NDL Forum

trendon wrote:[548] CAL POLY SLO -5-110
[506] DEN NUGGETS -1½-110

haha, betting on my alma mater!

Pitt-3

pitt -3

gb +1
gb over 43.5

good job guys taking advantage of the -110 rules

VeniVediV1ci wrote: good job guys taking advantage of the -110 rules

?

[112] ATL FALCONS u44-105

pit is -130 almost everywhere but we only grade -110 in this contest so they were smart

...already a missed pass interference call

atl -1

atl gb over 43

VeniVediV1ci wrote: good job guys taking advantage of the -110 rules

didnt matter.

chinatown book--- pitt -3

italian guys -3.5

offshore -3

just needed to shop,but you could find a -3

Chi -10

New England o44.5

chicago -10

chi/sea over 42.5

Wes Welker receptions -1 vs. Santonio Holmes

Bears look good

Pats -9

added NE -9.5

NYJ + points

Jets +9

Took the Jets ML right before kickoff (I have Pats -2.5 in a three team tease that already has the first two legs hit).

Small window I can lose both but at +320 on the Jets ML it was a worthwhile hedge against the tease.

dakshdar wrote:Took the Jets ML right before kickoff (I have Pats -2.5 in a three team tease that already has the first two legs hit).

Small window I can lose both but at +320 on the Jets ML it was a worthwhile hedge against the tease.

looks good at the moment, but if I were you I would have played the Jets +9 so if the pats win by 3-8 you'd win the teaser and your bet

VeniVediV1ci wrote:

dakshdar wrote:Took the Jets ML right before kickoff (I have Pats -2.5 in a three team tease that already has the first two legs hit).

Small window I can lose both but at +320 on the Jets ML it was a worthwhile hedge against the tease.

looks good at the moment, but if I were you I would have played the Jets +9 so if the pats win by 3-8 you'd win the teaser and your bet

I thought about that, but then you're just getting the 1:1 payoff (approximately) on the +9.

If the money line was smaller on the Jets (in the 100-200 range) I would have probably just taken the +9. But at +320 it was worthwhile.