Re: 2013 College Football Season
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:35 pm
Just opened the door for the horns!
Before the door slams and the Bears beat that ass.
Before the door slams and the Bears beat that ass.
FSU by 20.Cnasty wrote:Auburn-FSU
This should be interesting
Opening line I'd go FSU - 14 or so.
Lsu 2007 after that crazy weekend.shel311 wrote:Auburn will be the most unlikely team in the title game since?
I should have clarified... Based on expectations from the preseason auburn is the most unlikely since?Cnasty wrote:Lsu 2007 after that crazy weekend.shel311 wrote:Auburn will be the most unlikely team in the title game since?
But they were a real good team but no one thought it would play out like that
Call me when Kentucky gets to play in the Dome. When you are a perpetual loser, all you have to hope for is for other people to lose. Misery loves company.jsence2 wrote:FSU's offense >>> Mizzou's offense
FSU's defense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mizzou's defense
Can't wait to see the Tigers get beat down.
I love the Coach and the team. I didn't get to see any of it I was traveling, but I listened to it. I love that semi onside call. You only call that if you think your defense can hold. And they did.SIRLOIN wrote:congrats to Ohio State for a great season and CONGRATS TO MY BELOVED MSU SPARTANS BIG TEN CHAMPIONS! ROSE BOWL HERE WE COME!!!!!
autiger730 wrote:Call me when Kentucky gets to play in the Dome. When you are a perpetual loser, all you have to hope for is for other people to lose. Misery loves company.jsence2 wrote:FSU's offense >>> Mizzou's offense
FSU's defense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mizzou's defense
Can't wait to see the Tigers get beat down.
With that out of the way. I haven't watched FSU play much. All I have seen are their ridiculous scores. For people who have watched both, how do they compare to bama defensively? Looking forward the game. Had some classic games with the Noles in the 80s. Also, I'd just like to point out that bama and Missouri were the #1 and #2 rush defenses in the SEC. Auburn ran for a combined 842 yards against them. They were giving up 227/G combined.
Well good for you, fuckstick. Thankfully, I don't have to sit at home and hope and pray for your team to lose every week, it happens regardless. I just said I haven't watched FSU play and other than tonight I had seen mizzou play one one series of overtime. So, how the fuck can I make a judgement about what you say about them? Why do you think people fell behind against bama? Because they were stuffing their run game, moron. Unlike FSU, I have watched bama nearly every week. That's why I asked the people around here that know what the fuck they are talking about for a comparison. You know what, fuck it, put your money where your mouth is. I'll take Auburn, you take Kentucky, ultimate homer showdown, loser leaves town. No more posts from the loser on these boards ever again.jsence2 wrote:autiger730 wrote:Call me when Kentucky gets to play in the Dome. When you are a perpetual loser, all you have to hope for is for other people to lose. Misery loves company.jsence2 wrote:FSU's offense >>> Mizzou's offense
FSU's defense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mizzou's defense
Can't wait to see the Tigers get beat down.
With that out of the way. I haven't watched FSU play much. All I have seen are their ridiculous scores. For people who have watched both, how do they compare to bama defensively? Looking forward the game. Had some classic games with the Noles in the 80s. Also, I'd just like to point out that bama and Missouri were the #1 and #2 rush defenses in the SEC. Auburn ran for a combined 842 yards against them. They were giving up 227/G combined.
You're the reason I want to watch them get destroyed.I make a valid point and your response is to attack my team instead of the fact that you're outmatched, especially your defense vs their offense. But it's ok, tell us again how you guys didn't get lucky last week.
And Bama and Mizzou were the "#1 and #2 rush defenses in the SEC" because teams usually fell behind and had to take to the air quite a bit, thus they didn't have to face much on the ground.