NDL Forum

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:17 pm**

GeorgesGoons wrote:I don't think it affects him at all. Maybe I am not seeing the whole picture though

Apologies if I misunderstood the post in advance Dak, it just seemed odd to advocate for Alabama instead of New England

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:18 pm**

GeorgesGoons wrote:
DRWebs wrote:
The_Niddler wrote:
DRWebs wrote:Jerry's browsing the forums praying Ry makes his selection before he has to
Some of us work during the day, sorry!
I thank you for working hard today so I don't have to!
Future Bernie Sanders voter right there

No George I very much plan to work often in the future but again waiting on that class date with the FAA. I don't consider my taking of 13 credits to be working hard

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:19 pm**

lmaoooo so far only Cincy has made a change. NL gonna NL, AL gonna AL.

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:21 pm**

DRWebs wrote:
dakshdar wrote:I saw that, but 0.002 percentage points on a 20+ season win percentage is trumping the fact that a Top 12 team in a now closed division finished a net 95.5 games out of first the last two seasons?

Shit, Port Orange finished a net 65 games ahead of NE the last two seasons -- and they're now supposed to represent the top of that division together?

This is not a dig at Dave, he's rebuilding and that's part of the process. I hope he'll prove me wrong here and rebound to form quickly, but I didn't think that was his plan from what he's been doing this year and last (full scrub of the entire organization to rebuild, not a quick turnaround re-tool).
Where were you during this entire process to say "Hey I think we should use X years for our sample size and here's the results"? You didn't say anything until it potentially affected you, and again put in what work to the discussion? Using the historical data was not me manipulating things to help myself, just presenting the most complete set of data. At any point, someone could have stepped forward and said okay let's vote on how many years to use since we had some want 3 and others saying 5, and I'm sure others having a different opinion. I think going forward we will need to determine how many years we will keep the divisions before redrafting and that will affect how many previous years to consider (IE keeping divisions for 3 years = using last 3 years for order).

I have no clue how or if it would affect me at all. When the original lists came out (I thought), I saw Alabama in the Top 12 and NE in the Bottom 18. That was even how it was in Ted's mock/prediction draft thing. So it was just odd (to me) that when the draft started the lists were different than that. Nowhere am I saying anyone did anything to manipulate things or help themselves.

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:23 pm**

I just picked some arbitrary ratings that dwebs put out, it was mostly just for entertainment.

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:24 pm**

nick wrote:lmaoooo so far only Cincy has made a change. NL gonna NL, AL gonna AL.

I'm guessing Richmond goes to NL White

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:24 pm**

Uuaww wrote:I just picked some arbitrary ratings that dwebs put out, it was mostly just for entertainment.

Understood.

So I can just really blame him then if he's responsible for both lists and all the confusion?

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:26 pm**

dakshdar wrote:
Uuaww wrote:I just picked some arbitrary ratings that dwebs put out, it was mostly just for entertainment.
Understood.

So I can just really blame him then if he's responsible for both lists and all the confusion?

I'd take the blame and am now worried I could have cut off a decimal or did something when sorting

Edit: checked the site and then the list I posted for Corey. I even checked all of my posts! Ted is clearly to blame for the confusion

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:30 pm**

if Philly is truly AL then he has to go with Cincy.. suckaaaa.

I got it easy; i got Sheltown

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:46 pm**

nick wrote:I got it easy; i got Sheltown

This rivalry was better before you won anything!!!

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:10 pm**

shel311 wrote:
nick wrote:I got it easy; i got Sheltown
This rivalry was better before you won anything!!!

now im just 3 wins behind you all time so this will be an exciting year. Hopefully be +10 by the end

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:12 pm**

nick wrote:
shel311 wrote:
nick wrote:I got it easy; i got Sheltown
This rivalry was better before you won anything!!!
now im just 3 wins behind you all time so this will be an exciting year. Hopefully be +10 by the end

O/U Miami has 13 more wins than Sheltown next season?

That's actually not a bad place to set it at, I'm thinking.

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:14 pm**

Seeit alerted.

Making a pick momentarily

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:19 pm**

Solid pace for far, well done all

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:26 pm**

Some big transformational picks coming up here

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:27 pm**

Bored so I'll throw some odds out there for Dan's selection of pairing

Albany - 60%
Cookeville - 25%
Dillonvale - 10%
Cincinnati - 5%

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:40 pm**

Sorry guys. Got in on a red eye this morning and was napping. Didn't think we'd get to me before I woke up. Thanks for the heads up C.

NL White for me.

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:41 pm**

DRWebs wrote:Bored so I'll throw some odds out there for Dan's selection of pairing

Albany - 60%
Cookeville - 25%
Dillonvale - 10%
Cincinnati - 5%

I wanted to go with Cincy all along but the way it lies now, if I had done that, Teddy gets off easy. Now he either stays in the same Conference as me, or gets Mike. Decisions
Decisions.

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:49 pm**

Since the original prediction had me following JD I guess i will make it official and go NL Red

Posted: **Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:51 pm**

Seeitsaveit13 wrote: I wanted to go with Cincy all along but the way it lies now, if I had done that, Teddy gets off easy.

yeah, philly keeps him in check

NDL Forum

Realignment Draft (DONE)

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Dillonvale on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Richmond on the clock)

Re: Realignment Draft(Philadelphia on the clock)