NDL Forum

Seriously, Dave is as bad at NCAA as I am at NBA2K. This version is fucked.

Guys that normally dominate (Shel, Talented, Mike) are losing to guys like Dave. Pfffffffffffff

shel311 wrote:My connection is gonna make a miraculous comeback.

I'm gonna play and win all 6 of my games left on the final day of the season.

2 loss LSU squeaks by 1 loss uconn and into the title game against pimpin.

Book it!!!

VTrunNgun wrote:

shel311 wrote:My connection is gonna make a miraculous comeback.

I'm gonna play and win all 6 of my games left on the final day of the season.

2 loss LSU squeaks by 1 loss uconn and into the title game against pimpin.

Book it!!!

Skeptical cat is afraid of a BCS championship game rematch.

shel311 wrote:

VTrunNgun wrote:

shel311 wrote:My connection is gonna make a miraculous comeback.

I'm gonna play and win all 6 of my games left on the final day of the season.

2 loss LSU squeaks by 1 loss uconn and into the title game against pimpin.

Book it!!!

Skeptical cat is afraid of a BCS championship game rematch.

The idea of potentially playing a BCS Title Game against a member of NDL: F with connections issues being a factor feels like De Ja Vu.

I know how this story ends...

*Looks towards Cnasty's direction at my Season 12 championship trophy

That was all you big man.

You lived in some dorm with a horrible connection and bad internetz all year. Dont try to blame NDL:F

Cnasty wrote:Seriously, Dave is as bad at NCAA as I am at NBA2K. This version is fucked.

Guys that normally dominate (Shel, Talented, Mike) are losing to guys like Dave. Pfffffffffffff

Hey, I can't even play the game...but if I did James White would be booking Wisconsin a ticket to the MNC.

Cnasty wrote:That was all you big man.

You lived in some dorm with a horrible connection and bad internetz all year. Dont try to blame NDL:F

First Off...It wasn't a dorm, it was an apartment off campus!

Secondly...Yes I did have bad internetz all year with my NAT Type 3 connection

Thirdly...You guys could have at least humored me on the Sim game instead of having Tennessee get blown out by 30+

VT Im with you bro. Sounds like it shaping up like a NDL:F conspiracy. I can not vote for a 1 loss team like Uconn that did not play a single A rated team all year. A loss to BC is way more damaging to the Huskies than two losses to a team in a conference like the Pac 12, Big 12, Big 10, or SEC. As for Boise, the one A team they played this season they lost and they only have 2 teams other than that game, against teams rated higher than a B. Sorry but neither of those teams deserve a shot IMO. I cannot vote for a team that has had multiple laggy games or wins either. Multiple games that have been decided after disconnects that is. Just my two cents

Steamrollr22 wrote: I can not vote for a 1 loss team like Uconn that did not play a single A rated team all year.

Basing anything on the teams rankings given by EA is foolish if you ask me.

I cannot vote for a team that has had multiple laggy games or wins either.

What exactly does this mean? Laggy?

edited to further explain...Weasel Ithink at this point you may have my vote. It is one of the more wide open seasons though that is for sure.

Steamrollr22 wrote:edited to further explain...Weasel Ithink at this point you may have my vote. It is one of the more wide open seasons though that is for sure.

mmmm can't vote for weasel then, he had a laggy victory over tulane.

Steamrollr22 wrote:VT Im with you bro. Sounds like it shaping up like a NDL:F conspiracy.

Lets get one thing straight, Dave is not NDL: F

Steamrollr22 wrote:edited to further explain...Weasel Ithink at this point you may have my vote. It is one of the more wide open seasons though that is for sure.

Nah Im not out campaigning by any means (hell I still havent played the CC game), just curious as to what you were talking about. Although I may be the beneficiary of your voting tactics, I think I still disagree with your process Ill take it though!

Steamrollr22 wrote: I cannot vote for a team that has had multiple laggy games

How do you know all who has had multiple laggy games?

shel311 wrote:

Steamrollr22 wrote: I cannot vote for a team that has had multiple laggy games

How do you know all who has had multiple laggy games?

yo...

Followed by anyone who as played me.

Steamrollr22 wrote:I can not vote for a 1 loss team like Uconn that did not play a single A rated team all year. A loss to BC is way more damaging to the Huskies than two losses to a team in a conference like the Pac 12, Big 12, Big 10, or SEC.

BC is #16 in the Massey's, is that loss really that damaging?

my projected SOS is just barely behind Mich St and ahead of Boise St and South Carolina to name a couple. Uconn played 4 BCS likely bowl eligible schools in non-conference (NC St -- 9 in current massey, BC -- 16 in current massey, Baylor -- 32 in current massey and Illinois -- 53 in massey).

also the Big East conference ranking is ahead of the Big 10 (which you said you'd rather have a 2 loss team from)

i think its very close between Mich St and myself when comparing the 2 but basing on the rating of a team is silly imo. Wisconsin could be an A team or whatever and go 6-6.

just wanted to point some things out, not meaning to campaign too hard... most of the potential championship game candidates are worthy and have good cases that can be made.

Hell ...all good points.. I dont know who to vote for anymore

DRiccio21 wrote:

Steamrollr22 wrote:I can not vote for a 1 loss team like Uconn that did not play a single A rated team all year. A loss to BC is way more damaging to the Huskies than two losses to a team in a conference like the Pac 12, Big 12, Big 10, or SEC.

BC is #16 in the Massey's, is that loss really that damaging?

my projected SOS is just barely behind Mich St and ahead of Boise St and South Carolina to name a couple. Uconn played 4 BCS likely bowl eligible schools in non-conference (NC St -- 9 in current massey, BC -- 16 in current massey, Baylor -- 32 in current massey and Illinois -- 53 in massey).

also the Big East conference ranking is ahead of the Big 10 (which you said you'd rather have a 2 loss team from)

i think its very close between Mich St and myself when comparing the 2 but basing on the rating of a team is silly imo. Wisconsin could be an A team or whatever and go 6-6.

just wanted to point some things out, not meaning to campaign too hard... most of the potential championship game candidates are worthy and have good cases that can be made.

Dave could be an attorney in his part time. well played sir.

DRiccio21 wrote:

Steamrollr22 wrote:I can not vote for a 1 loss team like Uconn that did not play a single A rated team all year. A loss to BC is way more damaging to the Huskies than two losses to a team in a conference like the Pac 12, Big 12, Big 10, or SEC.

BC is #16 in the Massey's, is that loss really that damaging?

my projected SOS is just barely behind Mich St and ahead of Boise St and South Carolina to name a couple. Uconn played 4 BCS likely bowl eligible schools in non-conference (NC St -- 9 in current massey, BC -- 16 in current massey, Baylor -- 32 in current massey and Illinois -- 53 in massey).

also the Big East conference ranking is ahead of the Big 10 (which you said you'd rather have a 2 loss team from)

i think its very close between Mich St and myself when comparing the 2 but basing on the rating of a team is silly imo. Wisconsin could be an A team or whatever and go 6-6.

just wanted to point some things out, not meaning to campaign too hard... most of the potential championship game candidates are worthy and have good cases that can be made.

don't worry, I will put out a huge article at the end of the season showcasing the top 25 and who they beat/lost and SOS (my fave criteria for voting)

1. VT has to win ACC Title game
2. Stanford has to win out
3. Michigan St has to win BIG10 Title game although opponent likely not ranked
4. UConn if two stumble has good chance despite no conf title game.
5. Boise St win out and use ndl:f provision