162 games > 15 so you are correct.

It only took me 13.

Miami News - @ViceRumors
Hot rumor going around that Miami will deploy a 3 man lefty rotation versus Sheltown. "They were 71-34 vRHP and 34-23 vLHP.. you do the math". Either way, Sheltown opens the series heavy favorites at -1000.

nick wrote:

Cnasty wrote:Feeling the least confident heading into the postseason then we have with any of our other 120 win teams.

That being said, if we lose it was a random playoff fluke and we are the best team in the AL by far and will just chalk it up to OOTP randomness, right nick???

162 games > 15 so you are correct.

MY MAN!