+ Steph went off.DRiccio21 wrote:i hit value on like my first 9 guys last night, didn't watch the late games as i just assumed i cashed on all my 50/50's and woke finding out that Davis, Nate Rob and Klay all shit the bed
Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
- footballkelly31
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Any help for tonight? Using fan duel played Wednesday and got mid 50's in 3 50/50s....sucks went to bed in the 20's and wake up out of luck.
Sea. 14: UTEP MINERS 4-8
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
- footballkelly31
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Lets see how bad I am tonight here is the lineup I went with
Lowry
Wall
Butler
McCollum
Gay
Bjelica
Favors
Randle
Hibbert
Lowry
Wall
Butler
McCollum
Gay
Bjelica
Favors
Randle
Hibbert
Sea. 14: UTEP MINERS 4-8
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Huge changes to the soccer game, including:
11 players (vs 8)
Tackles and crosses from corners worth points
No more "one goal allowed" bonuses (meaning difference between a clean sheet and one goal allowed is seven points!)
Deductions for yellow cards and fouls conceded
With that said, here is my tentative lineup, pending starting XI announcements in the morning (and with $1000 spare salary I have plenty of wiggle room)
Hart
Fuchs
Nyom
Otamendi
Abdi
De Bruyne
Payet
Bony
Giroud
Joel Campbell
Vardy
11 players (vs 8)
Tackles and crosses from corners worth points
No more "one goal allowed" bonuses (meaning difference between a clean sheet and one goal allowed is seven points!)
Deductions for yellow cards and fouls conceded
With that said, here is my tentative lineup, pending starting XI announcements in the morning (and with $1000 spare salary I have plenty of wiggle room)
Hart
Fuchs
Nyom
Otamendi
Abdi
De Bruyne
Payet
Bony
Giroud
Joel Campbell
Vardy
S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
- footballkelly31
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Winning night as Favors and Lowery were not owned by many and each topped 40. Saving grace was that everyone was on Randle so when he crapped the bed it hurt a lot of teams. Looking to press my luck tonight, let me know what you think of the lineup:
Paul
Conley
Bledsoe
Gordon
Barnes
George
Griffin
Porzingis
Ezeli
Paul
Conley
Bledsoe
Gordon
Barnes
George
Griffin
Porzingis
Ezeli
Sea. 14: UTEP MINERS 4-8
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
jsence2 wrote:Huge changes to the soccer game, including:
11 players (vs 8)
Tackles and crosses from corners worth points
No more "one goal allowed" bonuses (meaning difference between a clean sheet and one goal allowed is seven points!)
Deductions for yellow cards and fouls conceded
With that said, here is my tentative lineup, pending starting XI announcements in the morning (and with $1000 spare salary I have plenty of wiggle room)
Hart
Fuchs
Nyom
Otamendi - GOAL
Abdi
De Bruyne - ASSIST
Payet
Bony
Giroud - GOAL
Joel Campbell - GOAL
Vardy - GOAL
I hope you guys tailed this this morning.....
With Fuchs not even playing, I cashed in six of six with this lineup (and 10 of 11 overall), won a ton of cash this morning. Had Hart not pulled a Joe Hart (dropping a cross for an easy tap-in goal late), I would've won almost 50% more than I did.
S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
- footballkelly31
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Anyone have an opinion on which on of these lineups I should go with: If I use Gasol then I have to use Russell. Leaning Gasol and Russell
Conley / D. Russell
Lowry
Wade
L. Williams
j. Green
Mirotic
Davis
Randle
Valanciunas/ M. Gasol
Conley / D. Russell
Lowry
Wade
L. Williams
j. Green
Mirotic
Davis
Randle
Valanciunas/ M. Gasol
Sea. 14: UTEP MINERS 4-8
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
Sea. 15: STANFORD CARDINALS 3-9
Sea. 16: WAKE FOREST 2-10
Sea. 17: COLORADO ST. 3-9
Sea. 18: SOUTHERN MISS 5-7
Sea. 19: KENT ST. 3-9
Sea. 20,21: LOUISVILLE CARDINALS 1-11
Sea. 22-24: TEMPLE OWLS 24-15
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
NY Attorney General is going hard after DK/FD. It'll be interesting to see if they have a contingency plan for their headquarters.
PSN: ReignOnU
- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15321
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Assuming it's in NY?ReignOnU wrote:NY Attorney General is going hard after DK/FD. It'll be interesting to see if they have a contingency plan for their headquarters.
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
FD definitely is and if I remember right, DK is split between Boston and NY.
PSN: ReignOnU
- I_S33M_THAB33T_U
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4848
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:28 am
- Contact:
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Both will be shut down, real soon.
Twitch - http://www.twitch.tv/MaizeNation
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
No they won't. It will drag on in court long before they get shut down. Or they'll simply move to Texas, who has no problem with DFS (that's why FantasyHub is there).
S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72598
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Oh, that's good to hear!!!jsence2 wrote: Or they'll simply move to Texas, who has no problem with DFS (that's why FantasyHub is there).
- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15321
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Just because a HQ is legal doesn't mean states won't ban the game itself.
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Just because a HQ is legal doesn't mean states won't ban the game itself.
And that's a whole different issue. NY can ban the game, and the people in NY can't play it--however, if the entity is HQ there, they cannot provide it unless they move. That was my point. Nothing will get shut down anytime soon....it just means that people in NY may not be able to play anymore. Most states simply don't care enough. NY cares partly because it's taking revenue away from other gambling entities (mainly casino and horse racing).
S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15321
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
jsence2 wrote:Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Just because a HQ is legal doesn't mean states won't ban the game itself.
And that's a whole different issue. NY can ban the game, and the people in NY can't play it--however, if the entity is HQ there, they cannot provide it unless they move. That was my point. Nothing will get shut down anytime soon....it just means that people in NY may not be able to play anymore. Most states simply don't care enough. NY cares partly because it's taking revenue away from other gambling entities (mainly casino and horse racing).
Agreed.
More and more states are doing it now. It's gonna get worse before it gets better. They've got them in a catch 22 and there either gonna get kicked out of a state or end up paying a shit load of tax to keep going. Will be interesting to see what happens
- ReignOnU
- Reactions:
- Posts: 19643
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: Cincinnati Titans
- Contact:
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
That's what the poker industry thought too... still waiting for the better.Seeitsaveit13 wrote: Agreed.
More and more states are doing it now. It's gonna get worse before it gets better. They've got them in a catch 22 and there either gonna get kicked out of a state or end up paying a shit load of tax to keep going. Will be interesting to see what happens
PSN: ReignOnU
- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15321
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Correct. I should have thrown an (if) after that.ReignOnU wrote:That's what the poker industry thought too... still waiting for the better.Seeitsaveit13 wrote: Agreed.
More and more states are doing it now. It's gonna get worse before it gets better. They've got them in a catch 22 and there either gonna get kicked out of a state or end up paying a shit load of tax to keep going. Will be interesting to see what happens
Basically they need to be regulated to be considered acceptable, but if they're regulated then they're considered gambling which then makes them illegal. That's the catch 22 they're stuck in
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Correct. I should have thrown an (if) after that.ReignOnU wrote:That's what the poker industry thought too... still waiting for the better.Seeitsaveit13 wrote: Agreed.
More and more states are doing it now. It's gonna get worse before it gets better. They've got them in a catch 22 and there either gonna get kicked out of a state or end up paying a shit load of tax to keep going. Will be interesting to see what happens
Basically they need to be regulated to be considered acceptable, but if they're regulated then they're considered gambling which then makes them illegal. That's the catch 22 they're stuck in
The difference is, the NFL gets ad revenue from them, and they didn't from poker. Don't underestimate how much pull The Shield might have in making sure DK/FD stay in business.
S14: N Texas 7-1
S15: Wake 8-5
S16-21: Washington 9-4, 10-3, 8-5, 9-4, 7-6, 6-7
S22: Ohio 8-5
S23: ECU 12-2
S24-26: Kentucky 8-5, 5-7, 5-7
Career: 102-61
Re: Fanduel / Draft Kings Discussion
supposedly Fanduel delaying payments out to players by 2-3 days.
highly doubt anything happens to anyone with money in the site, but if i had a substantial amount of money in it i'd at least consider taking some to be on safe side.
a) you shouldn't have a substantial amount in it unless you're a pro.
b) i still highly doubt anything happens to your money either way.
c) doesn't hurt to be safe in times of uncertainty.
highly doubt anything happens to anyone with money in the site, but if i had a substantial amount of money in it i'd at least consider taking some to be on safe side.
a) you shouldn't have a substantial amount in it unless you're a pro.
b) i still highly doubt anything happens to your money either way.
c) doesn't hurt to be safe in times of uncertainty.