Why's that?Crowes wrote:
The Mormon church is far from what most of us would consider a charity.
And they average about 14% to charity over a 20 year period.
Why's that?Crowes wrote:
The Mormon church is far from what most of us would consider a charity.
And the difference between the last year or 2 and before?OracleHCR wrote:Why's that?Crowes wrote:
The Mormon church is far from what most of us would consider a charity.
And they average about 14% to charity over a 20 year period.
Last year they gave 29%. The rest have all been 13-14%shel311 wrote:And the difference between the last year or 2 and before?OracleHCR wrote:Why's that?Crowes wrote:
The Mormon church is far from what most of us would consider a charity.
And they average about 14% to charity over a 20 year period.
I'd bet my savings the increase was huge.
It's all a facade. All of em, the sooner we learn, the better off we'll be.
There ya go.OracleHCR wrote:Last year they gave 29%. The rest have all been 13-14%
shel311 wrote:I would love to see the percentage he donated to charity in previous years compared to the last couple when he knew he would run for president.OracleHCR wrote:This is what I'm talking about. They're all fucking rich. They want you to believe he's a demon because he's got money but they all have money and use the same tax loopholes he does. They leave out the fact that he donates millions to charities. Like $10 mil over the past 3 years.buckeye76 wrote: RoMoney.
The bickering over which president is better is something I'll never understand.
I see what you are saying but giving $2 mil a year every year for 20 years doesn't exactly paint him as a heartless rich guy like they are making him out to be.shel311 wrote:There ya go.OracleHCR wrote:Last year they gave 29%. The rest have all been 13-14%
And not that any is bad, it's more than I give lol.
But it's not exactly a coincidence that the spike comes the year he plans to run for office.
Given their low priority placed on helping others with no religious strings attached, it's hard to understand how donating money to a church qualifies to anyone as a humanitarian act.OracleHCR wrote:Why's that?Crowes wrote:
The Mormon church is far from what most of us would consider a charity.
And they average about 14% to charity over a 20 year period.
But the best estimates available put church spending on basic non-religious charitable activities where non-members are eligible for service in the single digits. This is true for Mormons, Catholics and others.OracleHCR wrote:Churches do a lot of good. A lot of good. food banks, shelters, disaster relief to name a few things. They could not do these things if nobody donated to them. You may or may not like religion but to deny these as humanitarian is plain stupid.
Also to add.. Mormonism is a pay-to-play religion. Without paying the tithe, a believer may not enter a Mormon temple or participate fully in the activities of the faith. This is why Mormon giving is so much higher, per capita.Crowes wrote:But the best estimates available put church spending on basic non-religious charitable activities where non-members are eligible for service in the single digits. This is true for Mormons, Catholics and others.OracleHCR wrote:Churches do a lot of good. A lot of good. food banks, shelters, disaster relief to name a few things. They could not do these things if nobody donated to them. You may or may not like religion but to deny these as humanitarian is plain stupid.
You lost me on this. Ive read it several times and cant comprehend it. I know the church I go to does a lot for the community and it doesn't matter if you go to the church. After hurricanes or other disasters, groups always go to where ever the damage is (Louisiana, Mississippi, South Florida, etc...) and help rebuild and offer aid. A lot of the churches in my area are the same. All of them have food banks and shelters for the homeless.Crowes wrote: But the best estimates available put church spending on basic non-religious charitable activities where non-members are eligible for service in the single digits. This is true for Mormons, Catholics and others.
Don't know what is hard to comprehend I am not saying that a church can do no good in your community. The big religious establishments which is what Romneys "charitable" giving goes to is what im talking about.OracleHCR wrote:You lost me on this. Ive read it several times and cant comprehend it. I know the church I go to does a lot for the community and it doesn't matter if you go to the church. After hurricanes or other disasters, groups always go to where ever the damage is (Louisiana, Mississippi, South Florida, etc...) and help rebuild and offer aid. A lot of the churches in my area are the same. All of them have food banks and shelters for the homeless.Crowes wrote: But the best estimates available put church spending on basic non-religious charitable activities where non-members are eligible for service in the single digits. This is true for Mormons, Catholics and others.
As for the Mormon religion, I know. They're out there in my opinion. Way out there. But who am I to judge? Freedom of religion. You should read about scientology.
Tell us about both topics?beercop wrote:Why is obama's charity or muslim heritage not questioned?
Because Obama has actually released his tax returns.beercop wrote:What does it matter if he is rich or if he gives money to charity? Why is obama's charity or muslim heritage not questioned?
That sentence does not makes sense. I do not understand what you are trying to say. What does "in the single digits" mean?Crowes wrote:Don't know what is hard to comprehend I am not saying that a church can do no good in your community. The big religious establishments which is what Romneys "charitable" giving goes to is what im talking about.OracleHCR wrote:You lost me on this. Ive read it several times and cant comprehend it. I know the church I go to does a lot for the community and it doesn't matter if you go to the church. After hurricanes or other disasters, groups always go to where ever the damage is (Louisiana, Mississippi, South Florida, etc...) and help rebuild and offer aid. A lot of the churches in my area are the same. All of them have food banks and shelters for the homeless.Crowes wrote: But the best estimates available put church spending on basic non-religious charitable activities where non-members are eligible for service in the single digits. This is true for Mormons, Catholics and others.
As for the Mormon religion, I know. They're out there in my opinion. Way out there. But who am I to judge? Freedom of religion. You should read about scientology.
Even if he is Muslim, that matters why? I am a church goin fella the last year or so. Never been big on organized religion personally. I believe in what I want. He can believe in what he wants. Doesn't make him any less than IShiftdnb wrote:Because Obama has actually released his tax returns.beercop wrote:What does it matter if he is rich or if he gives money to charity? Why is obama's charity or muslim heritage not questioned?
http://www.barackobama.com/tax-returns/
and I believe his muslim heritage is beaten like a dead horse by conservative media.
freedom of religion. He can follow whatever faith he wants. If he is Muslim though, he has been lying about it to the American public for quite a while though and that would be an issue.BFiVL wrote:
Even if he is Muslim, that matters why? I am a church goin fella the last year or so. Never been big on organized religion personally. I believe in what I want. He can believe in what he wants. Doesn't make him any less than I
Shit. I was dead tired and had to stay up. I can comprehend what he was getting at this morning.BFiVL wrote:Oracle. In single digits probably refers to the church overall donations bein in single digits percent to non church relegated activity