He did.ajalves wrote:you're assuming Betts wants to stay in boston. its not like he will be a RFA.....anyone can offer him that contract
And with nick on this one. Since we are both Sox fans, when have we ever worried about the luxury tax?
He did.ajalves wrote:you're assuming Betts wants to stay in boston. its not like he will be a RFA.....anyone can offer him that contract
Serious f'n gymnastics going on herenick wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:44 pm and theres the obvious
Given that he was manager in 1987 and didn't bet on the Reds every game, he totally tainted the game. There is evidence that Rose bet on 52 games in 1987. That's roughly one-third of the games.
Let's say that's how many times he bet on the Reds. That means that two out of every three games he didn't. So in the one game he did bet on the Reds, it seems pretty easy to see that he'd use his best relievers and manage harder to win the games when he had money on the line. His team trails early when he didn't bet on his team? Why not remove some of the starting position players to rest them and use the bottom-feeding relievers and prepare the team to win the next time he bet on them to win, right?
I didn't go back to see what was posted. But yes, there should be some banning going on. What sucks is pitchers are going to get suspensions this year in retaliation for them cheating.