Page 6 of 8

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:14 pm
by Nole4real
not for nothing but if boise makes title game it will be broadcast

:mrgreen:

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:19 pm
by DRiccio21
Nole4real wrote:not for nothing but if boise makes title game it will be broadcast

:mrgreen:
i don't think the MWC has a title game. most of those little conferences don't

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:19 pm
by Cnasty
Boise first place votes from here on out

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:27 pm
by Nole4real
DRiccio21 wrote:
Nole4real wrote:not for nothing but if boise makes title game it will be broadcast

:mrgreen:
i don't think the MWC has a title game. most of those little conferences don't

wut u did ther.....

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:28 pm
by Nole4real
Cnasty wrote:Boise first place votes from here on out

...and it WONT be played at casa de krentsa

..how funny would that be though if we told VT it was

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:32 pm
by Cnasty
Nole cant handle the Nasty Dome!!!

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:32 pm
by Nole4real
your candles are insuffecient

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:36 pm
by DRiccio21
you're going to broadcast the Poinsettia Bowl, seems like a waste... but cool for the league nonetheless

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:53 pm
by Nole4real
DRiccio21 wrote:you're going to broadcast the Poinsettia Bowl, seems like a waste... but cool for the league nonetheless
.....I see it.

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:03 pm
by texasfan4444
Nole4real wrote:your candles are insuffecient
:lol:

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:23 pm
by VTrunNgun
Nole4real wrote:
Cnasty wrote:Boise first place votes from here on out

...and it WONT be played at casa de krentsa

..how funny would that be though if we told VT it was
Image

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:20 am
by DRiccio21
and down goes Kansas St.

-- Hannah Storm reports

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:32 am
by Uuaww
How I rank the teams right now.

1. Virginia Tech
2. Michigan State
3. Stanford (1 loss, wins Pac12)
4. UConn
5. 2-loss SEC West team (wins SEC)
6. 2-loss USC (wins Pac 12)
7. 2-loss South Carolina (wins SEC)

If V-Tech wins out, he goes to the NC, that's pretty set in stone.

If both Michigan State and Stanford win out, then it will become a voting war between Weasel and Plasma. GL to both of them. If one loses, the other likely gets in over UConn. A 1 loss UConn team should have the SOS to be better than any 2 loss team. The Big East had some of the best coaches ever in it this year, and Driccio knocked em all. But he should root for South Carolina to win the SEC as he had the weakest SOS. Upsets in the Pac 12 seem likely, the SEC isn't done killing itself yet either. The big problem is Weasel is going to go up against an underperforming Leaders champion and should wax whoever it is, Seems more likely that V-tech loses.

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:41 am
by DRiccio21
should be interesting for sure.

Massey had it:

1.Va Tech
2. Stanford
3. USC
4. UConn
5. Mich St

that was before the Stanford and USC losses and before Mich St's last two wins. can't wait to see the updated massey's.

if BC wins out until the ACC champ game, he's already 16th in Massey and could make my 1 loss look alot better.

i feel like a golfer who was playing in the first group and has been done all day just sitting in the back watching the other guys finish their rounds.

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:09 pm
by shel311
My connection is gonna make a miraculous comeback.

I'm gonna play and win all 6 of my games left on the final day of the season.

2 loss LSU squeaks by 1 loss uconn and into the title game against pimpin.



Book it!!!

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:19 pm
by ajalves
DRiccio21 wrote:should be interesting for sure.

Massey had it:

1.Va Tech
2. Stanford
3. USC
4. UConn
5. Mich St

that was before the Stanford and USC losses and before Mich St's last two wins. can't wait to see the updated massey's.

if BC wins out until the ACC champ game, he's already 16th in Massey and could make my 1 loss look alot better.

i feel like a golfer who was playing in the first group and has been done all day just sitting in the back watching the other guys finish their rounds.
11-1. thats pretty impressive Dave

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:25 pm
by Cnasty
You know this game is fucked when Dave is 11-1.

Quality work EA. :roll:

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:32 pm
by DRiccio21
Cnasty wrote:You know this game is fucked when Dave is 11-1.

Quality work EA. :roll:
cough cough... engaged Dave... with a B+ UConn team

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:34 pm
by ajalves
DRiccio21 wrote:
Cnasty wrote:You know this game is fucked when Dave is 11-1.

Quality work EA. :roll:
cough cough... engaged Dave... with a B+ UConn team

still. with the over juiced defenses in this game, bad things can pile up quickly. Any team that only loses once has done something

Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:07 pm
by texasfan4444
ajalves wrote:
DRiccio21 wrote:
Cnasty wrote:You know this game is fucked when Dave is 11-1.

Quality work EA. :roll:
cough cough... engaged Dave... with a B+ UConn team

still. with the over juiced defenses in this game, bad things can pile up quickly. Any team that only loses once has done something
agreed. i saw his record when i was voting and made note to not schedule him this version.