Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Moderator: I_S33M_THAB33T_U

Locked
User avatar
I_S33M_THAB33T_U
Reactions:
Posts: 4848
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:28 am
Contact:

Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by I_S33M_THAB33T_U »

Dodgers Send

SP - Zach Greinke - 93 ovr
RP - Brian WIlson - 79 ovr

Cardinals Send

SP - Adam Wainwright - 95 ovr
RP - John Motte - 81 ovr
The_Niddler
Reactions:
Posts: 17231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
Location: Small Town, Ohio

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by The_Niddler »

I don't necessarily see an issue with this trade.
Numbers wise it is pretty even.

The issue I see is, would the Cardinals really trade away those players in real life when they are really getting nothing that is helping them out in return?

The relief pitchers are pretty damn close and so is the SPs.

Just my thoughts, again, it is a meh trade. I don't see any real benefit to either side.
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
User avatar
ReignOnU
Reactions:
Posts: 19643
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
Location: Cincinnati Titans
Contact:

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by ReignOnU »

Based purely on overall, it is a direct upgrade in 2 positions for the user. I think this is a bad precedent to start off with. I'd like to see any CPU trade be equal or less in total OVR for each side, based on "useable" players. What that means is that people don't skate around the requirement by throwing in their 75 rated backup OF for the CPU's 65 rated backup OF.

My initial reaction to this is no. I'm open to talking through it.
PSN: ReignOnU
User avatar
I_S33M_THAB33T_U
Reactions:
Posts: 4848
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by I_S33M_THAB33T_U »

ReignOnU wrote:Based purely on overall, it is a direct upgrade in 2 positions for the user. I think this is a bad precedent to start off with. I'd like to see any CPU trade be equal or less in total OVR for each side, based on "useable" players. What that means is that people don't skate around the requirement by throwing in their 75 rated backup OF for the CPU's 65 rated backup OF.

My initial reaction to this is no. I'm open to talking through it.

I was pretty much thinking the same thing myself.

ALso to add to Niddlers about would they trade away. TO me the RP are whatever. But no the Cards would not trade away 25 year Wainwright for 31 yr old Grienke any day. And like Reign said, the user is gaining and the CPU is losing in both. I am also leaning towards a no here.
The_Niddler
Reactions:
Posts: 17231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
Location: Small Town, Ohio

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by The_Niddler »

I agree on the no vote.

I did not look at the players ages and I agree that they would not trade a 25 year old for a 31 year old who is technically worse in overall rating.
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
User avatar
VTrunNgun
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by VTrunNgun »

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
jsence2
Reactions:
Posts: 18758
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by jsence2 »

I thought this was just a one season thing? They saw it as "fair value" so that's why I submitted it.

I can re-do it with a third piece from each and send it through tonight.
Image

S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
User avatar
BFiVL
Reactions:
Posts: 9095
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:01 am

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by BFiVL »

Call benson and stabler. I smell a trade rape.
Image
Image
User avatar
cougnix
Reactions:
Posts: 9086
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:31 pm
Location: Fife, WA
Contact:

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by cougnix »

Did Ted put Jason up to this?
ImageImage

PSN: Cougnix
User avatar
I_S33M_THAB33T_U
Reactions:
Posts: 4848
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: Dodgers(Jason) n Cardinals(CPU)

Post by I_S33M_THAB33T_U »

jsence2 wrote:I thought this was just a one season thing? They saw it as "fair value" so that's why I submitted it.

I can re-do it with a third piece from each and send it through tonight.

It is a 1 season thing, But I will not let you take advantage of a trade. The reason there is a trade committee.

You can try to redo it, But if the same 4 players are in the mix I can guarantee it gonna end up the same way. You win here and Cards get nothing.

Final vote as all 3 on committee is - NO
Locked

Return to “Trade Announcements”